View Full Version : 0-200mph-0
4th gen
05-04-2004, 03:51 AM
How long do you reckon it takes a RUF CTR Yellowbird to go from a standstill to 200 miles per hour, and then stop?
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid108/pb07956d8e2aa2bc274c37d13cb4bec80/f9439277.jpg
Price: £56,000 (60k miles)
Engine: Flat-six, 3349cc, 462bhp @ 5000rpm, 479lb ft @ 3500rpm
Gearbox: 6-speed manual
Brakes: 330mm ventilated discs
ABS: No
Weight: 1100kg
Power to Weight ratio: 420bhp/tonne
For those of you who've read this month's Autocar, no cheating ;)
Samurai
05-04-2004, 04:49 AM
3.2 seconds?
DirtyDan
05-04-2004, 05:06 AM
33.2 seconds :blink: ?
333.2 seconds?
No, that can't be right... :huh:
Ruf! Ruf! :D
4th gen
05-04-2004, 05:27 AM
Originally posted by DirtyDan@4 May 2004 - 04:06
33.2 seconds :blink: ?
This is closest so far, but still a way out.
I can't really say too much for fear of giving away the answer, but here's a couple of things that might help...
The terminal speed at the standing mile is 189mph
It takes 450 metres to stop from 200mph
Samurai
05-04-2004, 05:30 AM
Crap!!! I thought I read 0-60 LOL :lol:
4th gen
05-04-2004, 05:31 AM
Originally posted by Samurai@4 May 2004 - 04:30
Crap!!! I thought I read 0-60 LOL :lol:
:lol:
As a slight aside, the 0-60 figure is 3.65 seconds
Samurai
05-04-2004, 05:41 AM
16.3 seconds?
4th gen
05-04-2004, 05:46 AM
You're overestimating its abilities
Samurai
05-04-2004, 05:48 AM
Originally posted by 4th gen@4 May 2004 - 04:46
You're overestimating its abilities
Doesn't sound like a car that is magical <_< USS Enterprise could do it <_<
Samurai
05-04-2004, 05:56 AM
62.7 seconds :blink: :frusty:
4th gen
05-04-2004, 05:58 AM
Originally posted by j2k4@4 May 2004 - 04:55
52 seconds.
Closest yet
Originally posted by 4th gen+3 May 2004 - 23:58--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (4th gen @ 3 May 2004 - 23:58)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@4 May 2004 - 04:55
52 seconds.
Closest yet [/b][/quote]
Of course.
What in hell are you still doing awake?
54.7 seconds
Samurai
05-04-2004, 06:01 AM
47.6 seconds :frusty: :frusty:
4th gen
05-04-2004, 06:04 AM
Originally posted by j2k4+4 May 2004 - 05:00--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (j2k4 @ 4 May 2004 - 05:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by 4th gen@3 May 2004 - 23:58
<!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@4 May 2004 - 04:55
52 seconds.
Closest yet
Of course.
What in hell are you still doing awake?
54.7 seconds [/b][/quote]
I've been up since about 11pm last night (7 hours or so) cos I had to write an essay :(
I think Samurai has won, he's within 4 tenths of a second
4th gen
05-04-2004, 06:05 AM
The actual time is 47.20 seconds. The 0-200 time is ~ 35.5 seconds, the 200-0 time is 11.19 seconds.
What can I say, I was impressed :)
edit: here's a couple of clips of the car in action:
Video 1 (http://www.arap78.dsl.pipex.com/RUF1.wmv)
Video 2 (http://www.arap78.dsl.pipex.com/RUF2.wmv)
If you've never seen these videos before (Stefan Roser driving the Yellowbird at the Nordschleife), then you're in for a treat :o
Samurai
05-04-2004, 06:07 AM
47.2 or 48 seconds spot on. Thank you. I would like to thank my friends, family *sob* my brother, my... I'm sorry I can't go on. i love you all.
Originally posted by Samurai@4 May 2004 - 00:07
47.2 or 48 seconds spot on. Thank you. I would like to thank my friends, family *sob* my brother, my... I'm sorry I can't go on. i love you all.
You looked, you cheater! :angry:
(>Zero Cool<)
05-04-2004, 03:12 PM
I disagree with your figures :huh:
add a brick wall into the calculation and you get a total of about 35.6 seconds :01: :frusty:
JONNO_CELEBS
05-04-2004, 03:15 PM
Not that fast then, a Honda CBR900RR Fireblade can do 0-140mph in 10.6 seconds :D
My bike can stand toe to toe with it over a qauter mile :D
Jonno B)
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@4 May 2004 - 09:23
Not that fast then, a Honda CBR900RR Fireblade can do 0-140mph in 10.6 seconds :D
My bike can stand toe to toe with it over a qauter mile :D
Jonno B)
Bikes have toes :huh: ?
JONNO_CELEBS
05-04-2004, 03:51 PM
Yeah course they do :)
Jonno B)
Barbarossa
05-04-2004, 05:00 PM
Why would you want to go from a standstill to 200 miles per hour, and then stop?
:blink:
bujub22
05-04-2004, 05:05 PM
Image Resized
http://www.tremcopoliceproducts.com/crash.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'> ('http://www.tremcopoliceproducts.com/crash.jpg')
don't matter piece of shit don't stop on a dime anyway![img]http://www.tremcopoliceproducts.com/lapd_car.gif
Originally posted by barbarossa@4 May 2004 - 11:08
Why would you want to go from a standstill to 200 miles per hour, and then stop?
:blink:
I guess 'cuz someone already did it, and someone else wants to do it better/faster. :)
It is kind of pointless, in and of itself, but it is a recognized measuring stick. ;)
BigDaddy555
05-04-2004, 08:16 PM
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@4 May 2004 - 09:23
Not that fast then, a Honda CBR900RR Fireblade can do 0-140mph in 10.6 seconds :D
My bike can stand toe to toe with it over a qauter mile :D
Jonno B)
GET A GIXXER!!!!!!
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@4 May 2004 - 15:23
Not that fast then, a Honda CBR900RR Fireblade can do 0-140mph in 10.6 seconds :D
My bike can stand toe to toe with it over a qauter mile :D
Jonno B)
Yeah....it doesnt have a roof though....and only two wheels.....and if you crash it you ARE the airbag.
amphoteric88
05-05-2004, 05:41 PM
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@4 May 2004 - 16:23
Not that fast then, a Honda CBR900RR Fireblade can do 0-140mph in 10.6 seconds :D
My bike can stand toe to toe with it over a qauter mile :D
Jonno B)
Suzuki GSX-R 1000
0-30mph: 1.12 seconds
0-60mph: 2.64 seconds
0-100mph: 5.03 seconds
100mph-0: 5.63 seconds
0-100mph-0 run (including 0.23 second reaction time): 10.89 seconds
Caterham R500 Evolution
0-30mph: 1.45 seconds
0-60mph: 3.21 seconds
0-100mph: 6.92 seconds
100mph-0: 3.60 seconds
0-100mph-0 run (including 0.21 second reaction time): 10.73 seconds
Bikes are fast at accelerating, Jonno, I'll give you that, but they're a little lacking at braking and going round corners ;)
BigBoo
05-05-2004, 06:47 PM
bikes are cooler to ride. double white lines mean nothingg to us :lol:
amphoteric88
05-05-2004, 06:51 PM
Originally posted by BigBoo@5 May 2004 - 19:55
bikes are cooler to ride. double white lines mean nothingg to us :lol:
Right up until you guys crash :rolleyes:
BigBoo
05-05-2004, 06:53 PM
but we donmt have to wait for the jaws of life
Chevy
05-05-2004, 08:28 PM
1234
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.