PDA

View Full Version : I'm Lagging In Far Cry



abu_has_the_power
03-26-2004, 05:52 PM
i'm lagging! i have everything on high, and i have aa and af on highest, and i'm lagging!!!?!?!? :cry1: i switch down to no aa and no af, and still a little bit jumpy here and there. but fraps says i get 70fps with no aa/af. sigh. i'd think i could handle a game like this with a system like mine. :frusty: :frusty: :ph34r:

RGX
03-26-2004, 05:56 PM
Ive told you before IT IS DESIGNED TO RUN AT MAXIMUM SETTINGS ON NEXT GENERATION HARDWARE.

= 64 Bit Chips - R420/NV40

abu_has_the_power
03-26-2004, 07:03 PM
Originally posted by RGX@26 March 2004 - 12:56
Ive told you before IT IS DESIGNED TO RUN AT MAXIMUM SETTINGS ON NEXT GENERATION HARDWARE.

= 64 Bit Chips - R420/NV40
when did u do that?

RGX
03-26-2004, 09:30 PM
I forgot which post, was only a couple of days ago max, in gameworld.

Keikan
03-28-2004, 11:50 AM
*sigh* games minimum system requirements already hit 1ghz 1 year later what are they gonna be? 2ghz?

unreal_dude
03-28-2004, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by Keikan@28 March 2004 - 17:20
*sigh* games minimum system requirements already hit 1ghz 1 year later what are they gonna be? 2ghz?
i agree .this has 2 stop man !

Nxt time u go out to buy a new gfx card or hardware .........u learn that it has already grown outdated by the time u finish shopping for ur hardware !!

:lol: :lol: :lol:

james_bond_rulez
03-28-2004, 04:39 PM
u guys get real. this is the real life behind computing. Stuff upgrades so you have to keep up. Instead of crying on some forum.... <_<

All of my computer hardwares are kept up to date. I upgrade all the hardware at least every 6 months to the latest industry standard.

Minimum requirements are for posers....

Mad Cat
03-28-2004, 04:52 PM
Erm, works fine for me full AA & AF max setting 1280x1024.

The only real difference in processors, me FX51 and 9800XT. The XT is like an o/c&#39;ed PRO really.

fatality
03-28-2004, 05:20 PM
Originally posted by james_bond_rulez@28 March 2004 - 16:39
u guys get real. this is the real life behind computing. Stuff upgrades so you have to keep up. Instead of crying on some forum.... <_<

All of my computer hardwares are kept up to date. I upgrade all the hardware at least every 6 months to the latest industry standard.

Minimum requirements are for posers....
i&#39;ll do that wen i win a million bucks in a lottery or somthin...


anyways the demo lagged for me which put me off the whole ""far cry""

abu_has_the_power
03-28-2004, 05:41 PM
well, rite now i&#39;m doing 120fps with everything on high (not very high). same details can&#39;t notice any differences. now it&#39;s shorter load time :01: and 120fps. not jerky anymore. if i add aa and af to this now, i wonder how it would do... hmmm....

4th gen
03-28-2004, 05:43 PM
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@28 March 2004 - 16:41
well, rite now i&#39;m doing 120fps with everything on high (not very high). same details can&#39;t notice any differences. now it&#39;s shorter load time :01: and 120fps. not jerky anymore. if i add aa and af to this now, i wonder how it would do... hmmm....
What&#39;s your monitor refresh rate?

abu_has_the_power
03-28-2004, 06:00 PM
Originally posted by 4th gen+28 March 2004 - 12:43--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (4th gen @ 28 March 2004 - 12:43)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@28 March 2004 - 16:41
well, rite&nbsp; now i&#39;m doing 120fps with everything on high (not very high). same details can&#39;t notice any differences. now it&#39;s shorter load time&nbsp; :01:&nbsp; and 120fps. not jerky anymore. if i add aa and af to this now, i wonder how it would do... hmmm....
What&#39;s your monitor refresh rate? [/b][/quote]
70

4th gen
03-28-2004, 06:06 PM
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power+28 March 2004 - 17:00--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (abu_has_the_power @ 28 March 2004 - 17:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by 4th gen@28 March 2004 - 12:43
<!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@28 March 2004 - 16:41
well, rite&nbsp; now i&#39;m doing 120fps with everything on high (not very high). same details can&#39;t notice any differences. now it&#39;s shorter load time&nbsp; :01:&nbsp; and 120fps. not jerky anymore. if i add aa and af to this now, i wonder how it would do... hmmm....
What&#39;s your monitor refresh rate?
70 [/b][/quote]
You&#39;re only displaying at 70 then, but rendering at 120...the extra 50fps is worthless?

cpt_azad
03-28-2004, 08:02 PM
120 fps&#33;&#33;&#33;

i&#39;m stuck with 40 fps "average" on everything set to low-medium (except shadows and lighting, they&#39;re set at high) 1280x1024. i tried turning on aa and af (aa 8x and af max) and the fps dropped to like 13 fps average. 120&#33;&#33; damn, i wish i had a comp like that, but due to lack of money and time, i guess i can&#39;t keep up with this tech world to fast :( :angry:

oh, and my craptacular system:

1.2 ghz AMD <_<
384 mb RAM :angry:
some stupid really old mobo :blink:
120x2 gb hdd :)
geforece xfx 5200 128 mb <_< :angry: (this vid card just sucks ass, but i needed a directx 9 compatible one for a really cheap price)

abu_has_the_power
03-28-2004, 11:03 PM
Originally posted by 4th gen+28 March 2004 - 13:06--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (4th gen @ 28 March 2004 - 13:06)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@28 March 2004 - 17:00

Originally posted by 4th gen@28 March 2004 - 12:43
<!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@28 March 2004 - 16:41
well, rite now i&#39;m doing 120fps with everything on high (not very high). same details can&#39;t notice any differences. now it&#39;s shorter load time :01: and 120fps. not jerky anymore. if i add aa and af to this now, i wonder how it would do... hmmm....
What&#39;s your monitor refresh rate?
70
You&#39;re only displaying at 70 then, but rendering at 120...the extra 50fps is worthless? [/b][/quote]
huh? what do u mean worthless?


and at cpt_azad, i only paid bout %700-&#036;750 for this whole thing, plus a shit load of shipping and handling. so maybe &#036;800 max. not bad eh?

4th gen
03-28-2004, 11:14 PM
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@28 March 2004 - 22:03
huh? what do u mean worthless?
I&#39;m just saying that you shouldn&#39;t see a difference between the game running at 70-80 fps and the game running at 120fps. What you should try and do is to get the system at the highest quality which gives an average of 80 or so fps...

cpt_azad
03-29-2004, 12:25 AM
and at cpt_azad, i only paid bout %700-&#036;750 for this whole thing, plus a shit load of shipping and handling. so maybe &#036;800 max. not bad eh?

:o , tell me where you got it from&#33;&#33;&#33; or atleast where u got the parts from&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; NOW&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; must.......find........out........abu&#39;s........home........address.......... :angry: :D

seriously, pm me

james_bond_rulez
03-29-2004, 01:06 AM
abu *cough* stole *cough* all the stuff :lol:

abu_has_the_power
03-29-2004, 01:58 AM
Originally posted by james_bond_rulez@28 March 2004 - 20:06
abu *cough* stole *cough* all the stuff :lol:
lol. it&#39;s a long story. started with ibuypower. i changed every single part in the computer except for the cpu, the floppy drive, and the case. everything else was either changed or addeded. i just look around for good bargains. black friday was a good one. so were the sales that newegg had