Printable View
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/041202/325/f7r0t.html
I wonder who has really won?
George was severely hindered from speaking out in April 03 when this broke and a newspaper that has traditionally been anti-Blair has been soundly embarrassed.
Somebody wins twice here and it is neither George or The Telegraph. :dry:
You have my sincerest sympathy, Big Les. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
You must be utterly...bereft. :D
Good Call...
Newspapers shouldnt be allowed to print stuff that hasn't been checked :lol:
Of Course, that doesnt mean he didn't... just that you actually need evidence before printing it ;)
Although I seem to recall that a certain broadcasting station got into a lot of trouble for far less. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
I may be wrong but I suspect that The Telegraph was pawned by some black propaganda. The documents plus their in-built hatred of George resulted in the massive day after day attacks. No doubt many years hence someone will come out the wordwork and say "yes I planted those documents" but as ever it will be purely for historical nicety.