PDA

View Full Version : Sof3!!



mr. nails
12-29-2005, 08:14 PM
only found this and it doesn't say much, but the fact that ravensoft is making it and using Doom 3 engine! can't wait!!! any more links or what not?

http://www.sof2.jolt.co.uk/

Smith
12-29-2005, 08:48 PM
Sweet, I loved SOF2. the single player was kind of dry, but the multiplayer was alot of fun.

I kinda want to re install it again...

Guyver
12-29-2005, 08:51 PM
cool.

S!X
12-29-2005, 11:46 PM
Nice :D I used to play SOF2 back in the day (multiplayer).

Guyver
12-30-2005, 01:54 AM
yeh it was fun blowing off body parts :)

S!X
12-30-2005, 02:03 AM
yeh it was fun blowing off body parts :)

ya :D The MP5 and M4 were my favorite guns..... the RPG's were fun to run around with too :D:lol:

mr. nails
12-30-2005, 06:26 AM
yeah, sof2 was GREAT! i agree with sof2 sp sucking ballz. sof2 was ALL mp! lol, i've uninstalled / reinstalled sof2 like 4 times. i want to leave the game to play something new, but the fucker always pulls me back. hrmmm? c'mon sof3! hopefully this time the mods will honor the game a little longer and not give up on it so quickly.

S!X
12-30-2005, 06:28 AM
You guys just played the regular SOF2 or SOF2 gold? I just to screw around with aimbots in the regular sof2 MP until i switch over to gold which has punkbuster... then I started playing legit :ph43r:

mr. nails
12-30-2005, 08:16 AM
i played sof2 from beta 'til about early this year. had to let it go. was ignoring to many other games.

http://www.agon.gigaworks.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=219

Dark Steno
12-30-2005, 01:01 PM
no shit? oh man! :D

Formula1
12-30-2005, 07:13 PM
I played SOF2 a few months ago for the first time and i tohught that the single player was very dry also, and there were so much bugs, i couldn't stand it! Hopefully Sof3 is as good or better than Quake 4 (Ravensoft helped developed this also). The multiplayer of Quake 4 sucked balls though...

Smith
12-30-2005, 08:45 PM
I would be much happier if it wasnt on the D3 engine.The source engine though...

mr. nails
12-30-2005, 10:12 PM
I would be much happier if it wasnt on the D3 engine.The source engine though...
what's wrong with the d3 engine? i like it.

cpt_azad
12-31-2005, 04:14 AM
I don't care about what engine it runs on, honestly, source and d3 engine, i couldnt care less. all i care about is the mutilation :D and the kickass mp :D:D:D , cannot wait :)

Peerzy
12-31-2005, 08:02 PM
The Source engine is as good at every aspect apart from lighting but im sure with a bit of development it could be adapted. It also unlike the D3 not a resource hog and would run on a medium spec computer quite easly.

mr. nails
12-31-2005, 10:32 PM
just more talk...

http://forums.filefront.com/showthread.php?t=231549

Formula1
01-01-2006, 12:23 AM
The Source engine is as good at every aspect apart from lighting but im sure with a bit of development it could be adapted. It also unlike the D3 not a resource hog and would run on a medium spec computer quite easly.

Nah i recently just played Quake 4 on my new system. The graphics of Counter-strike source (at max settings) dont even come close! Well the character models, that is...

D3 engine fucking kicks ass, just make sure you have an nVidia video card :P

By the way, does anyone know what engine that F.e.a.r and Chronicles of Riddick, use? Seriously the graphics of these two games are alike, and they are published by the same company (vivendi universal).

mr. nails
01-05-2006, 07:56 AM
2 more readings. 1st read is kinda gay, but 2nd is proof! lol, i'm hoping...

http://forums.ravensoft.com/ib/ikonboard.pl?;act=ST;f=1;t=34574

http://forums.ravensoft.com/ib/ikonboard.pl?;act=ST;f=1;t=34502