internet.news:
I think his policy is in some ways (a little) extraordinary - as this is said really in a nice way - I don't agree with his environmental policy in particular, when he tried to search for oil in Alaska in Park.
Printable View
internet.news:
I think his policy is in some ways (a little) extraordinary - as this is said really in a nice way - I don't agree with his environmental policy in particular, when he tried to search for oil in Alaska in Park.
The worst pres. in the history of the USA, both internationally and economically at home.
i would make the same statement about any pres. that made the mess he has no matter what party he stood for
He's a hell of a lot better than Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon and his daddy.
At this point in time he looks like a brain surgeon next to Tony Blair (alleged war criminal) all because he signed the treaty recognizing the world court, I wonder if he would sign his own death warrant ??????:D
Yes, obviously Bush promised to keep up economy and it did not work well as we wished for.Quote:
Originally posted by vidcc@21 January 2004 - 20:16
The worst pres. in the history of the USA, both internationally and economically at home.
i would make the same statement about any pres. that made the mess he has no matter what party he stood for
So, which president is the best from all ones in your eyes? Clinton was fine, was not the best but I could live with him being pres.
What is about women voting for president? Hey, come on - we need some change... But, please not from the Bushs ;)
Georgina Bush - hehe...
Yes, obviously Bush promised to keep up economy and it did not work well as we wished for.Quote:
Originally posted by internet.news+21 January 2004 - 14:39--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (internet.news @ 21 January 2004 - 14:39)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-vidcc@21 January 2004 - 20:16
The worst pres. in the history of the USA, both internationally and economically at home.
i would make the same statement about any pres. that made the mess he has no matter what party he stood for
So, which president is the best from all ones in your eyes? Clinton was fine, was not the best but I could live with him being pres.
What is about women voting for president? Hey, come on - we need some change... But, please not from the Bushs ;)
Georgina Bush - hehe... [/b][/quote]
My portfolios doing great witch means GW's economy works for me, 4 more years baby!!!!! ;)
Clinton made a few mistakes but for the general good of the USA he was a spectacular success, he balanced the books and impoved the standard of living for many Americans. He was also a respected statesman on the international field and was good for the enviroment (well he tried at least)
this is an opinion based on the job he did and NOT an endorsement of his policies
My portfolios doing great witch means GW's economy works for me, 4 more years baby!!!!! ;) [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by <TROUBLE^MAKER>+21 January 2004 - 20:43--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (<TROUBLE^MAKER> @ 21 January 2004 - 20:43)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by internet.news@21 January 2004 - 14:39
<!--QuoteBegin-vidcc
Quote:
@21 January 2004 - 20:16
The worst pres. in the history of the USA, both internationally and economically at home.
i would make the same statement about any pres. that made the mess he has no matter what party he stood for
Yes, obviously Bush promised to keep up economy and it did not work well as we wished for.
So, which president is the best from all ones in your eyes? Clinton was fine, was not the best but I could live with him being pres.
What is about women voting for president? Hey, come on - we need some change... But, please not from the Bushs ;)
Georgina Bush - hehe...
That's funny seeing that the stock market has been basically in the shitter since he became President. That being a correlation not necessarily cause and effect.
Now when Clinton was Prez, the market was booming. Companies were doing well and some of it a direct effect of his policies.
All Bush has done is "recently" cut taxes for the rich. This has not (by a long shot)spurred the job growth that he said would happen. So essentially he was wrong.
There alot of folks regretting their vote for Ralph Nader now because it essentially put Bush in office.
As I read US Goverment has a -500.000.000.000 $ in the household since some years. It is much more than germany, as I know we have 40.000.000.000 Euro.
And my city has to pay back 770 Million Euro. (around)
Quote:
Originally posted by Busyman@21 January 2004 - 20:02
[My portfolios doing great witch means GW's economy works for me, 4 more years baby!!!!! ;)
That's funny seeing that the stock market has been basically in the shitter since he became President. That being a correlation not necessarily cause and effect.
[/quote]
he has shares in weapons technology :lol: :lol:
Are you suggesting that it's acceptable to break humans rights issues and commit war crimes if your country didn't sign up?Quote:
Originally posted by <TROUBLE^MAKER>@21 January 2004 - 19:32
He's a hell of a lot better than Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon and his daddy.
At this point in time he looks like a brain surgeon next to Tony Blair (alleged war criminal) all because he signed the treaty recognizing the world court, I wonder if he would sign his own death warrant ??????:D
i don't believe sadam signed up but BUsh wants him to stand trial for war crimes....
i fail to see the relevence of your point
Are you suggesting that it's acceptable to break humans rights issues and commit war crimes if your country didn't sign up?Quote:
Originally posted by vidcc+21 January 2004 - 21:25--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (vidcc @ 21 January 2004 - 21:25)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-<TROUBLE^MAKER>@21 January 2004 - 19:32
He's a hell of a lot better than Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon and his daddy.
At this point in time he looks like a brain surgeon next to Tony Blair (alleged war criminal) all because he signed the treaty recognizing the world court, I wonder if he would sign his own death warrant ??????:D
i don't believe sadam signed up but BUsh wants him to stand trial for war crimes....
i fail to see the relevence of your point [/b][/quote]
You took the word right out of my mouth, well almost anyway
That's funny seeing that the stock market has been basically in the shitter since he became President. That being a correlation not necessarily cause and effect.Quote:
Originally posted by Busyman+21 January 2004 - 15:02--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Busyman @ 21 January 2004 - 15:02)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by <TROUBLE^MAKER>@21 January 2004 - 20:43
Quote:
Originally posted by internet.news@21 January 2004 - 14:39
<!--QuoteBegin-vidcc
Quote:
Quote:
@21 January 2004 - 20:16
The worst pres. in the history of the USA, both internationally and economically at home.
i would make the same statement about any pres. that made the mess he has no matter what party he stood for
Yes, obviously Bush promised to keep up economy and it did not work well as we wished for.
So, which president is the best from all ones in your eyes? Clinton was fine, was not the best but I could live with him being pres.
What is about women voting for president? Hey, come on - we need some change... But, please not from the Bushs ;)
Georgina Bush - hehe...
My portfolios doing great witch means GW's economy works for me, 4 more years baby!!!!! ;)
Now when Clinton was Prez, the market was booming. Companies were doing well and some of it a direct effect of his policies.
All Bush has done is "recently" cut taxes for the rich. This has not (by a long shot)spurred the job growth that he said would happen. So essentially he was wrong.
There alot of folks regretting their vote for Ralph Nader now because it essentially put Bush in office. [/b][/quote]
Buy Low Sell High, 9/11 Made it Low.
Nader didn't put Bush in office. His brother Jeb did by not letting ALL the votes be counted.Quote:
Originally posted by Busyman@21 January 2004 - 20:02
There alot of folks regretting their vote for Ralph Nader now because it essentially put Bush in office.
In terms of international relations, Bush SUCKS. Really badly.
And in terms of the International Criminal Court, Tony Blair did a good thing in signing and trying to create unity and uniformity in a very difficult area. The principals of law say it must apply to everyone, even if it means the person who created it.
I'm sure Bush knows the way he conducts his wars would not be considered acceptable by the rest of the world and didn't fancy being convicted of war crimes. It wasn't a smart move in refusing to sign. It's bloody obvious. "Hey! Sign this so we can lock you up!" Yeah right!
And to trouble^maker - If you're shares are up as a result of Bush's presidency, you are either:
A. Investing in oil and energy stocks
B. Investing only in American stocks
C. Lucky
& (Hopefully)
D. Going to bail out before the election, because shares that do well under Bush would NEVER do well with anyone else in charge.
Nader didn't put Bush in office. His brother Jeb did by not letting ALL the votes be counted.Quote:
Originally posted by Alex H+22 January 2004 - 06:18--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Alex H @ 22 January 2004 - 06:18)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Busyman@21 January 2004 - 20:02
There alot of folks regretting their vote for Ralph Nader now because it essentially put Bush in office.
In terms of international relations, Bush SUCKS. Really badly.
And in terms of the International Criminal Court, Tony Blair did a good thing in signing and trying to create unity and uniformity in a very difficult area. The principals of law say it must apply to everyone, even if it means the person who created it.
I'm sure Bush knows the way he conducts his wars would not be considered acceptable by the rest of the world and didn't fancy being convicted of war crimes. It wasn't a smart move in refusing to sign. It's bloody obvious. "Hey! Sign this so we can lock you up!" Yeah right!
And to trouble^maker - If you're shares are up as a result of Bush's presidency, you are either:
A. Investing in oil and energy stocks
B. Investing only in American stocks
C. Lucky
& (Hopefully)
D. Going to bail out before the election, because shares that do well under Bush would NEVER do well with anyone else in charge. [/b][/quote]
Don't forget
E. Investing in security firms (I sure did)
F. Investing in insurance companies (Buy low sell high 9/11 made them low) :lol:
insurance companies are shit
all they do is make complicated rulez, collect outrageous fees, and bitach at u when u make claims. worst of all they put u on survallience after u make claims.
welcome to the wonderful world of corporate america <_<
http://cmw.dailymoviereviews.com/con...rge/Tomcat.gif
Bombs and missiles aren't cheap and don't grow on trees.
http://mysmilies.creativesell.net/co...owned/tank.gif
Bush Flash - http://www.bushflash.com/thanks.html