I am going to come in my pants again

[Squeamous]

Star Trek Movie (http://www.startrekmovie.com/)

[CrabGirl]

/Whimper.

[Squeamous]

With that Richard Dawkins prog on tonight this is going to be a very tiring day for me :mellow:.

[CrabGirl]

A very sticky pants day.

[Squeamous]

:happy:

[The Flying Cow]

You sure do come an awful lot.

Are you a squirter, though?

:huh:

[Squeamous]

Half an hour before the Dawkins! I'll let you know!

[The Flying Cow]

I'll let you know!

Wot after the Dawkins?

[Agrajag]

Star Trek Movie (http://www.startrekmovie.com/)

I may as well.

Come in my pants like, not yours.

[Agrajag]

Not with that injunction in force.

[Squeamous]

I'll let you know!

Wot after the Dawkins?

Well I didn't squirt, but I did have a one sided rant at my OH where he looked a bit resigned and asked 'are you going to lecture me again?' :pinch:

Kind of dampened the ardour :snooty:

[The Flying Cow]

Is he a Christian?

[Agrajag]

Is he a Christian?

Don't dabble in rodding, young one.

[CrabGirl]

Wot after the Dawkins?

Well I didn't squirt, but I did have a one sided rant at my OH where he looked a bit resigned and asked 'are you going to lecture me again?' :pinch:

Kind of dampened the ardour :snooty:

Oh god. I do that. Cheese just looks at me and shifts uncomfortably whilst I rant on and on and on.

[Sanka113]

Look's like you're going to "double bag it" so that you can last through the entire movie.

[Squeamous]

Oh god. I do that. Cheese just looks at me and shifts uncomfortably whilst I rant on and on and on.

He probably knows he's not really required to contribute to the 'conversation' :noes:

Nope, he's not a Christian. Anyway, it suddenly hit me that Dawkins was wrong and had reached some pretty spurious conclusions. I was actually arguing in favour of religion :pinch:.

[Barbarossa]

Oh god. I do that. Cheese just looks at me and shifts uncomfortably whilst I rant on and on and on.

He probably knows he's not really required to contribute to the 'conversation' :noes:

Nope, he's not a Christian. Anyway, it suddenly hit me that Dawkins was wrong and had reached some pretty spurious conclusions. I was actually arguing in favour of religion :pinch:.

Dawkins very cleverly glossed over the things they don't know in order to hammer home the things that they do know, while at every available opportunity having a swipe at religion :mellow:

That's not exactly helpful to the cause. Also, I didn't really learn anything new. Also I found his attitude pretty annoying.

Oh, and the biggest question Darwin couldn't answer wasn't how traits are passed from one generation to the next, but how life began in the first place. Evolution still hasn't got an answer for that, and it's never ever been recreated in a laboratory.

I'm hoping for something better in the next two programmes to be honest. Also I'm pretty sure he planted those fossils on the beach, I've been to Lyme Regis loads of times and never found anything that good :sly:

[Squeamous]

Oh it has been recreated in the laboratory Barbie. Miller-Urey Experiment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller-Urey_experiment). Don't forget the Earth is 4.6 billion years old, and we didn't even get crustaceans and the like until 570ma. That's several billions of years for a primordial soup of inorganic molecules and chemicals to combine to make organic ones, and to eventually make the bulding blocks of life.

That's not what concerns me though. It's hard to explain without going off on one, and since you're not married to me I'll let you off that particular unpleasantness. In short I feel that evolution is an undeniable fact, but just because evolution through natural selection exists doesn't mean it's responsible for major evolutionary leaps like limb formation or eyes. It's only ever been proven on a short and minor scale and I feel like Dawkins is making the mistake of extrapolating too much information from very little.

If I were 'the Creator' and I wanted to create life I would go about it in a very scientific way. I'd think 'how do I do this with the least effort, ensuring life can change and grow independently of me?' I'd create a code that could be altered to make an almost infinate number of permutations, enough to cope with any flux in environment, and then I'd use that, switching bits on and off to create novel features and body plans. When my work was done I'd disappear and let natural selection drive changes, and then maybe as time went by and I noticed my experiment coming along nicely I'd think 'wow, the planet's doing well but it needs a bit here and there'. God could have been a glorified terra former for all we know, creating certain types of life at the right time by altering the code to allow the Earth to go from a volcanic wasteland to the blue sphere it is now.

For all we know a creator could have been engineering all the great modifications that separate life into the larger groups and then allowed life to progress into the smaller modifications.

Not that I believe in God you understand :fear:

[Squeamous]

Oh and I might show you my fossils tonight :yup:.....I found a trilobite and an ancient sea urchin on the beach :w00t:

[Barbarossa]

Oh it has been recreated in the laboratory Barbie. Miller-Urey Experiment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller-Urey_experiment).

Fuck me, why doesn't someone tell Bill Bryson! :O

Actually, that's really interesting stuff.

[Barbarossa]

Oh and I might show you my fossils tonight :yup:.....I found a trilobite and an ancient sea urchin on the beach :w00t:

Yeah, right :snooty:

[Squeamous]

In the 50's too!

I promise to show you my fossils...there will that do? :shifty:

[Barbarossa]

I suppose it will have to :smilie4:

[CrabGirl]

OooOOH Can I see your fossils?

[Acid_death69]

OooOOH Can I see your fossils?
its not the first time you've said that:whistling;)

[Squeamous]

OooOOH Can I see your fossils?

Ok :happy:

I think the one on the right is an irregular echinoid super order atelostomata and is about 200 million years old!!!! and the one on the left is a trilobite, order phacopida I think and it's about 500 million years old. I don't know much about this stuff though admittedly, so they may just be old fossilised socks I've identified wrongly or something :unsure:

http://i35.tinypic.com/m5w95.jpg

[CrabGirl]

I've just come in my pants. :wub:

[Guillaume]

I think the one on the right is an irregular echinoid super order atelostomata and is about 200 million years old!!!! and the one on the left is a trilobite, order phacopida I think and it's about 500 million years old.
Not possible, since the Earth will be 6000 years old (next Tuesday around 10 PM).

[Biggles]

Abiogenesis is an interesting subject but it is not actually Darwin's area of study. Origin of the Species deals with what happens after life has begun.

I thought Dawkins was pretty mellow compared to previous outings :dabs:

It is true that he has an axe to grind but a quick visit to a young earth creationist site makes him sound like the very voice of reason.

[Agrajag]

I always get annoyed at young earth creationists and the like.

They give proper people a bad name.

Just because one believes in God doesn't mean one has to ignore perfectly good science.

[Biggles]

I think there is added kudos if several mad things are believed before breakfast in some circles.

[Acid_death69]

I always get annoyed at young earth creationists and the like.

They give proper people a bad name.

Just because one believes in God doesn't mean one has to ignore perfectly good science.
agreed:yup:

[Squeamous]

I've just come in my pants. :wub:

But I'm talking complete schist :unsure:

:pinch:

[Squeamous]

Abiogenesis is an interesting subject but it is not actually Darwin's area of study. Origin of the Species deals with what happens after life has begun.

I thought Dawkins was pretty mellow compared to previous outings :dabs:

It is true that he has an axe to grind but a quick visit to a young earth creationist site makes him sound like the very voice of reason.

I don't think Dawkins really covered abiogenesis, he sort of started in the precambrian and then went on to explain how organisms evolved. The problem is, that would have been a really good starting point but as you say he is focusing on Darwin to disprove religion, and as a result the most important part - the origin of life, has fallen by the wayside. That's one of the biggest stumbling blocks people often have when being asked to believe that there was no creator. He's missed out on the chance to discuss it so he can dig up a dead man to lend more credibility to his dogma.

[Barbarossa]

I can't stop thinking about all this, it's doing my head in :pinch:

Why does life care so much if it survives or not. :unsure:

[Something Else]

Because it has to be all importantly, short-term, self-preserving by nature to survive. Or did. :01:

[Barbarossa]

But why?

There you are, a tiny blob of organic compounds in a bowl of primordial soup, why isn't that enough for you, why do you need to be any more than that :blink:

[Squeamous]

It's all down to DNA Barbie.

You know, for instance, you find a woman's hips sexy? Well, you find them sexy because it helps your DNA reproduce. You're just the vehicle that carries them, and you are there to service them. Your body is just an elaborate vessel designed to preserve them. And it's not their fault, because the way they're constructed means they produce substances that interact with their environment. When they first arose and started producing those substances it made sense that the ones that produced substances that helped them perpetuate would be most successful. Life is basically a code that passively and inexorably evolves completely thoughtlessly. There is no point but to just be.

[Acid_death69]

It's all down to DNA Barbie.

You know, for instance, you find a woman's hips sexy? Well, you find them sexy because it helps your DNA reproduce. You're just the vehicle that carries them, and you are there to service them. Your body is just an elaborate vessel designed to preserve them. And it's not their fault, because the way they're constructed means they produce substances that interact with their environment. When they first arose and started producing those substances it made sense that the ones that produced substances that helped them perpetuate would be most successful. Life is basically a code that passively and inexorably evolves completely thoughtlessly. There is no point but to just be.
that actually made sense to me, never thought of just being a car for my DNA:P brum brum

[Squeamous]

Makes you feel quite insignificant don't it? :cry:

[The Flying Cow]

I quite like it.

Keeps things simple, like. Objectives and that.

[Squeamous]

Agreed. But some people need to feel important and special, and that's where God comes in :dry:.

Some research has shown that the more educated you are the less intelligent you think you are...wonder if that could be said for ego too?

[The Flying Cow]

I don't feel important and special, and I believe in God.

Didn't really get that correlation there.

[Squeamous]

I believe that most people need to feel they were created for a purpose because they can't handle the idea that they are completely insignificant.

[Barbarossa]

It's all down to DNA Barbie.

You know, for instance, you find a woman's hips sexy? Well, you find them sexy because it helps your DNA reproduce. You're just the vehicle that carries them, and you are there to service them. Your body is just an elaborate vessel designed to preserve them. And it's not their fault, because the way they're constructed means they produce substances that interact with their environment. When they first arose and started producing those substances it made sense that the ones that produced substances that helped them perpetuate would be most successful. Life is basically a code that passively and inexorably evolves completely thoughtlessly. There is no point but to just be.

Very well put, thanks :cool:

[Acid_death69]

I believe that most people need to feel they were created for a purpose because they can't handle the idea that they are completely insignificant.
i know whatya mean, i just like toddeling through life, does go really fast though:pinch:

[Squeamous]

i know whatya mean, i just like toddeling through life, does go really fast though:pinch:

Wait until you hit your late 20's :pinch:. All of a sudden you're running just to keep up with the future.

[Barbarossa]

I believe that most people need to feel they were created for a purpose because they can't handle the idea that they are completely insignificant.

I think the notion that you are completely insignificant is quite liberating in a way. :happy:

Then the only thing left to do is make yourself and those around you as happy and comfortable as possible :hippy:

[Squeamous]

Totally agree Barbie. I read somewhere a quote that went along the lines of 'the meaning of life is to find what you enjoy and do it' :happy:

[Acid_death69]

Totally agree Barbie. I read somewhere a quote that went along the lines of 'the meaning of life is to find what you enjoy and do it' :happy:
i read something close to that. Also heard that the meaning of life is to find love and to pass on your DNA

[Squeamous]

Also something to aspire to :happy:

[Biggles]

Totally agree Barbie. I read somewhere a quote that went along the lines of 'the meaning of life is to find what you enjoy and do it' :happy:


It is 42 Shirley!

It is also important to note that Douglas Adams owned a vineyard in France called Quarante Deux.

[Squeamous]

I'm aware of his work :ghey: :snooty:

[Guillaume]

It is also important to note that Douglas Adams owned a vineyard in France called Quarante Deux.
A Brit in southern France, what a surprise. :dry:

[Biggles]

I'm aware of his work :ghey: :snooty:

:lol:

Most people read his books but you went for the wine. :dabs:

[Squeamous]

How dare you! I drink the good shit!

[Biggles]

How dare you! I drink the good shit!


:idunno: I certainly start out with good intentions but the bar lowers as the evening wears on.

[Squeamous]

Back away from the meths Biggles!!!

[Biggles]

Back away from the meths Biggles!!!

:snooty:


I absolutely draw the line at gas pumped through milk.

[Skweeky]

Sparkling milk? What's that like? :o

[Barbarossa]

Apparently it's the foulest concoction ever conceived :sick:

There are plenty of stories on the internets about people putting milk in a sodastream. None of them good...

[Acid_death69]

blerghh i dont like milk in the first place, putting bubbles in it wont make me change my mind

[The Flying Cow]

Nothing like yon milk from the lady's teat.

Fresh, like. :)

[Skweeky]

Weirdo.

[Squeamous]

I wonder how many men of the board have tried it? I watched a documentary on a family of freaks once, and the woman was breastfeeding two kids of 8 and 6 still, and laughed that she sometimes had to give her husband a go in case he got jealous. I remember thinking at the time, 'if anybody ever needed a kick in the balls, it's him'.

[Acid_death69]

I wonder how many men of the board have tried it? I watched a documentary on a family of freaks once, and the woman was breastfeeding two kids of 8 and 6 still, and laughed that she sometimes had to give her husband a go in case he got jealous. I remember thinking at the time, 'if anybody ever needed a kick in the balls, it's him'.
thats like lil britian:wacko: bitty:P

[Squeamous]

It's bloddy 'gustin, is what it is :snooty:

[Something Else]

I wonder how many men of the board have tried it? I watched a documentary on a family of freaks once, and the woman was breastfeeding two kids of 8 and 6 still, and laughed that she sometimes had to give her husband a go in case he got jealous. I remember thinking at the time, 'if anybody ever needed a kick in the balls, it's him'.

Coincimental. :O

I watched a vid about that woman on youtube last night. :O

[Squeamous]

:fear:

What was your excuse? :shifty:

[The Flying Cow]

Thirst, I'd conjecture.

[brotherdoobie]

Have you pissed your pants, dear? I find that sexy. I would love to see pics of your soaking wet, floral printed, cotton panties.


-bd :mellow:

[Something Else]

:fear:

What was your excuse? :shifty:

I stayed up all night looking for weird nature videos for that thread I made. That was one of them that didn't make the grade. True story.

[JROQuinn]

i crap my pants like they do in the http://shockingtube.com/ vids

its rather satisfying & self cleansing

[puckface]

I wonder how many men of the board have tried it? I watched a documentary on a family of freaks once, and the woman was breastfeeding two kids of 8 and 6 still, and laughed that she sometimes had to give her husband a go in case he got jealous. I remember thinking at the time, 'if anybody ever needed a kick in the balls, it's him'.

all i gotta say is... yum

[Squeamous]

Have you pissed your pants, dear? I find that sexy. I would love to see pics of your soaking wet, floral printed, cotton panties.


-bd :mellow:

Shermanator, get your coat, you've pulled :fear:

Ben - How can you class breast feeding an adult man as 'nature'?

[brotherdoobie]

You'll have to excuse my lout like behavior, last night, dear.

-bd

[Acid_death69]

i thought it was funny, ya seemed to be making a tit or ya self yet it seems you didnt make a single spelling mistake:) a capable drunk

[Squeamous]

You'll have to excuse my lout like behavior, last night, dear.

-bd

I wouldn't have minded so much, but cotton floral knickers? :ghey:

[brotherdoobie]

You'll have to excuse my lout like behavior, last night, dear.

-bd

I wouldn't have minded so much, but cotton floral knickers? :ghey:

I have thing for cotton panties with flower prints.


-bd :mellow:

[Hairbautt]

This thread makes me soooooooooooo horny.

[brotherdoobie]

^ Cotton panties with floral prints >*


-bd

[Hairbautt]

:unsure: I don't think I own any...

[Hairbautt]

But I have sisters so let me check.

[Something Else]

/pics

[The Flying Cow]

Shermanator, get your coat, you've pulled :fear:

:blink:

[brotherdoobie]

/pics

I wonder if he has the balls. From what I have heard his sisters run the house.

We'll see.


-bd :ermm:

[Acid_death69]

maybe he wont have any balls after his sisters catch him with their knickers

[Barbarossa]

But I have my sisters on so let me check.

Fixed :dabs:

[Squeamous]

I wouldn't have minded so much, but cotton floral knickers? :ghey:

I have thing for cotton panties with flower prints.


-bd :mellow:

Like this?

http://pics2.spoonfeeder.com/AieFTPFiles/AIEUser/563GP9ASFACS/STKJKB5G4VAX.jpg

:pinch:

[Squeamous]

Or this?

[/URL][URL]http://www.topshop.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?beginIndex=0&viewAllFlag=true&catalogId=19551&storeId=12556&categoryId=115996&parent_category_rn=58908&productId=756140&langId=-1 (http://flowery pants 1)

http://www.topshop.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?beginIndex=0&viewAllFlag=&catalogId=19551&storeId=12556&categoryId=58909&parent_category_rn=58908&productId=780843&langId=-1 (http://flowery pants 2)

http://www.topshop.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?beginIndex=0&viewAllFlag=true&catalogId=19551&storeId=12556&categoryId=58909&parent_category_rn=58908&productId=756815&langId=-1 (http://flowery pants 3)

I really should find better things to do on a Saturday than go pant pimpin' :(

[The Flying Cow]

As an aside, those are quite scrumptious, Squeam.

The panties, I mean.

[Squeamous]

They're not that expensive either. I will not spend more money on undies though :ermm:

[Mr JP Fugley]

:lol::earl

I cannot believe that you are posting links to top shop pants and VillageBuffoon congratulated you on them.

You couldn't fucking write it.

[condom-man]

you will stop coming in your pants when you have to do the washing

[Squeamous]

You would have understood 30 years ago JP :yup:

[Something Else]

I don't understand and i'm thirty years ago. :blink:

[Squeamous]

He's not that old is he? :O

[Biggles]

Watched all three Dawkins' programmes and enjoyed them. I would have only made two though and seriously edited out the fundamentalist tripe. :dabs: The second one was the best - all science zero religion.