Quote:
Originally posted by ne1GotZardoz@25 March 2003 - 00:02
What ever happened to that?
I'm American, but I'm afraid I have to point out a major falacy of American news reporters.
It is acceptable for a country to defend its interests by whatever means are at its disposal.
I think the reporters need to take a refresher course in American history.
Soldiers wearing whatever they grab on their way out the door is acceptable.
In a war where your country is being invaded, every man with a gun becomes a soldier.
If Iraq was invading us, I guarentee you I would not be wasting time at a uniform store.
And If the enemy was stupid enough to pass by me and give me a chance to attack them from the rear...Hell yeah I'd take that chance.
I think its funny that Bush talks about Iraq not following the normal protocol of war. We entered their country.
That means, they get choice of weapons.
They get choice of fighting style.
The British lost to the minute men, because the minute men did not follow acceptable protocols.
When you're out-gunned, only a fool would expect you to stand out in the open and shoot it out.
I just think thats funny.
Thats why I put it here.
What I think Bush was referring to, was using women and children as human shields. Rule or no rule, that is just wrong.