My Av And Sig

[j4y3m]

Is it me or do they really stand out when reading through topics? :unsure:

[ck-uk]

you have a nice colour combo with the stars,m8,makes you,tidy

[j4y3m]

I don't like the sig, might change it. :unsure:

[sparsely]

I guess you must have changed them since you started this thread....
they just look plain & normal to me.
:huh:

[j4y3m]

I've changed the sig now, the other was really crap, thos one's okay.

[manker]

Originally posted by j4y3m@9 July 2004 - 08:25
Is it me or do they really stand out when reading through topics? :unsure:
It's just you. they look pretty drab, I prefer ck-uk's :D

[ck-uk]

could do ,chang'd my av...

[j4y3m]

I'm going for a no sig look. :P

@manker: What does drab mean? :P

[manker]

Originally posted by j4y3m@9 July 2004 - 09:24
I'm going for a no sig look. :P

@manker: What does drab mean? :P
I'm just joking, your sig looked OK really, not drab (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=define%3A+drab&btnG=Search) at all ;)

Sparsely is the king of sigs anyway, it's really clever how he's photoshopped Peter Andre's Calvin's. :01:

[sparsely]

:o
King! :wub:
While I am most certainly flattered and gratified by your kind words, there are two points that I feel I must clarify.

1. It's not been photoshopped. I use FireworksMX for everything.
2. It is vector art. Not a digially manipulated image. I created it all myself :)
(with the exception of the original angelboy, whose origins are completely unknown to me)

but w000!
sparsely runs off to polish his crown :D

[manker]

Originally posted by Sparsely@9 July 2004 - 09:43
:o
King! :wub:
While I am most certainly flattered and gratified by your kind words, there are two points that I feel I must clarify.

1. It's not been photoshopped. I use FireworksMX for everything.
2. It is vector art. Not a digially manipulated image. I created it all myself :)
(with the exception of the original angelboy, whose origins are completely unknown to me)

but w000!
sparsely runs off to polish his crown :D

Oh dear. I feel a flippant comment designed to connect a sig with a title with a liking for a weightlifting singer's undergarments has been misinterpreted. probably because of my ignorance to all things graphically designed :">

But then, it is a really cool sig, I wouldn't be able to tell you what anyone else's was all about without checking. Sparsely, O' King of the Sig, would it be too much trouble to make me a similar one with 'seven of nine' accross the waistband and her tiny likeness instead of the angelboy?