PDA

View Full Version : Stop Copying Pictures Over & Over.



zapjb
04-16-2004, 06:11 AM
This is what I mean. http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showt...=0&#entry976969 (http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=109167&st=0&#entry976969)

There is no reason to copy the pictures that are already in the thread. And to boot multiple times. Have some thought to us on 56k. :angry:

Adster
04-16-2004, 06:21 AM
I was on 56k not so long ago for a very long time and I will say I know how you feel but their is no rule against it

muchspl2
04-16-2004, 06:23 AM
http://members.cox.net/xcuse/owned.gif

Samurai
04-16-2004, 06:24 AM
That's why there is a 'Image Resize' setting in place.

Try placing your hand in your pockets and paying a little extra for broadband. It can&#39;t be that more expensive where you live <_<

Samurai
04-16-2004, 06:25 AM
Originally posted by muchspl2@16 April 2004 - 05:23
http://members.cox.net/xcuse/owned.gif
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

muchspl2
04-16-2004, 06:26 AM
I wish it was a bigger gif :lol:

Samurai
04-16-2004, 06:32 AM
http://www.shsu.edu/%7Echm_tgc/sounds/pushmovies/titrate.gif

Samurai
04-16-2004, 06:33 AM
http://www.shsu.edu/%7Echemistry/spectrometer/spect.gif

zapjb
04-16-2004, 06:48 AM
Selfish bastards&#33;

Rip The Jacker
04-16-2004, 06:51 AM
Originally posted by Samurai@15 April 2004 - 22:24
That&#39;s why there is a &#39;Image Resize&#39; setting in place.

Try placing your hand in your pockets and paying a little extra for broadband. It can&#39;t be that more expensive where you live <_<
The Image Resize makes the image appear smaller in the thread, but the filesize is still the same.

Also, that last sentence wasn&#39;t appreciated. I&#39;m on 56k, and some people can&#39;t afford broadband, is that a problem?

muchspl2
04-16-2004, 06:54 AM
whats ther point of image resize then
never did like that

justin_9733
04-16-2004, 06:59 AM
Originally posted by muchspl2@15 April 2004 - 22:54
whats ther point of image resize then
never did like that
same here

j4y3m
04-16-2004, 07:04 AM
I don&#39;t really understand what you are talking about. Do you mean when a member quotes a picture? Because I thought it would just load it again from your cache no?

4th gen
04-16-2004, 07:06 AM
Originally posted by Samurai@16 April 2004 - 05:32
http://www.shsu.edu/%7Echm_tgc/sounds/pushmovies/titrate.gif
I hate titrations :angry:

They were my hell for a bloody year

RealitY
04-16-2004, 07:07 AM
That question only opens the 7th can of worms again...

Adster
04-16-2004, 07:31 AM
Originally posted by Samurai@16 April 2004 - 16:24
That&#39;s why there is a &#39;Image Resize&#39; setting in place.

Try placing your hand in your pockets and paying a little extra for broadband. It can&#39;t be that more expensive where you live <_<
umm no offense not everybody CAN just get dsl

for instance living in Australia only 25% of peopel can get it here for insane prices ;)

and 64% of teh US still are on dial up 74% in the UK

statistics say

we don&#39;t all live in America where we can just ring up hey give me a #mb connection for &#036;30 and have it turned on tomorrow

I&#39;m paying &#036;60 with a 16 gig cap a month just for 256/64 so life isn&#39;t just that easy in every place you live

Mad Cat
04-16-2004, 08:59 AM
Once your browser has downloaded the picture, even if they are quoted 5000 times it won&#39;t take any longer to load. They go into your temporary internet files for later viewing. If they don&#39;t its you thats made that configuration.

Cyril
04-16-2004, 02:06 PM
Or, the easy solution would be to go in to your board settings and say NO to viewing images etc.

Adster
04-16-2004, 02:28 PM
Originally posted by Cyril@17 April 2004 - 00:06
Or, the easy solution would be to go in to your board settings and say NO to viewing images etc.
actully no that wouldn&#39;t be an easy solution i&#39;m sure he wants to view some pics on this board

uNz[i]
04-16-2004, 02:30 PM
Originally posted by Mad Cat@16 April 2004 - 18:29
Once your browser has downloaded the picture, even if they are quoted 5000 times it won&#39;t take any longer to load. They go into your temporary internet files for later viewing. If they don&#39;t its you thats made that configuration.
Question: Would you want to hang around for 10 minutes waiting for those pics to download for the first time?

@ Cyril: - Disabling images means 56K users will miss out on a sizeable chunk of forum content.
Program and game screenshots for previews and troubleshooting, album covers, funny pics in the Lounge... all gone.
That&#39;s hardly fair, is it?

muchspl2
04-16-2004, 02:30 PM
no
he can&#39;t have both
either stop bitching or turn off pic&#39;s
simple

Adster
04-16-2004, 02:58 PM
Originally posted by uNz[i]+17 April 2004 - 00:30--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (uNz[i] @ 17 April 2004 - 00:30)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mad Cat@16 April 2004 - 18:29
Once your browser has downloaded the picture, even if they are quoted 5000 times it won&#39;t take any longer to load. They go into your temporary internet files for later viewing. If they don&#39;t its you thats made that configuration.
Question: Would you want to hang around for 10 minutes waiting for those pics to download for the first time?

@ Cyril: - Disabling images means 56K users will miss out on a sizeable chunk of forum content.
Program and game screenshots for previews and troubleshooting, album covers, funny pics in the Lounge... all gone.
That&#39;s hardly fair, is it? [/b][/quote]
exactly

all right for you high speeders to be saying this now but remember you haev been a 56ker before...

Barbarossa
04-16-2004, 03:02 PM
Originally posted by Adster@16 April 2004 - 14:58

all right for you high speeders to be saying this now but remember you haev been a 56ker before...
Yes, and before that we didn&#39;t have a connection at all, and before that we only had green screens, and before that they used punched card and tickertape..

what&#39;s your point? :blink:

Cyril
04-16-2004, 03:03 PM
Just a suggestion - chill out.
I was on 56k not that long ago. had pictures off, and when there were screen shots and stuff I wanted to see then would enable it.

ashutosh_cool16
04-16-2004, 08:37 PM
Originally posted by muchspl2@16 April 2004 - 14:30
no
he can&#39;t have both
either stop bitching or turn off pic&#39;s
simple
exactly.... I was a 56 K user earlier.. but i didnt surf much minding the telephone bills.... but since last 3 years.. i m a cablenet user... so i Surf a lot n have complete freedom...

So acc to me, 56 K &#39;ers should only check emails and stuff... so that u don&#39;t waste ur money downloadin pios n movies.

blitz
04-16-2004, 09:10 PM
It sucks being a 56ker, but when you are a 56ker, you learn to have patience......

callum
04-16-2004, 09:23 PM
Originally posted by blitz81388@16 April 2004 - 21:10
It sucks being a 56ker, but when you are a 56ker, you learn to have patience......
I don&#39;t agree, some people post large pictures, for no other reason than, they are too lazy to resize them. Why should people on dial-up suffer because of them?

NightStalker
04-16-2004, 09:40 PM
Originally posted by callum+16 April 2004 - 16:23--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (callum @ 16 April 2004 - 16:23)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-blitz81388@16 April 2004 - 21:10
It sucks being a 56ker, but when you are a 56ker, you learn to have patience......
I don&#39;t agree, some people post large pictures, for no other reason than, they are too lazy to resize them. Why should people on dial-up suffer because of them? [/b][/quote]
That equation can also work the other way around too, such as, Why should people on high speed internet suffer because of 56k users? ;)

zapjb
04-16-2004, 09:41 PM
You are too reasonable callum. I ascribe worse motives. ;)

thewizeard
04-16-2004, 09:42 PM
Maybe we should have a forum especially for 56k&#39;ers...? :)

J'Pol
04-16-2004, 09:46 PM
Originally posted by nigel123@16 April 2004 - 22:42
Maybe we should have a forum especially for 56k&#39;ers...? :)
The slow lane.

bulio
04-16-2004, 09:50 PM
:blink:

h1
04-16-2004, 10:36 PM
Browser cache.

I probably have this entire forum from 9/02 archived in my cache. :D

Adster
04-17-2004, 02:53 AM
Originally posted by NightStalker+17 April 2004 - 07:40--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (NightStalker &#064; 17 April 2004 - 07:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by callum@16 April 2004 - 16:23
<!--QuoteBegin-blitz81388@16 April 2004 - 21:10
It sucks being a 56ker, but when you are a 56ker, you learn to have patience......
I don&#39;t agree, some people post large pictures, for no other reason than, they are too lazy to resize them. Why should people on dial-up suffer because of them?
That equation can also work the other way around too, such as, Why should people on high speed internet suffer because of 56k users? ;) [/b][/quote]
no that is the high speders fault for NOT having patience

and ditto to the 56kers

wehni was on 56k and was the user on here caled adthomp <_<

I Managed to post 3000 posts in about 3 months whist downloading movies music ect at the same time

so don&#39;t tell me 56ks are at a disatvanatage You need god dam patience&#33;&#33;&#33;

digmen1
04-17-2004, 03:17 AM
We here in New Zealand are being ripped off by Telecom who charge a lot more for broadband and put a low cap on it as well, so the broadband takeup in NZ is very low - only about 10%.

I too find it a bit frustrating to wait for pages to load when you are in a hurry to post a reply, it sometimes puts you off reading threads.

Could not they make it an otpion to view the pics ?

Regards

Digby

GHOST 1337
04-17-2004, 03:21 AM
Originally posted by digmen1@17 April 2004 - 03:17
Could not they make it an otpion to view the pics ?


download mozilla firefox 0.8, then get some extensions such as &#39;adblock&#39;. you can basically delete any image on a page from ever showing up ever again.

Adster
04-17-2004, 03:49 AM
Originally posted by digmen1@17 April 2004 - 13:17
We here in New Zealand are being ripped off by Telecom who charge a lot more for broadband and put a low cap on it as well, so the broadband takeup in NZ is very low - only about 10%.

I too find it a bit frustrating to wait for pages to load when you are in a hurry to post a reply, it sometimes puts you off reading threads.

Could not they make it an otpion to view the pics ?

Regards

Digby
yes all you peopel taht say Australia is a rip off and where a pathetic county for technology adn are ripped off new zealand is about 2 times worse&#33;&#33;&#33;

muchspl2
04-17-2004, 08:55 AM
Originally posted by digmen1@16 April 2004 - 22:17
We here in New Zealand are being ripped off by Telecom who charge a lot more for broadband and put a low cap on it as well, so the broadband takeup in NZ is very low - only about 10%.

I too find it a bit frustrating to wait for pages to load when you are in a hurry to post a reply, it sometimes puts you off reading threads.

Could not they make it an otpion to view the pics ?

Regards

Digby
you don&#39;t need any different browser, you just need to turn off pics
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=UserCP&CODE=04

Marius24
04-17-2004, 10:54 AM
Originally posted by zapjb@16 April 2004 - 06:11
This is what I mean. http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showt...=0&#entry976969 (http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=109167&st=0&#entry976969)

There is no reason to copy the pictures that are already in the thread. And to boot multiple times. Have some thought to us on 56k. :angry:
There&#39;s nothing wrong with quoting an image, I thought that once you had the image in your cache you didn&#39;t download it again if you saw it again so it wouldn&#39;t make a difference if it was quoted or not so there is no arguement... :lol:



I could be wrong tho :P