It appears to have become the norm that if a thread starter requests the thread be closed it is done.
Is that board policy here, irrespective of whether other people are carrying on a discussion.
Printable View
It appears to have become the norm that if a thread starter requests the thread be closed it is done.
Is that board policy here, irrespective of whether other people are carrying on a discussion.
Its nothing new tho JP , I could see if a problem was solved in software and the thread starter asked it to be closed . Its up to the mods tho not the poster I would think . I'v asked for threads to be closed that fell on deaf ears and probably for the better . Do you have a link, my Zorro senses are tingling . :lol:
It's something I'm not entirely clear on. I can understand how, if a thread gets out of hand then someone (anyone) may ask for it to be locked. Mods will then decide if closure is appropriate.
It appears however to be the current feeling that if the thread starter asks for it to be closed then it's a given it will be, no matter that people may be continuing the discussion. My view is more that once you start it everyone owns it. The starter has no more claim over it than anyone else.
The one that made me ask is in The Drawing Room, however it's a more general question than that. I just wondered if there was a policy.
I think I know what you mean JP , as I'v seen myself and wondered why I could n't add to the discussion better or worse . If the board allows a thread two years old to be resurrected why close a thread .
Some are funny and if no personal attacks why not just leave open warts and all .
It just seems to me that people can be having a discussion and someone else can say, "Right, that's enough, stop now". Which just seems wrong.
I'd rather that mods considered it and decided whether a rule or rules were broken. To me that's the only proper reason for finishing a discussion.
Or they may decide that it was a good going thread, but that someone got out of hand, then give them a wee warning (or big one if appropriate).
Closing threads is much better than deleting them. However it still isn't ideal when there haven't really been any infractions.
I see what you mean JP , I did n't read it all but seems like the O.P. got his ass kicked in a game of wits and wimped out ?
I'm surprised a mod has not posted his or her opinion on closing threads . I'm home today so have too much time on my hands . :ph34r:
Has a mod every reopened a closed thread ? I'd pm the mod and ask .
It's not really that one specifically, that just got me to thinking.
Barbie seemed reticent about closing it. However if there's a policy on that then he had no choice.
Just thought I would bring the subject up as a discussion point. As it's about the board this seemed the best place.
The way I handle it is that I ask for a reason for it being closed, same for the original thread starter and for anyone else.
I only close if there's a proper reason.
A thread going off from the discussion the poster intended will sometimes be closed, depends on t he situation and how far off it got.
There's been many times when I've said No about closing a thread to the thread starter.
I'm pretty sure most other mods here handle it the same way...
Cheers, Ross.
That makes sence to me.
Please feel free to close this thread, now that has been cleared up. It can serve no further useful purpose.
So JP , its ok to close now ? Just kidding tho make Ross ,think a bit ?:naughty:
No, seriously, I meant it.
The question is answered. It's up to Mod's discretion. I'm sure if they are in doubt they will confer with other Team members.
I see no further useful purpose for the thread, anything else would just be spam.
Move to the lounge ? I'm teasing and surprised that other members had no say . Oh well sera la lemas, please check spelling .:yup:
Ross is Admin, what does it matter what other people think.
That's like saying "The Judge has spoken, let's hear what the Police think".
To put none to fine a point on it, what does it actually matter.
The Boss has already spoken. Everything else is, meh.
Here's an example of a thread gone wrong. It's in the News Section and I felt that locking it was a bit much so I just threatened to delete any off-topic posts, given a fair warning of course. :smilie4:
I see nothing wrong there. People are just pointing out that they'd never use Internet Exploder and prefer Firefox. Only a Microsoft fanboi would take offence tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairbautt
It's mostly the n00b users (who occasionally flood the News Section for post count) that only post "I prefer Firefox" with no mention towards IE - gotta be careful and watch their posts...besides the main topic at hand is the future of IE and not the user's preference, however, comparing IE and FF is obviously no problem. I tried to word it very carefully...Quote:
Originally Posted by CheeseI see nothing wrong there. People are just pointing out that they'd never use Internet Exploder and prefer Firefox. Only a Microsoft fanboi would take offence tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairbautt
And I am a M$ fan as well as a Google fan. :happy: So far no posts have been deleted for that reason, but if someone notices that their post was deleted they can ask a higher power (Admin n'such).
:unsure:sarcastic?Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
You were spot-on about the future posts being spam thing. :P
Sarcastic - No.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossco:unsure:sarcastic?Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
You were spot-on about the future posts being spam thing. :P
Spam - Yes.
Who could have predicted that.
I agree.
As I had run out of sensible meaningful words. The last one I used up in the lounge, and then it got moved to the Drawing Room.
Edit: changing that comma into a full stop seems to have changed the context too..I might have to change it back later ( the one after agree).
Well that and the fact Chewie,was pulling Hairbautt's chain . To Hairbautt's credit he did n't close as he would of looked like a fucking idiot . Now we can't object to a browser as it might offend the original poster ? Boy we gain two steps and fall back three . :dabs:Quote:
Originally Posted by CheeseI see nothing wrong there. People are just pointing out that they'd never use Internet Exploder and prefer Firefox. Only a Microsoft fanboi would take offence tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairbautt
Time to close this one then?
:shuriken:
Overdue