PDA

View Full Version : Do People Get Moderated?



MediaSlayer
12-08-2003, 06:11 AM
I would like to know if people can get moderated for bumping dumb shit like this (http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=5341&st=60), and if not, why? what are your thoughts on this?

asmithz
12-08-2003, 06:39 AM
That is posted by paul, and paul can post what he wants.

Adster
12-08-2003, 06:48 AM
i think it woudl be realyl stupdi to get moderated for bumping threads look at the ruels is there a rule saying bumping threads we do not allow

Arm
12-08-2003, 06:58 AM
:blink: You cant get moderated for that but you can get moderated for posting links to Goatsex too many times and disrespeacting a mod. <_<

MediaSlayer
12-08-2003, 06:59 AM
Originally posted by Agent Smith@8 December 2003 - 06:39
That is posted by paul, and paul can post what he wants.
look at the dates, agent dumbass

http://www.chinkii.com/uploads/album/misc/dumbass.JPG

balamm
12-08-2003, 07:02 AM
That&#39;s a really important topic. Of course I&#39;m all in favour of it. Here&#39;s my first contribution :)




Yes, by all means, let&#39;s have a porn world.


<_<

Edit: pic is gone after multiple complaints

james_bond_rulez
12-08-2003, 07:03 AM
balamm i expected better from you... <_<

MediaSlayer
12-08-2003, 07:05 AM
that&#39;s exactly what i&#39;m talking about, if people bump things that are clearly irrelevant and useless, is that ok? i&#39;m thinking once in a while, it&#39;s ok but maybe there should be some type of unofficial limit on that type of thing? or am i out of order?

titey
12-08-2003, 07:29 AM
Originally posted by balamm@8 December 2003 - 01:02
Edit: pic gone after multiple complaints

:o Gee b.... I didn&#39;t know you&#39;d reconciled........an&#39; wif both yer ex-wives at the same time&#33; http://piczonline.com/client/titey/LOL.gif

Rip The Jacker
12-08-2003, 07:31 AM
balamm thats just sick. :x

thewizeard
12-08-2003, 07:38 AM
Originally posted by MediaSlayer@8 December 2003 - 06:11
I would like to know if people can get moderated for bumping dumb shit like this (http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=5341&st=60), and if not, why? what are your thoughts on this?
Not a good idea..you ask titey, I do it regularly&#33; In fact nearly 99% of what is written here is dumb-sh*t &#33; (Using your words) :lol:

Jayhawk
12-08-2003, 07:43 AM
:x i think i am gonna throw up

titey
12-08-2003, 07:44 AM
Originally posted by nigel123@8 December 2003 - 01:38
Not a good idea..you ask titey, I do it regularly&#33;
In fact nearly 99% of what is written here is dumb-sh*t &#33; (Using your words) :lol:

http://piczonline.com/client/titey/yes.gif Yes, I can verify........nigel is a dumb-sh*t. :)














:unsure: That is what you meant, right?

MediaSlayer
12-08-2003, 07:44 AM
i just assumed that people would realize i&#39;m talking about old threads when i said "bumping"

i assumed wrong. sorray for makin&#39; an ASS outta U and ME :( , mostly me :)

ok so everybody, i am talking about ancient threads, as in threads that are older than 6 months, the one in the link i posted was almost one year old.

thewizeard
12-08-2003, 07:46 AM
Originally posted by titey+8 December 2003 - 07:44--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (titey @ 8 December 2003 - 07:44)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-nigel123@8 December 2003 - 01:38
Not a good idea..you ask titey, I do it regularly&#33;
In fact nearly 99% of what is written here is dumb-sh*t &#33; (Using your words) :lol:

http://piczonline.com/client/titey/yes.gif Yes, I can verify........nigel is a dumb-sh*t. :)













:unsure: That is what you meant, right? [/b][/quote]
uhmmm something like that, yes er no er alright ok YES&#33; :lol:

Evil Gemini
12-08-2003, 07:48 AM
Originally posted by james_bond_rulez@8 December 2003 - 08:03
balamm i expected better from you... <_<
:lol: :lol:

I didnt :P

Adster
12-08-2003, 07:54 AM
Originally posted by MediaSlayer@8 December 2003 - 17:44
i just assumed that people would realize i&#39;m talking about old threads when i said "bumping"

i assumed wrong. sorray for makin&#39; an ASS outta U and ME :( , mostly me :)

ok so everybody, i am talking about ancient threads, as in threads that are older than 6 months, the one in the link i posted was almost one year old.
for a start this is a serious thread so you know where you should have posted it&#33; :lol:

It really depends on the contents of the thread. if it was a flame thread and it was bumped to course trouble yes, but for example Paul&#39;s thread I don&#39;t see anything wrong with it, well not enough for moderation anyway

MediaSlayer
12-08-2003, 07:58 AM
i agree ad. the pron thread was kinda silly to bump it, can a poll from then count for now? no, so that&#39;s why it was silly. but there isn&#39;t much harm in it either, i was just asking if somebody came along and starting doing it all the time, either to bump a flame thread or to bump completely irrelevant threads, if they would get in trouble(like if they started bumping several old internet news threads per night). so it sounds like they probably wouldn&#39;t get moderated. but "fun bumping" i understand it&#39;s ok, just was wondering what would happen if someone went crazy with it.

thewizeard
12-08-2003, 08:00 AM
It makes one wonder what the point is of some of these polls because with regards to the porn poll even though there was a majority who wanted a porn world. It never came and probably never will.

Adster
12-08-2003, 08:02 AM
Originally posted by nigel123@8 December 2003 - 18:00
It makes one wonder what the point is of some of these polls because with regards to the porn poll even though there was a majority who wanted a porn world. It never came and probably never will.
yeah its quite ironic isn&#39;t it

Lamsey
12-08-2003, 10:26 AM
Originally posted by nigel123@8 December 2003 - 07:00
It makes one wonder what the point is of some of these polls because with&nbsp; regards to the porn poll even though there was a majority who wanted a porn world. It never came and probably never will.
It&#39;sa so the administrators or mods can get a feel for what the strength of feeling is about a subject. It&#39;s not like an election - the vote&#39;s just for information, and is only one of the factors we (the team) take into consideration when making a decision.

Remember that this board is not a democracy. The admins call the shots, and the mods enforce their rules.

MediaSlayer
12-08-2003, 10:30 AM
you should factor in the fact that you look like j. mascis in that hat

j/k of course

Cheese
12-08-2003, 11:22 AM
You do realise that in about six months somebody&#39;s going to bump THIS thread :lol:

MediaSlayer
12-08-2003, 06:56 PM
nnnnoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo please, please no-one do that&#33;&#33;&#33; :ermm:

it would be tragic

Cheese
12-08-2003, 07:04 PM
Originally posted by MediaSlayer@8 December 2003 - 17:56
nnnnoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo please, please no-one do that&#33;&#33;&#33; :ermm:

it would be tragic
now someone&#39;s DEFINETLY goiny to bump this thread in the future :lol: :lol: :lol:


I promise it won&#39;t be me ;)

Spindulik
12-08-2003, 09:32 PM
Originally posted by MediaSlayer@8 December 2003 - 02:11
I would like to know if people can get moderated for bumping dumb shit like this (http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=5341&st=60), and if not, why? what are your thoughts on this?
I just briefly looked at the rules. I used "word search" and did not see anything that states "bump" or "bumping".

So what exactly is "bumping"?

Benno
12-08-2003, 10:18 PM
Originally posted by MediaSlayer@8 December 2003 - 08:58
i agree ad. the pron thread was kinda silly to bump it, can a poll from then count for now? no, so that&#39;s why it was silly. but there isn&#39;t much harm in it either, i was just asking if somebody came along and starting doing it all the time, either to bump a flame thread or to bump completely irrelevant threads, if they would get in trouble(like if they started bumping several old internet news threads per night). so it sounds like they probably wouldn&#39;t get moderated. but "fun bumping" i understand it&#39;s ok, just was wondering what would happen if someone went crazy with it.
I think inter.news got moderated for bumping to many old threads :unsure:

hobbes
12-08-2003, 10:48 PM
What was balamms picture? It can&#39;t be any worse than his avatar, can it?

Lamsey
12-08-2003, 11:38 PM
Originally posted by hobbes@8 December 2003 - 21:48
What was balamms picture? It can&#39;t be any worse than his avatar, can it?
It was.

It involved a couple of (old) whales having a threesome with an (old) stick-insect-like bloke.

Absolutely sickening.

james_bond_rulez
12-08-2003, 11:40 PM
:lol:

TheDave
12-08-2003, 11:40 PM
what was the thing with clockers sig?

hobbes
12-08-2003, 11:52 PM
Originally posted by TheDave@9 December 2003 - 00:40
what was the thing with clockers sig?
Apparently Clocker was unable to assemble an inspiring enough signature to merit display, so the Mods had to step in, regretfully, and remove his mundane offering.

He is getting old you know, sometimes people just find him wandering the different "worlds" looking dazed. He once PM&#39;ed me that he was lost in "hardware world" and could I help return him to the lounge. I think, Lamsey, on more than one occasion has found him passed out in "bookworld" and covered the poor boy up with a cyberblanket.

TheDave
12-09-2003, 12:01 AM
Originally posted by hobbes+8 December 2003 - 23:52--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hobbes @ 8 December 2003 - 23:52)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-TheDave@9 December 2003 - 00:40
what was the thing with clockers sig?
Apparently Clocker was unable to assemble an inspiring enough signature to merit display, so the Mods had to step in, regretfully, and remove his mundane offering.

He is getting old you know, sometimes people just find him wandering the different "worlds" looking dazed. He once PM&#39;ed me that he was lost in "hardware world" and could I help return him to the lounge. I think, Lamsey, on more than one occasion has found him passed out in "bookworld" and covered the poor boy up with a cyberblanket. [/b][/quote]
:lol: :lol: :lol: really? :ermm:

clocker
12-09-2003, 12:14 AM
No, not really.
It is warmer up there.
MagicNakor really appreciates the benefits of a roaring fire and keeps the hearth up there well stocked and tended.
Occasionally one may drift into a deeper state of contemplation, easily mistaken by the young for sleep.
This is sometimes accompanied by drooling.
Not to worry.

As for my sig.
Apparently, several board members came to the conclusion that my sig contained secret messages and complained to the mods. After vociferously ( there&#39;s a word for another thread, hobbes) defending my 12th Amendment right to display nonsensical, or potentially libelous, sigs, my beloved sig was unilaterally wiped clean.
I am over it, and being the bigger man that I am, forgive the misguided souls at the root of the dispute.

TheDave
12-09-2003, 12:16 AM
how was this alleged stuff encoded? :blink:

bigboab
12-09-2003, 12:17 AM
Originally posted by clocker@9 December 2003 - 00:14
No, not really.
It is warmer up there.
MagicNakor really appreciates the benefits of a roaring fire and keeps the hearth up there well stocked and tended.
Occasionally one may drift into a deeper state of contemplation, easily mistaken by the young for sleep.
This is sometimes accompanied by drooling.
Not to worry.

As for my sig.
Apparently, several board members came to the conclusion that my sig contained secret messages and complained to the mods. After vociferously ( there&#39;s a word for another thread, hobbes) defending my 12th Amendment right to display nonsensical, or potentially libelous, sigs, my beloved sig was unilaterally wiped clean.
I am over it, and being the bigger man that I am, forgive the misguided souls at the root of the dispute.
Clocker is it really safe to leave the lounge without a chaperon?

TheDave
12-09-2003, 12:18 AM
i dont even understand if theres bitching going on here :o :unsure:

clocker
12-09-2003, 12:20 AM
Originally posted by bigboab@8 December 2003 - 17:17

Clocker is it really safe to leave the lounge without a chaperon?
Yea, the denizens which inhabit the world beyond the Lounge are varied and fearsome, grasshopper, but a stout heart and a trail of breadcrumbs will see you back safely.

Oh, the stories I could tell....

bigboab
12-09-2003, 12:23 AM
Originally posted by clocker+9 December 2003 - 00:20--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 9 December 2003 - 00:20)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigboab@8 December 2003 - 17:17

Clocker is it really safe to leave the lounge without a chaperon?
Yea, the denizens which inhabit the world beyond the Lounge are varied and fearsome, grasshopper, but a stout heart and a trail of breadcrumbs will see you back safely.

Oh, the stories I could tell.... [/b][/quote]
Thanks Clocker. But as I have had no apple tonight I better leave it to the weekend. Breadcrumbs? :lol:

lynx
12-09-2003, 12:27 AM
Originally posted by TheDave@8 December 2003 - 23:18
i dont even understand if theres bitching going on here :o :unsure:
You need to remember that clocker and bigboad both have the CRAFT. :lol:

clocker
12-09-2003, 12:31 AM
The occasional "x" marked with flourescent spray paint is actually far more effective, but the "tree-huggers ( you know who you are&#33;) seem to find this offensive.
Hence, breadcrumbs.

This is okay, unless Billy Dean is hungry.
Then all bets are off.

clocker
12-09-2003, 12:33 AM
Originally posted by lynx@8 December 2003 - 17:27

You need to remember that clocker and bigboad both have the CRAFT. :lol:
Forsooth and verily.

Yea.

bigboab
12-09-2003, 12:33 AM
Originally posted by clocker@9 December 2003 - 00:31
The occasional "x" marked with flourescent spray paint is actually far more effective, but the "tree-huggers ( you know who you are&#33;) seem to find this offensive.
Hence, breadcrumbs.

This is okay, unless Billy Dean is hungry.
Then all bets are off.
No its his birthday. He wont be hungry today. :lol:

Infested Cats
12-09-2003, 12:36 AM
Originally posted by MediaSlayer@8 December 2003 - 02:59
http://atthebegining.hypermart.net/images/loadingme.gif
:D hehehe

clocker
12-09-2003, 12:39 AM
His appetite is voracious and insatiable.

A mere birthday (Belated Happy Birthday, Billy&#33;) certainly wouldn&#39;t daunt him.

He is particularly fond of Triscuits and Ritz crackercrumbs.
But, any port in a storm and it is always blustery around Cape Billy...

J'Pol
12-09-2003, 12:42 AM
Originally posted by bigboab+9 December 2003 - 01:23--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigboab @ 9 December 2003 - 01:23)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by clocker@9 December 2003 - 00:20
<!--QuoteBegin-bigboab@8 December 2003 - 17:17

Clocker is it really safe to leave the lounge without a chaperon?
Yea, the denizens which inhabit the world beyond the Lounge are varied and fearsome, grasshopper, but a stout heart and a trail of breadcrumbs will see you back safely.

Oh, the stories I could tell....
Thanks Clocker. But as I have had no apple tonight I better leave it to the weekend. Breadcrumbs? :lol: [/b][/quote]
I have always found that the Apple provides me with a stout enough heart to proceed.

However twine in preference to the breadcrumbs for escape from a labyrinthine puzzle. They have failed both Hansel and Gretel, so I have no trust in them. I find the Minotaur too deadly a foe to rely on breadcrumbs alone.

I remain as ever your humble and obedient servant

Theseus.

J'Pol
12-09-2003, 12:43 AM
Originally posted by clocker@9 December 2003 - 01:39
His appetite is voracious and insatiable.

A mere birthday (Belated Happy Birthday, Billy&#33;) certainly wouldn&#39;t daunt him.

He is particularly fond of Triscuits and Ritz crackercrumbs.
But, any port in a storm and it is always blustery around Cape Billy...
Aw Blaw, we call that.

clocker
12-09-2003, 12:52 AM
Theseus, eh?

You really are more elderly than I.

J'Pol
12-09-2003, 01:04 AM
Originally posted by clocker@9 December 2003 - 01:52
Theseus, eh?

You really are more elderly than I.
Indeed Diogenes, how goes the search you old cynic.

clocker
12-09-2003, 01:06 AM
No honest men as yet, sadly.

Many crackercrumb trail despoilers, though.