PDA

View Full Version : Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?



Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 12:24 AM
Indeed it is.

A man sticking his cawk into another man's arse is not a good thing. There is absolutely no reasonable justification for it. It simply isn't what either thing was made for.

That's not morals, or religion, it's scientific fact.

callum
05-14-2006, 12:27 AM
Is a man sticking his cawk into a females arse wrong?
After she has given him a written permission note of course.

Guillaume
05-14-2006, 12:28 AM
Mentioning rods in this thread would be in bad taste, don't you think?

callum
05-14-2006, 12:29 AM
The taste of the rods would depend on where the have been.

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 12:32 AM
The taste of the rods would depend on where the have been.
I can honestly say that is a problem I will never have.

You however may speak for yourself.

callum
05-14-2006, 12:34 AM
The taste of the rods would depend on where the have been.
I can honestly say that is a problem I will never have.

You however may speak for yourself.

I wont bother to ask for the source of this scientific fact then you dirty googling b;)

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 12:45 AM
What's the prostate glad for?

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 12:45 AM
I can honestly say that is a problem I will never have.

You however may speak for yourself.

I wont bother to ask for the source of this scientific fact then you dirty googling b;)
Pas de Google.

Cawks are for pishing and making babies.

Arses are for getting rid of shite.

Why would one want to put the former in the latter. It makes no sense.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 12:48 AM
What's the prostate glad for?
The prostate is an exocrine gland of the male mammalian reproductive system. Its main function is to secrete and store a clear, slightly basic fluid that constitutes up to one-third of the volume of semen, like.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 12:52 AM
The prostate is an exocrine gland of the male mammalian reproductive system. Its main function is to secrete and store a clear, slightly basic fluid that constitutes up to one-third of the volume of semen, like.

Why does it work like a male G-spot? As in, why does stimulation for the glad (which can be reach from the anus) cause sexual release?

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 12:53 AM
What's the prostate glad for?
To encourage men to let other men stick their cawk up their arse.

No I don't think that's it.

What do you think it's for?

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 12:55 AM
What's the prostate glad for? To encourage men to let other men stick their cawk up their arse.

No I don't think that's it.

What do you think it's for?

When why does it work as such? :unsure:

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 12:56 AM
The prostate is an exocrine gland of the male mammalian reproductive system. Its main function is to secrete and store a clear, slightly basic fluid that constitutes up to one-third of the volume of semen, like.

Why does it work like a male G-spot? As in, why does stimulation for the glad (which can be reach from the anus) cause sexual release?
:dabs: it's a gland that has a lot of nerve endings and it plays a part in sex. as for it being so close to the anus, i don't think putting it in your arm would be very convenient what with it being on the urinary tract and all

callum
05-14-2006, 12:58 AM
dave for medical guy in the emo section!

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 12:59 AM
To encourage men to let other men stick their cawk up their arse.

No I don't think that's it.

What do you think it's for?

When why does it work as such? :unsure:
Slow down there tiger, what the fuck are you talking about.

Just being politically correct isn't enough. You really need to know why you think I'm an idiot.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:00 AM
but aren't there plenty of other areas around that area? It all seems a little too convenient for me. :shifty:

Oh well, maybe I'm wrong. All I know is love is a beautiful thing and I support anyone who is in a loving, consensual relationship.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 01:01 AM
dave for medical guy in the emo section!
:dabs:

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 01:03 AM
but aren't there plenty of other areas around that area? It all seems a little too convenient for me. :shifty:

Oh well, maybe I'm wrong. All I know is love is a beautiful thing and I support anyone who is in a loving, consensual relationship.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a1/Prostatelead.jpg

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 01:05 AM
but aren't there plenty of other areas around that area? It all seems a little too convenient for me. :shifty:

Oh well, maybe I'm wrong. All I know is love is a beautiful thing and I support anyone who is in a loving, consensual relationship.
C'mon, you can do better than that.

People can be in a loving, consensual relationship without anal sex.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:05 AM
Okay. :mellow:

I still support love.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 01:07 AM
but aren't there plenty of other areas around that area? It all seems a little too convenient for me. :shifty:

Oh well, maybe I'm wrong. All I know is love is a beautiful thing and I support anyone who is in a loving, consensual relationship.
C'mon, you can do better than that.

People can be in a loving, consensual relationship without anal sex.
:dabs:


it's not really anyones business but the participants rly :unsure:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:08 AM
but aren't there plenty of other areas around that area? It all seems a little too convenient for me. :shifty:

Oh well, maybe I'm wrong. All I know is love is a beautiful thing and I support anyone who is in a loving, consensual relationship. C'mon, you can do better than that.

People can be in a loving, consensual relationship without anal sex.

Well I may have no first hand experience of sex but wouldn't hand-jobs and blow-jobs just not be enough after a while?

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 01:09 AM
Okay. :mellow:

I still support love.
As do I.

I just don't see that as an argument for a man to bugger another man. The arse is for removing solid waste products. The cawk is for removing liquid waste products or for making babies.

That's the scientific position. Fact.

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:11 AM
What's the prostate glad for?

Certainly not for lack of a properly placed letter "n"....:huh:

callum
05-14-2006, 01:12 AM
Okay. :mellow:

I still support love.
As do I.

I just don't see that as an argument for a man to bugger another man. The arse is for removing solid waste products. The cawk is for removing liquid waste products or for making babies.

That's the scientific position. Fact.

Is oral sex wrong as well?

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 01:14 AM
What's the prostate glad for?

Certainly not for lack of a properly placed letter "n"....:huh:
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:14 AM
[
Well I may have no first hand experience of sex but wouldn't hand-jobs and blow-jobs just not be enough after a while?

No, they are just the icing on the c.....never mind. :rolleyes:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:14 AM
Okay. :mellow:

I still support love. As do I.

I just don't see that as an argument for a man to bugger another man. The arse is for removing solid waste products. The cawk is for removing liquid waste products or for making babies.

That's the scientific position. Fact.

So? People aren't meant to dye their hair, pierce their ears, put ink under their skin, eat pure sugar, get vaccines and get married. These things aren't "natural" but people do them and they don't harm anyone but the person doing them.

Guyver
05-14-2006, 01:15 AM
Yes.

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:16 AM
Certainly not for lack of a properly placed letter "n"....:huh:
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.

What are you trying to say?

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:16 AM
Certainly not for lack of a properly placed letter "n"....:huh: You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.

:glag: :hypocrite

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:17 AM
What's the prostate glad for?
Certainly not for lack of a properly placed letter "n"....:huh:

Oops. :blushing:

callum
05-14-2006, 01:18 AM
I was waiting for the punchline

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 01:18 AM
As do I.

I just don't see that as an argument for a man to bugger another man. The arse is for removing solid waste products. The cawk is for removing liquid waste products or for making babies.

That's the scientific position. Fact.

Is oral sex wrong as well?
As well as what?

Oh FFS, I'm going to have to ignore the fact that you can't even formulate a question properly.

No, no it isn't. The mouth is an in door. The arse is an out door. Can you understand that? It isn't that complex.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:19 AM
Blood comes out the vagina, it's an in and out door! :happy:

callum
05-14-2006, 01:23 AM
Is oral sex wrong as well?
As well as what?

Oh FFS, I'm going to have to ignore the fact that you can't even formulate a question properly.

No, no it isn't. The mouth is an in door. The arse is an out door. Can you understand that? It isn't that complex.

Your argument seems to be based on baby making parts = ok for sex, it's to be expected of someone of your age.

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:23 AM
The mouth is an in door. The arse is an out door.

Wonderfully cognitive (and lucky) analogy for someone so intellectually celibate.

Well done.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 01:23 AM
babies come out. i've never heard of one going in :smilie4:

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:24 AM
...the vagina, it's an in and out door! :happy:

All at once, too.

A miracle! :)

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 01:25 AM
As do I.

I just don't see that as an argument for a man to bugger another man. The arse is for removing solid waste products. The cawk is for removing liquid waste products or for making babies.

That's the scientific position. Fact.

So? People aren't meant to dye their hair, pierce their ears, put ink under their skin, eat pure sugar, get vaccines.
Why not. There's nothing unnatural about any of those.

Puting your babymaker into another guy's shitehole certainly is.

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:26 AM
So? People aren't meant to dye their hair, pierce their ears, put ink under their skin, eat pure sugar, get vaccines.
Why not. There's nothing unnatural about any of those.

Puting your babymaker into another guy's shitehole certainly is.

If you say so; I really can't dispute that.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 01:29 AM
if a man gets a hardon looking at another man, we shouldn't really try and work logic into the situation :smilie4:

Mr JP Fugley
05-14-2006, 01:30 AM
Why not. There's nothing unnatural about any of those.

Puting your babymaker into another guy's shitehole certainly is.

If you say so; I really can't dispute that.
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 01:31 AM
:lol:


there's been a lot of harshness on the forum recently, teh fook mang?

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:32 AM
So? People aren't meant to dye their hair, pierce their ears, put ink under their skin, eat pure sugar, get vaccines. Why not. There's nothing unnatural about any of those.

Puting your babymaker into another guy's shitehole certainly is.

I don't think so. If we lived life naturally we wouldn't purposely stick pieces of metal in ourselves and keep them their, neither would we put ink under our skin. That's not natural, it has no point in the great scheme of things just like a guy sticking his dick in another guy's ass, it serves a purpose but it has no real point to it.

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:35 AM
If you say so; I really can't dispute that.
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.

Thank God you're not really angry with me.

I thought you were serious for a moment. :)

callum
05-14-2006, 01:38 AM
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.

Thank God you're not really angry with me.

I thought you were serious for a moment. :)

That'll teach you

Sextent
05-14-2006, 01:39 AM
:lol:


there's been a lot of harshness on the forum recently, teh fook mang?
Get off the bandwagon and actually say something, or are you such a cawkless bastard that you don't want to be an individual.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 01:40 AM
:lol:


there's been a lot of harshness on the forum recently, teh fook mang?
Get off the bandwagon and actually say something, or are you such a cawkless bastard that you don't want to be an individual.
hmmm....

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:41 AM
Thank God you're not really angry with me.

I thought you were serious for a moment. :)

That'll teach you

Surely. :)

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:43 AM
Is a man sticking his cawk into a females arse wrong?
After she has given him a written permission note of course.

Don't know.

Doesn't qualify as homosexual sex, though.

callum
05-14-2006, 01:44 AM
That'll teach you

Surely. :)

You're smiling now, but just wait until you make a typo, he'll have you right up the ar... some baby making bit

Sextent
05-14-2006, 01:46 AM
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.

Thank God you're not really angry with me.

I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.

I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:48 AM
Surely. :)

You're smiling now, but just wait until you make a typo, he'll have you right up the ar... some baby making bit

I'm using protection.

I have a dictionary about somewhere; it's an old manual model, but I'll just knock the dust off 'er and she'll be good as new.

Sextent
05-14-2006, 01:51 AM
Get off the bandwagon and actually say something, or are you such a cawkless bastard that you don't want to be an individual.
hmmm....
I'm takng that as a yes.

callum
05-14-2006, 01:51 AM
Thank God you're not really angry with me.

I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.

I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.

ffs only 2 hours into sunday and i have 6 choices for my word of the week, you big word talking bastard

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:51 AM
Thank God you're not really angry with me.

I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.

I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.

Have I mentioned I have spare hyphens?

If you need them, that is.

Some people eschew them, but we're already off-topic...

j2k4
05-14-2006, 01:54 AM
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.

I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.

ffs only 2 hours into sunday and i have 6 choices for my word of the week, you big word talking bastard

Yeah, not too bad for a left-fielder.

maebach
05-14-2006, 01:58 AM
What's the prostate glad for?

for you?

callum
05-14-2006, 02:05 AM
What's the prostate glad for?

for you?

well done

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 02:07 AM
What's the prostate glad for?
for you?

:ermm: Not to make assumptions but I don't think I have one.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 02:08 AM
for you?
well done

Oh, now I get it.


...:ermm:

callum
05-14-2006, 02:11 AM
well done

Oh, now I get it.


...:ermm:

why did it take you so long. it was mentioned enough time for a canadian to pick up on it

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 02:37 AM
I thought he was ignoring the typo, which gave his comment a different meaning.

callum
05-14-2006, 02:42 AM
it's just to complicated if you think like that, i think

callum
05-14-2006, 03:32 AM
you bastard JP, it's said Homosexual Intercourse - is... callum, on the front page for the past 2 hours.

this won't have helped.

1 hour maybe, fucking board clock

missie
05-14-2006, 07:04 AM
there is nothing at all wrong with being attracted to the same sex, nothing.
if anything, it makes more sense in a sexual pleasing way as you know more about their body. as long as both are consenting adults, there isn't any reason why they shouldn't do as they wish. (to each other)

the narrow minded views of the bible needs updating fast or it's not going to survive for much longer. traditional services, like weddings and christenings, are slowly becoming something done to keep the older generation happy.


besides, you're not actually in love until you've had either anal or oral secks. :unsure:

Rip The Jacker
05-14-2006, 07:30 AM
Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Yes.

I thought everyone knew that already... =/

Draugr
05-14-2006, 08:20 AM
Homosexual Intercourse is very wrong... :sick:

I may be in the minority here, but even giving anal to a women is disgusting and unnatural to me. :ermm:

Gripper
05-14-2006, 08:36 AM
I have to say that I don't fancy the idea of http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/gripper103/buttsecksowl6ix.gif

its quite uncomfortable as it is for stuff coming out,without things being shoved iin.
The muscles in that region are designed to push stuff out,having had the Dr check up there for prostate problems with just a finger,I can tell you I wouldn't be letting anything else be shoved up there,couldn't walk properly for a couple of hours afterwards.
I think anal intercourse is wrong but homosexual loves ok if that's the way your made up.

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 09:50 AM
there is nothing at all wrong with being attracted to the same sex, nothing.

What's that got to do with anything. We're talking about cawk up the arse action.

All your "Bible" stuff is just clouding the issue. The arse is for disposing of shite, not for receiving of cawk. Scientific Fact.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 12:27 PM
What's the prostate glad for?

for you?
zomg. that's way too clever for a canadian :O

j2k4
05-14-2006, 12:29 PM
there is nothing at all wrong with being attracted to the same sex, nothing.

What's that got to do with anything. We're talking about cawk up the arse action.

All your "Bible" stuff is just clouding the issue. The arse is for disposing of shite, not for receiving of cawk. Scientific Fact.

Yeah! ;)

100%
05-14-2006, 12:42 PM
The anus may be the only place you can hide your most precious item(s) in times of need.
:pulpfiction, serbia, concentrationcamp, smuggling, etc:
and if you calculate the size and weight of your largest ever faeces you may appreciate the magnitude of its storage potential, hence a cawk is nothing, (unless jeff stryker needs to store his most precious belonging)

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 12:49 PM
The anus may be the only place you can hide your most precious item(s) in times of need.
:pulpfiction, serbia, concentrationcamp, smuggling, etc:
and if you calculate the size and weight of your largest ever faeces you may appreciate the magnitude of its storage potential, hence a cawk is nothing, (unless jeff stryker needs to store his most precious belonging)
You may store your valuables up your bumhole, that's a matter entirely for you.

I prefer a wall safe.

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 01:18 PM
I prefer a wall safe.

Why would you want to store a wall safe up your rectum :blink:

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 01:21 PM
I prefer a wall safe.

Why would you want to store a wall safe up your rectum :blink:
Safe sex.

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 01:24 PM
:rollthedrums:

/edit i knew i should've of done the pyecost line

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 01:31 PM
Pyecost ?

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 01:33 PM
About 40p ($322)

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 01:35 PM
:rollthedrums:

/edit i knew i should've of done the pyecost line

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 01:46 PM
We need a new line of entertainment :lol:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 01:56 PM
This thread sucks.

There's nothing wrong with anal sex if it's consensual. Fact.

There's nothing wrong with anything as long as it doesn't harm anyone.

DorisInsinuate
05-14-2006, 01:58 PM
This thread sucks.

There's nothing wrong with anal sex if it's consensual. Fact.

There's nothing wrong with anything as long as it doesn't harm anyone.
A 15 year old was prosecuted with statutory rape a little while ago for having consensual sex with a 11 year old girl.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 02:01 PM
That's stupid. If it was consensual they have no reason to charge him.

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 02:09 PM
That's stupid. If it was consensual they have no reason to charge him.
So, enlighten me, what age should girls be allowed to consent to sexual intercourse. Obviously 11 is old enough. How low an age would you go, or is there no lower limit.

DorisInsinuate
05-14-2006, 02:15 PM
I forgot to add the bit about the girl now being pregnant. She also smokes 20 cigarettes a day.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 02:19 PM
That's stupid. If it was consensual they have no reason to charge him. So, enlighten me, what age should girls be allowed to consent to sexual intercourse. Obviously 11 is old enough. How low an age would you go, or is there no lower limit.

There comes an age when they are not in a fit state to make such big decisions as they cannot grasp the consequences. I would discourage it as they could get pregnant (like the 11-year-old) and giving birth at such a young age can cause harm to both the mother and the child but as children they can't be held fully responsible for their actions.

Plus, the girl (and probably the boy, too) were drunk, this shouldn't have been allowed. Without the alcohol such problems may never have arose.

Virtualbody1234
05-14-2006, 02:43 PM
Without the alcohol such problems may never have arose.
Those "problems" occur, without alcohol, all the time.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 02:50 PM
This specific incident might not have, though. I certainly think there would be a drop in teenaged pregnancy if they weren't drinking so much.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 02:56 PM
i think britain would be much better if there was mandatory abortions on teenage parents

peat moss
05-14-2006, 03:01 PM
After reading the " hole " thread I thought one of the youngest members , SGgirl has one of the better attitudes on sex . Prostrate = Third Testicle I always thought . As long as both lovers are clean who cares what one does in the privacy of their own bedroom .

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 03:03 PM
people sound like they have authority if they don't end statements with IMO :smilie4:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 03:06 PM
:smilie4:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 03:08 PM
Why do I still have my Christmas signature? :lol:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 03:18 PM
Fixed! :smilie4:

Virtualbody1234
05-14-2006, 03:21 PM
Fixed! :smilie4:

Too wide.

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 03:24 PM
:glag:

ziggyjuarez
05-14-2006, 03:26 PM
A 15 year old sex with a 11 year old girl.
oh shii :o

j2k4
05-14-2006, 03:32 PM
This specific incident might not have, though. I certainly think there would be a drop in teenaged pregnancy if they weren't drinking so much.


One school of thought would counsel teen celibacy, another might surely tout avoidance of alcohol as beneficial....though from the point-of-view of a teenager, both are infringements/limitations on behaviors they might enjoy, correct?

If teenagers are to be allowed unfettered freedom of behavior, the only way either of these less problematic choices will be made would be after-the-fact, i.e., once the damage has been done.

In any case, my question would be, by what authority are teens are to be kept from alcohol, but allowed the maximum freedom to engage in whimsical sexual activity?

How do you advocate self-determination on one hand, and enact limits on the other?

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 03:48 PM
This specific incident might not have, though. I certainly think there would be a drop in teenaged pregnancy if they weren't drinking so much.

One school of thought would counsel teen celibacy, another might surely tout avoidance of alcohol as beneficial....though from the point-of-view of a teenager, both are infringements/limitations on behaviors they might enjoy, correct?

If teenagers are to be allowed unfettered freedom of behavior, the only way either of these less problematic choices will be made would be after-the-fact, i.e., once the damage has been done.

In any case, my question would be, by what authority are teens are to be kept from alcohol, but allowed the maximum freedom to engage in whimsical sexual activity?

How do you advocate self-determination on one hand, and enact limits on the other?

I simply don't want people to get hurt. I think people should do their best not to engage in activities that could lead to someone getting hurt. Alcohol should not be given to minors because it leads to situations of violence and sexual acts that could well be regretted later (although technically the same is true for adult but let's not get into that).

Sex itself is okay...as long as it's not harming anyone and under the influence of alcohol people are not in a fit condition to understand if it's going to harm anyone or not.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 03:53 PM
Let me try it this way.

Sex + consent = okay

alcohol = okay

sex + alcohol = -consent + blurred judgment

sex – consent (+ blurred judgment) = bad

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 03:58 PM
So, in short, you think a sober 11 year old girl has sufficient judgement to decide that having sexual intercourse is OK

Proper Bo
05-14-2006, 04:06 PM
lesbian secks FTW

no, it's not wrong:naughty:

manker
05-14-2006, 04:17 PM
I did start to count how many people totally didn't get the (frivolous) point JP was making with this thread - but then just decided that it was everyone else who had posted in it :dabs:

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 04:21 PM
I did start to count how many people totally didn't get the (frivolous) point JP was making with this thread - but then just decided that it was everyone else who had posted in it :dabs:
Feck, even I got it and I was pished out of my face at the time.

ziggyjuarez
05-14-2006, 04:21 PM
its ok to download it off limewire:mellow:

Mr. Mulder
05-14-2006, 04:21 PM
fags lol

j2k4
05-14-2006, 04:23 PM
Alcohol should not be given to minors...

I cannot conceive of a situation wherein a responsible adult plies a minor with alcohol, then sits back and hopes for the best.

Any adult who supplies minors (their own or others) with booze ought to be taped to an extremely large helium balloon and released to the wind, then shot down from extreme altitude.

The difficulty is minors taking the alcohol unbidden, you see?

The bottom line is, when comes to these sorts of decisions, teenagers are remarkably poor arbiters, and life-altering mistakes ensue.

This is where adults come in, for better or worse, and woe is the child whose parent(s) are intellectually/emotionally/behaviorally children themselves.

In any case, children are less "qualified" by experience to make such decisions.

Generally.

manker
05-14-2006, 04:25 PM
I did start to count how many people totally didn't get the (frivolous) point JP was making with this thread - but then just decided that it was everyone else who had posted in it :dabs:
Feck, even I got it and I was pished out of my face at the time.
JP pished of a Saturday soir.

:O :O :O

I particularly like it when you said about putting up with people who harbour delusions of adequacy.

j2k4
05-14-2006, 04:26 PM
I did start to count how many people totally didn't get the (frivolous) point JP was making with this thread - but then just decided that it was everyone else who had posted in it :dabs:

Quite right, but then we've reversed the usual process and gotten serious.

If you can rescue it immediately, I will follow your lead....I'm flexible. :)

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 04:29 PM
Feck, even I got it and I was pished out of my face at the time.
JP pished of a Saturday soir.

:O :O :O

I particularly like it when you said about putting up with people who harbour delusions of adequacy.
My favourite bit was the 15 year old putting forward well thought out and constructed arguments. Then some cawk types, "your sig's too big" at her. Not even a mod like.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 04:30 PM
Alcohol should not be given to minors...
I cannot conceive of a situation wherein a responsible adult plies a minor with alcohol, then sits back and hopes for the best.

Any adult who supplies minors (their own or others) with booze ought to be taped to an extremely large helium balloon and released to the wind, then shot down from extreme altitude.

The difficulty is minors taking the alcohol unbidden, you see?

The bottom line is, when comes to these sorts of decisions, teenagers are remarkably poor arbiters, and life-altering mistakes ensue.

"Life-altering mistakes" such as having sex? It's not such a big deal as long as they use protection so they don't get pregnant or contract STDs.

manker
05-14-2006, 04:31 PM
I did start to count how many people totally didn't get the (frivolous) point JP was making with this thread - but then just decided that it was everyone else who had posted in it :dabs:

Quite right, but then we've reversed the usual process and gotten serious.

If you can rescue it immediately, I will follow your lead....I'm flexible. :)
That's up to you.

In the meanwhile, just imagine me peering at this thread in a condescending manner, much like I imagine this smiley would if it was sentient:

:no2:

Busyman™
05-14-2006, 05:14 PM
After reading the " hole " thread I thought one of the youngest members , SGgirl has one of the better attitudes on sex . Prostrate = Third Testicle I always thought . As long as both lovers are clean who cares what one does in the privacy of their own bedroom .
Then you think it's perfectly natural for a man to stick things up his own ass for sexual pleasure? Mmk.

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 05:16 PM
Maybe just a thumb :whistling

peat moss
05-14-2006, 05:19 PM
After reading the " hole " thread I thought one of the youngest members , SGgirl has one of the better attitudes on sex . Prostrate = Third Testicle I always thought . As long as both lovers are clean who cares what one does in the privacy of their own bedroom .
Then you think it's perfectly natural for a man to stick things up his own ass for sexual pleasure? Mmk.


Only after I'v lit candles , had a nice dinner , bottle of wine . :whistling

Busyman™
05-14-2006, 05:23 PM
Then you think it's perfectly natural for a man to stick things up his own ass for sexual pleasure? Mmk.


Only after I'v lit candles , had a nice dinner , bottle of wine . :whistling
Male Ass Dildos FTW?:huh:

peat moss
05-14-2006, 05:31 PM
Only after I'v lit candles , had a nice dinner , bottle of wine . :whistling
Male Ass Dildos FTW?:huh:


Not the candle . :D In truth the thought of anal sex repulses my wife and I don't have any homo experiences to draw from but different strokes for different folks .

My wife and I have a few gay friends but could care a less would they do behind closed doors , never thought to ask them who's "Pitching or Who's catching " . ;)

j2k4
05-14-2006, 05:39 PM
I cannot conceive of a situation wherein a responsible adult plies a minor with alcohol, then sits back and hopes for the best.

Any adult who supplies minors (their own or others) with booze ought to be taped to an extremely large helium balloon and released to the wind, then shot down from extreme altitude.

The difficulty is minors taking the alcohol unbidden, you see?

The bottom line is, when comes to these sorts of decisions, teenagers are remarkably poor arbiters, and life-altering mistakes ensue.

"Life-altering mistakes" such as having sex? It's not such a big deal as long as they use protection so they don't get pregnant or contract STDs.

"Life-altering" as in pregnancy and children, or as in drinking and driving (and dying).

If it were as simple as "wear this condom/take this pill/insert this I.U.D., we'd likely not be talking about this.

Anyway, the thread seems to desire a return to a less forthright posture, and I will abide. :)

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 06:35 PM
I did start to count how many people totally didn't get the (frivolous) point JP was making with this thread - but then just decided that it was everyone else who had posted in it :dabs:

i'm not sure i got it, but it was fun anyway :unsure:

sArA
05-14-2006, 09:20 PM
My penneth worth is....no its not wrong, and no-one has the right to sit in moral judgement of what turns people on provided it is consensual.

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 09:30 PM
My penneth worth is....no its not wrong, and no-one has the right to sit in moral judgement of what turns people on provided it is consensual.
That's an interesting position.

What if someone has deeply held beliefs that something is wrong. Should they just shut the fuck up, or are they allowed to express those opinions.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 09:46 PM
My penneth worth is....no its not wrong, and no-one has the right to sit in moral judgement of what turns people on provided it is consensual. That's an interesting position.

What if someone has deeply held beliefs that something is wrong. Should they just shut the fuck up, or are they allowed to express those opinions.

But where is the line between force-feeding someone a bias opinion and expressing their opinion openly?

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 09:53 PM
That's an interesting position.

What if someone has deeply held beliefs that something is wrong. Should they just shut the fuck up, or are they allowed to express those opinions.

But where is the line between force-feeding someone a bias opinion and expressing their opinion openly?
That's very much down to the people concerned and how they go about expressing their opinion. There really is no simple answer.

However it's a bit harsh for someone to say that it's wrong for someone else to express their opinion. That's just as much censorship as the person expressing the opinion that something is wrong.

Oh wait, it is expressing the opinion that something is wrong.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 09:56 PM
But where is the line between force-feeding someone a bias opinion and expressing their opinion openly? That's very much down to the people concerned and how they go about expressing their opinion. There really is no simple answer.

However it's a bit harsh for someone to say that it's wrong for someone else
to express their opinion. That's just as much censorship as the person expresing the opinion that something is wrong.

Oh wait, it is expressing the opinion that something is wrong.
Very true, but some opinions are more socially acceptable due to common sense.

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 10:04 PM
That's very much down to the people concerned and how they go about expressing their opinion. There really is no simple answer.

However it's a bit harsh for someone to say that it's wrong for someone else
to express their opinion. That's just as much censorship as the person expresing the opinion that something is wrong.

Oh wait, it is expressing the opinion that something is wrong.
Very true, but some opinions are more socially acceptable due to common sense.
Indeed, but common sense can be a very personal thing.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 10:35 PM
Very true, but some opinions are more socially acceptable due to common sense. Indeed, but common sense can be a very personal thing.

Would you like to expand on this? I'm not sure I understand.

Fromagepas
05-14-2006, 10:44 PM
Indeed, but common sense can be a very personal thing.

Would you like to expand on this? I'm not sure I understand.
Someone may say "blah blah blah" it's just common sense.

Someone else may think that "blah blah blah" is a load of old pish and that "blag blag blag" is common sense.

"Common Sense" is a glib figure of speech and is quite frankly meaningless.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 11:01 PM
Common sense means "rational" or "coherent". What I meant by that is knowledge that universal (on the most part).

Common sense - the sky is blue on clear days
common sense - crossing the road when cars are coming is not safe
common sense - if you stick your hand under a lawn mower it might hurt a little
common sense - a person's skin colour does not affect their intelligence

Get what I'm saying?

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 11:04 PM
Common sense means "rational" or "coherent". What I meant by that is knowledge that universal (on the most part).

Common sense - the sky is blue on clear days
common sense - crossing the road when cars are coming is not safe
common sense - if you stick your hand under a lawn mower it might hurt a little
common sense - a person's skin colour does not affect their intelligence

Get what I'm saying?


No.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 11:04 PM
You're joking, right?

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 11:07 PM
skin colour / intelligence isn't common sense

Mr. Mulder
05-14-2006, 11:07 PM
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j118/prodigy692/myspack.gif

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 11:13 PM
And you never said if the lawn mower was switched on or not :snooty:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 11:14 PM
You know what I mean.

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 11:15 PM
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j118/prodigy692/myspack.gif

:glag:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 11:18 PM
skin colour / intelligence isn't common sense

I thought it was. Race doesn't affect intelligence, education does.

DorisInsinuate
05-14-2006, 11:22 PM
skin colour / intelligence isn't common sense

I thought it was. Race doesn't affect intelligence, education does.
Shut it, you know nothing, cracker.

Proper Bo
05-14-2006, 11:24 PM
If race doesn't affect intelligence, how come the chinese kids pwned at maths at school?

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 11:24 PM
:ermm:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-14-2006, 11:25 PM
If race doesn't affect intelligence, how come the chinese kids pwned at maths at school?

Better education standards.

Proper Bo
05-14-2006, 11:27 PM
If race doesn't affect intelligence, how come the chinese kids pwned at maths at school?

Better education standards.

They went to the same school as everyone else at my school:blink:

DorisInsinuate
05-14-2006, 11:28 PM
Lol, dumb savages.

http://www.kittyprint.com/KTP/Images/Asia/PiakSavagesAnam.jpg

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 11:29 PM
skin colour / intelligence isn't common sense

I thought it was. Race doesn't affect intelligence, education does.
:dabs:


the sense you were born with tells you to be afraid of people who look different. i haven't heard of any research that suggests any corrolation between race and intelligence. i presume stereotypes like asian people being doctors and stuff is down to upbringing, not genes. wait, i forgot waht i was saying

uh, yeah. education taught us to drop our prejudices. the instincts that tell us not to stick nails in our eyes, tells us to be critical of everything.

Chewie
05-14-2006, 11:34 PM
Let me try it this way.

Sex + consent = okay

alcohol = okay

sex + alcohol = -consent + blurred judgment

sex – consent (+ blurred judgment) = bad
Oh God, I always hated algebra.

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 11:35 PM
Let me try it this way.

Sex + consent = okay

alcohol = okay

sex + alcohol = -consent + blurred judgment

sex – consent (+ blurred judgment) = bad
Oh God, I always hated algebra.
get doris to give you the answers

DorisInsinuate
05-14-2006, 11:37 PM
Oh God, I always hated algebra.
get doris to give you the answers
Use your fucking common sense, you racist.

Proper Bo
05-14-2006, 11:38 PM
Yeah, everyone knows doris is too thick to do algebra:no:

GepperRankins
05-14-2006, 11:39 PM
Yeah, everyone knows doris is too thick to do algebra:no:
http://www.shoptybee.com/images/very-jeri/green-flip-flop-lrg.jpg

enoughfakefiles
05-14-2006, 11:42 PM
Are they Eygptian slippers :unsure:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 12:00 AM
Better education standards.
They went to the same school as everyone else at my school:blink:

Were their parents raised in China?

Proper Bo
05-15-2006, 12:02 AM
I'll just phone them and ask :dabs:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 12:08 AM
I'll just phone them and ask :dabs:

Well, it's just that Asian parents are very strict if their children don't get good grades. Kyo's parents basically disowned him because he chose to for-go high school. :dabs:

GepperRankins
05-15-2006, 12:09 AM
I'll just phone them and ask :dabs:

Well, it's just that Asian parents are very strict if their children don't get good grades. Kyo's parents basically disowned him because he chose to for-go high school. :dabs:
:glag:

Proper Bo
05-15-2006, 12:09 AM
I'll just phone them and ask :dabs:

Well, it's just that Asian parents are very strict if their children don't get good grades. Kyo's parents basically disowned him because he chose to for-go high school. :dabs:

It wasn't because he dresses like a cawk and makes shit music? :dabs:

ziggyjuarez
05-15-2006, 12:21 AM
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/6715/11467415884543wo.jpg
race has nothing to do with intelligence:unsure:

Proper Bo
05-15-2006, 12:23 AM
that robot is actual size and pwns at killing whales:smilie4:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 12:59 AM
Well, it's just that Asian parents are very strict if their children don't get good grades. Kyo's parents basically disowned him because he chose to for-go high school. :dabs:
It wasn't because he dresses like a cawk and makes shit music? :dabs:

What does your cawk dress like to give you the impression that Kyo dresses like one? :blink:

P.S.
Kyo doesn't write the music, he writes the lyrics and sings.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 01:00 AM
Well, it's just that Asian parents are very strict if their children don't get good grades. Kyo's parents basically disowned him because he chose to for-go high school. :dabs: :glag:

...? :unsure:

Barbarossa
05-15-2006, 02:37 PM
:glag:

...? :unsure:

I think he's implying that probably wasn't the reason... :rolleyes:

Chip Monk
05-15-2006, 04:01 PM
Kyo = Corey.

SGG = Lisa

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 06:23 PM
Kyo = Corey.

SGG = Lisa
Fair enough, :dabs: except I appreciate Kyo as an artist.

Fromagepas
05-15-2006, 06:32 PM
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=tbn:7eTJEci-v8BQqM:http://virtual.blockoland.com/content/info/assets/lisafam.gif

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 06:49 PM
Meaning?

Fromagepas
05-15-2006, 06:56 PM
Meaning?
How so, like, 15 of you, to pose one word questions.

Hessenking
05-15-2006, 07:03 PM
Hmmm,
I think its okay, let them live their own life ;)

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 08:08 PM
Meaning? How so, like, 15 of you, to pose one word questions.
Well, I am a 15-year-old. :huh:

DorisInsinuate
05-15-2006, 08:14 PM
How so, like, 15 of you, to pose one word questions.
Well, I am a 15-year-old. :huh:
Pwned.

Mr JP Fugley
05-15-2006, 08:18 PM
How so, like, 15 of you, to pose one word questions.
Well, I am a 15-year-old. :huh:
What's that got to do with it. That's your chronological age and absolutely outside of your influence.

Your attitude to life is however within your control.

Are you doing Standard Grades this year btw.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 08:28 PM
Well, I am a 15-year-old. :huh: What's that got to do with it. That's your chronological age and absolutely outside of your influence.

Your attitude to life is however within your control.

Are you doing Standard Grades this year btw.

I know, I'm on study leave. :ermm:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 08:29 PM
Rly I should be flattered that he expected any better of me.

Mr JP Fugley
05-15-2006, 08:37 PM
Rly I should be flattered that he expected any better of me.
Not at all, as I've said before you are obviously a very talented and incisive person.

DorisInsinuate
05-15-2006, 08:41 PM
http://img470.imageshack.us/img470/6939/childish1fs.gif

DorisInsinuate
05-15-2006, 08:42 PM
http://img470.imageshack.us/img470/6939/childish1fs.gif
Gheeeeeeeey, forgot to do transparency.

j2k4
05-15-2006, 08:44 PM
Rly I should be flattered that he expected any better of me.
Not at all, as I've said before you are obviously a very talented and incisive person.

Exactly so, and that makes SGG worth the bother.

We can't be arsed to traffic with idiots, after all. ;)

j2k4
05-15-2006, 08:45 PM
http://img470.imageshack.us/img470/6939/childish1fs.gif
Gheeeeeeeey, forgot to do transparency.

A purposeful brain-fart, I'm guessing.

Biggles
05-15-2006, 09:24 PM
It wasn't because he dresses like a cawk and makes shit music? :dabs:

What does your cawk dress like to give you the impression that Kyo dresses like one? :blink:


That's my girl!


:whistling

Mr JP Fugley
05-15-2006, 09:28 PM
I didn't even know you and Bo were related.

Biggles
05-15-2006, 09:28 PM
Re: subject matter...

I think what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom is their business and of no concern to anyone else (in fact those who do fret and fidget over what might be going on in someone's bedroom are in themselves a tad worrying) - but, on the other hand, I wouldn't like to see it made compulsory :ph34r:

Biggles
05-15-2006, 09:31 PM
I didn't even know you and Bo were related.

Little known secret, as indeed is the fact that Bo is a girly, although her name is a bit of a give away - what with the sheep and all. :naughty:

Buffalo
05-15-2006, 10:39 PM
Homosexual Intercourse is very wrong :glag:

Spider_dude
05-15-2006, 10:42 PM
you'd know, wronger.

GepperRankins
05-15-2006, 10:48 PM
...? :unsure:

I think he's implying that probably wasn't the reason... :rolleyes:
it was about the fact that we can't talk about genetic difference but it's fine to use cultural stereotypes

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-15-2006, 10:52 PM
I think he's implying that probably wasn't the reason... :rolleyes: it was about the fact that we can't talk about genetic difference but it's fine to use cultural stereotypes

It may be a stereotype but it's true. :dabs:

Buffalo
05-15-2006, 10:55 PM
I have had sex with a man, I don't feel bad at all about it, why should I

it was Love

GepperRankins
05-15-2006, 11:00 PM
it was about the fact that we can't talk about genetic difference but it's fine to use cultural stereotypes

It may be a stereotype but it's true. :dabs:
all stereotypes are true, but that's not the point

Mr JP Fugley
05-15-2006, 11:09 PM
I have had sex with a man, I don't feel bad at all about it, why should I

it was Love
Yeah, right, a man.

My arse.

Well your's actually.

Buffalo
05-16-2006, 12:08 AM
If a person is in love, then I can not see any harm.
Love is passion and desire, not for butt sex but for a joining of peoples emotions.

I've never had sex just for sex, Never!
I can only funtion when i have feelings for a person, I am not gay, Yes I am Bi as i have had girlfriends in the past.
My life is my life, I know i have not done wrong.
I am a very honest & sincere person.

Busyman™
05-16-2006, 12:28 AM
If a person is in love, then I can not see any harm.
Love is passion and desire, not for butt sex but for a joining of peoples emotions.

I've never had sex just for sex, Never!
I can only funtion when i have feelings for a person, I am not gay, Yes I am Bi as i have had girlfriends in the past.
My life is my life, I know i have not done wrong.
I am a very honest & sincere person.
Sex with a man, you are gay.

Man on man sex is a homosexual act. If you have had sex with women it doesn't discount the fact that you've had homosex.

Buffalo
05-16-2006, 12:35 AM
I've been with some nice people, proud of it

Busyman™
05-16-2006, 12:43 AM
I've been with some nice people, proud of it
That's great.


You're still gay.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-16-2006, 02:41 AM
Meh, who cares? It's just a lable. :dabs:

peat moss
05-16-2006, 03:32 AM
I've been with some nice people, proud of it
That's great.


You're still gay.


Sooo whats the point ? It is after all , is homo butt sex wrong ? He says no and I agree , so what if he's gay thats not the issue . ;)

thewizeard
05-16-2006, 05:53 AM
Thank God you're not really angry with me.

I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.

I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.


..and you have only been here a month, imagine what it's been like for those of us, who have been here years...

..on a side note; driving down the road today, I saw two cows, trying to have it away...what is the world coming to...

manker
05-16-2006, 08:14 AM
If a person is in love, then I can not see any harm.
Love is passion and desire, not for butt sex but for a joining of peoples emotions.

I've never had sex just for sex, Never!
I can only funtion when i have feelings for a person, I am not gay, Yes I am Bi as i have had girlfriends in the past.
My life is my life, I know i have not done wrong.
I am a very honest & sincere person.
Sex with a man, you are gay.

Man on man sex is a homosexual act. If you have had sex with women it doesn't discount the fact that you've had homosex.Sex with a woman, you are straight.

Man on woman sex is a heterosexual act. If you have had sex with a man it doesn't discount the fact that you've had heterosex.

Wait - both can't be true.

Omfg, things aren't always black and white :o

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 08:27 AM
If a person is in love, then I can not see any harm.
Love is passion and desire, not for butt sex but for a joining of peoples emotions.

I've never had sex just for sex, Never!
I can only funtion when i have feelings for a person, I am not gay, Yes I am Bi as i have had girlfriends in the past.
My life is my life, I know i have not done wrong.
I am a very honest & sincere person.
Sex with a man, you are gay.

Man on man sex is a homosexual act. If you have had sex with women it doesn't discount the fact that you've had homosex.

Self-parody ftw.

That post is the work of a genious.

I confess to a good titter on reading it.

sArA
05-16-2006, 08:46 AM
I have known several Bi people, they seem to have a pretty healthy attitude to sex within a loving relationship...i.e it is who you are with that is important, their gender is less so.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 09:02 AM
What's all this spam about love and relationships.

It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.

You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..

Barbarossa
05-16-2006, 09:08 AM
The original question was about homosexual intercourse, but now it seems you've opened it up ( :sick: ) to be about anal intercourse period.

Is there any biological difference between a man's bumhole and a woman's bumhole. Aside from the fact that women's bumholes smell of rose petals, obviousement.

manker
05-16-2006, 09:25 AM
What's all this spam about love and relationships.

It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.

You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..
Speaking of mumbo-jumbo, some cawk earlier in the thread said that oral sex wasn't wrong because the mouth was also an 'in door'.

I contend that in a certain circumstance, the arse functions perfectly well as an 'in door'.

Peristalsis must work both ways as turtle-heading is a time honoured practice in the art of avoiding shitting yourself.

Therefore if anal sex is wrong (as per thread title), oral sex must be too.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 09:57 AM
Ah, the misinformed using poorly understood science in support of their specious arguments. One of my all time favourite things.

Peristalsis is involuntary muscular movement, the fact that you may assist by a bit of voluntary downward force is not peristalsis. The retreival of a turd, via the gift of the cheek clench is also not peristalsis.

The arse is not an in door, it may be occasional used (by some deviants) as a temporary holding area, however it is not a proper way in. There is no normal biological function which requres anything being inserted. I preclude medical examination or treatment, obviousement.

manker
05-16-2006, 10:16 AM
Ah, the misinformed using poorly understood science in support of their specious arguments. One of my all time favourite things.

Peristalsis is involuntary muscular movement, the fact that you may assist by a bit of voluntary downward force is not peristalsis. The retreival of a turd, via the gift of the cheek clench is also not peristalsis.

The arse is not an in door, it may be occasional used (by some deviants) as a temporary holding area, however it is not a proper way in. There is no normal biological function which requres anything being inserted. I preclude medical examination or treatment, obviousement.Two whole paragraphs about misusing a single word.

Ah, misdirection. One of my all time ... .

Anyway. If using your arse as an 'in door' while performing the turtle-head manouvre isn't wrong then your arse can be described as an 'in door' in certain circumstances, ergo - according to the logic supplied in an earlier post - anal sex isn't wrong.

Simply put, if a mouthful of cawk can be described as 'not wrong' soley because the mouth can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'. Then an arseful of cawk can also be described as 'not wrong' because the arse can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'.

thewizeard
05-16-2006, 10:26 AM
What's all this spam about love and relationships.

It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.

You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..

Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .. That was asking for trouble.

... in the end who cares...as long as they keep it out of my anus...

Barbarossa
05-16-2006, 10:27 AM
ears are almost exclusively an in-door, but only the extremely enthusiastic would contemplate inserting their cawk into one.

I'm not buying into the "in-door" "out-door" analogy.

Oral sex performs a function, especially during foreplay, because the saliva lubricates the cawk into a heightened state of arousal in preparedness for the great vaginal escapade to follow.

Deep-throating is of course not especially conducive to this function, and is entirely a matter for the participants in question.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 10:30 AM
So, enlighten me, what would the normal, natural function be, which involved the arse as a way of getting things into the body. As stated earlier, this isn't a moral judgement we're talking about here, so try not to use those tricks again. Were talking biology.

The arse is used to get ........... into the body. This function is used in order to allow us to ........... Please fill in the blanks for me.

Barbarossa
05-16-2006, 10:35 AM
Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .. That was asking for trouble.

Intelligent Design... :whistling

Gripper
05-16-2006, 10:37 AM
Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 10:38 AM
What's all this spam about love and relationships.

It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.

You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..

Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .

Gravity.

manker
05-16-2006, 10:45 AM
So, enlighten me, what would the normal, natural function be, which involved the arse as a way of getting things into the body. As stated earlier, this isn't a moral judgement we're talking about here, so try not to use those tricks again. Were talking biology.

The arse is used to get ........... into the body. This function is used in order to allow us to ........... Please fill in the blanks for me.Oh deary me :no2:

I don't think anal nor oral sex is a normal, natural biological function to get stuff into the body. I've never said I did. A chap earlier implied disagreement with this statement in its entirety purely because of the 'in door' nature of the mouth.

I mentioned it not because I disagreed with your, Chip Monk's, post but because you mentioned mumbo-jumbo and it put me in mind of it.


I think I'll post this sentence again for no other reason than it's particularly well constructed and I'm rather fond of it; "Simply put, if a mouthful of cawk can be described as 'not wrong' soley because the mouth can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'. Then an arseful of cawk can also be described as 'not wrong' because the arse can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door' ".

manker
05-16-2006, 10:47 AM
Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.
Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.

Barbarossa
05-16-2006, 10:48 AM
Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.
Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.
So shouldn't this be in the drawing room?

manker
05-16-2006, 10:48 AM
Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .So you can PPK a girl without digital dislocation.

manker
05-16-2006, 10:52 AM
Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.
So shouldn't this be in the drawing room?
No.

I was actually implementing a clever play on words, I meant 'shit' as in fecal matter. This thread shouldn't be in the Drawing Room as the thought of other folk defacating makes those straight laced republican folk nauseous.

One must have consideration for even the anally retentive :smilie4:

jazzthefunk
05-16-2006, 10:53 AM
Live and let Live i say, :smoke: not for me but eh if ya dig it get on wi it. Watch out for the prolapses though eh, need to measure the amount you bugger each other irekons, 2 much goin up & it falls out, i know ive seen the video!!

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 11:01 AM
So, enlighten me, what would the normal, natural function be, which involved the arse as a way of getting things into the body. As stated earlier, this isn't a moral judgement we're talking about here, so try not to use those tricks again. Were talking biology.

The arse is used to get ........... into the body. This function is used in order to allow us to ........... Please fill in the blanks for me.Oh deary me :no2:

I don't think anal nor oral sex is a normal, natural biological function to get stuff into the body. I've never said I did. A chap earlier implied disagreement with this statement in its entirety purely because of the 'in door' nature of the mouth.

I mentioned it not because I disagreed with your, Chip Monk's, post but because you mentioned mumbo-jumbo and it put me in mind of it.


I think I'll post this sentence again for no other reason than it's particularly well constructed and I'm rather fond of it; "Simply put, if a mouthful of cawk can be described as 'not wrong' soley because the mouth can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'. Then an arseful of cawk can also be described as 'not wrong' because the arse can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door' ".

Ladies and Gentlemen, witness the Magnificent Slimeo. A man with a mind as slippery as an oiled racing snake. :simile:

manker
05-16-2006, 11:15 AM
You knows it ;)

Proper Bo
05-16-2006, 12:48 PM
Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .So you can PPK a girl without digital dislocation.

Wrong:no2:




And God said unto Barry, "Why are you still having casual sex with a woman in her vagina? I put an entrance right next to it which carries no risk of accidental pregnancy! Honestly..."

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 01:18 PM
And God said unto Barry, "Why are you still having casual sex with a woman in her vagina? I put an entrance right next to it which carries no risk of accidental pregnancy! Honestly..."
I've told you, it's an exit, not an entry.

Typical of you people to try to twist things with your religious prejudices and the ignoring of science.

manker
05-16-2006, 01:24 PM
If you practice turtle-heading enough, you can get it down to a fine art.

As everyone knows, art is a science - therefore, your arse being an entry can actually be thought of as scientific :smilie4:

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 03:14 PM
If you practice turtle-heading enough, you can get it down to a fine art.

As everyone knows, art is a science - therefore, your arse being an entry can actually be thought of as scientific :smilie4:
Well, now you've explained it properly I can see what you're saying.

Sorry for the musunderstanding, I take it all back.

/Moved to Lounge as the issue is resolved.

thewizeard
05-16-2006, 04:11 PM
..surely "Funny Stuff" would be more appropriate ..

Proper Bo
05-16-2006, 04:31 PM
I've told you, it's an exit, not an entry.

Typical of you people to try to twist things with your religious prejudices and the ignoring of science.

Are you saying god doesn't exist?:shocked:

manker
05-16-2006, 04:51 PM
If you practice turtle-heading enough, you can get it down to a fine art.

As everyone knows, art is a science - therefore, your arse being an entry can actually be thought of as scientific :smilie4:
Well, now you've explained it properly I can see what you're saying.

Sorry for the musunderstanding, I take it all back.

/Moved to Lounge as the issue is resolved.It was the smiley that cleared up the confunction once and for all, wasn't it.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-16-2006, 05:51 PM
I don't care if the arse is an 'in door', an 'out door' or both. I don't think nature comes into it, if you want to be completely natural take of all your cloths and go live in a cave. No processed food, no toothpaste, no contraception, no shopping, no computers, etc. etc. :dabs:

DorisInsinuate
05-16-2006, 06:00 PM
/moved to apathyworld

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 06:02 PM
I don't think nature comes into it
How would one decide on what is unnatural without in some way examining nature. That's just mad talk.

It's people like you bringing morality into it which spoils things.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-16-2006, 06:08 PM
Well then, the question is: Are unnatural acts wrong?

I say hell no, I like my computer and I want to get my nose pierced.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 06:11 PM
Well then, the question is: Are unnatural acts wrong?

I pray to God that you inserted that colon in an ironic manner.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-16-2006, 06:45 PM
I:m 15: I:ll put: :colon:s wherever: I se:e fit:

enoughfakefiles
05-16-2006, 07:07 PM
I:m 15: I:ll put: :colon:s wherever: I se:e fit:

OOooooooooooooooo

http://www.funkist.ca/images/products/purses/daisy%20handbag.jpg

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-16-2006, 07:15 PM
I want to burn that bag.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 07:19 PM
So long as you don't put it in someone's colon.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-16-2006, 07:25 PM
That's an awful joke.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 07:26 PM
That's an offal joke.
:lol:

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-16-2006, 07:30 PM
So was that.

DorisInsinuate
05-16-2006, 07:33 PM
Arrrrrgse jokes ahoy! Off the starboard bow.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 07:34 PM
Oh sorry, I thought you were making that joke.

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-16-2006, 07:48 PM
Even if I was you shouldn't have laughed.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 07:57 PM
Even if I was you shouldn't have laughed.
I though it rather good, even if you weren't making it.

Busyman™
05-16-2006, 09:26 PM
That's great.


You're still gay.


Sooo whats the point ? It is after all , is homo butt sex wrong ? He says no and I agree , so what if he's gay thats not the issue . ;)
I never said it was. You didn't say "what's the point" when Celebs said he wasn't gay.

Busyman™
05-16-2006, 09:31 PM
What's all this spam about love and relationships.

It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.

You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..

Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .. That was asking for trouble.

... in the end who cares...as long as they keep it out of my anus...
:lol: :lol:

Busyman™
05-16-2006, 10:30 PM
Sex with a man, you are gay.

Man on man sex is a homosexual act. If you have had sex with women it doesn't discount the fact that you've had homosex.Sex with a woman, you are straight.

Man on woman sex is a heterosexual act. If you have had sex with a man it doesn't discount the fact that you've had heterosex.

Wait - both can't be true.

Omfg, things aren't always black and white :o
Sure it is. Fella slams another fella in da butt, he's gay.

Ahh but as SGG says, they are just lables labels.

The act and the label can be quite different. However, I equate that homosexual act with the label.

I don't use the label to necessarily be exclusionary. Gay fellas have wives ffs. I'm not going to stop calling them gay. They like fucking men (or getting fucked by them).

At the same time I equate 'straight' as being exclusionary. I do not consider gay and straight as being opposites.

Here's a mini-poll for the fellas:

If one of your male friends all-of-sudden tells you he likes to have sex with guys, would you consider him gay?

I would. It would be black-and-white for me....since we are dealing with mere labels and all.

Chip Monk
05-16-2006, 10:37 PM
Sex with a woman, you are straight.

Man on woman sex is a heterosexual act. If you have had sex with a man it doesn't discount the fact that you've had heterosex.

Wait - both can't be true.

Omfg, things aren't always black and white :o
Sure it is. Fella slams another fella in da butt, he's gay.

Ahh but as SGG says, they are just lables labels.

The act and the label can be quite different. However, I equate that homosexual act with the label.

I don't use the label to necessarily be exclusionary. Gay fellas have wives ffs. I'm not going to stop calling them gay. They like fucking men (or getting fucked by them).

At the same time I equate 'straight' as being exclusionary. I do not consider gay and straight as being opposites.

Here's a mini-poll for the fellas:

If one of your male friends all-of-sudden tells you he likes to have sex with guys, would you consider him gay?

I would. It would be black-and-white for me....since we are dealing with mere labels and all.


Now that's a "mini poll" for you.

1 option and then you tell us what you think.

Fan-tastic.

peat moss
05-17-2006, 01:32 AM
Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.


Gripper , I thought that too , we could title it "Exit only" . :)

ziggyjuarez
05-17-2006, 02:42 AM
you guys talkn about nothing again?

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-17-2006, 01:43 PM
Hells yeah!

Voetsek
05-17-2006, 07:58 PM
may I watch or something

TimeRavine
05-18-2006, 06:33 PM
Flaming for the win!

SpatulaGeekGirl
05-18-2006, 08:42 PM
http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/1431/shutup4lf.gif