-
Child not pornogorgraphy
You know they just dance around few 3-5 years olds they gots to be /young/dumb .. lil bit of music, few crisps. We all pull our cute faces then boom ones run into the fcukin table chair, epic. Yay for child not pornography. :ghey: Tom green humped a moose, go for it. Dont fcuk children.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
You know they just dance around few 3-5 years olds they gots to be /young/dumb .. lil bit of music, few crisps. We all pull our cute faces then boom ones run into the fcukin table chair, epic. Yay for child not pornography. :ghey: Tom green humped a moose, go for it. Dont fcuk children.
Attachment 109586
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Lost me at thread title... :blink:
Anyone else think "thou protesteth too much", or something that's actually a quote...
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
This is my pledge to all peodophiles to stop molesting children, especially evers since time begun time also began. Its positive message. SAY NO TO STRANGERS, its real easy actually. Dumb Fcuks, not the point. I forgot the point, point being micheal jackson can sing and dance but please theres no way on gods earth he's allowed to stick his willy into bow wow like its not jail now. Again not the point. Rambling. Sorry.
STOP RECORDING MY EDITS PFFFFFFFFFF
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Run out of lithium I take it?
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
I want the junkie to stay and take Dave's place.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Fine instead of fearing for our safety we will just have to hide the valuables then.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
This is my pledge to all peodophiles to stop molesting children, especially evers since time begun time also began. Its positive message. SAY NO TO STRANGERS, its real easy actually. Dumb Fcuks, not the point. I forgot the point, point being micheal jackson can sing and dance but please theres no way on gods earth he's allowed to stick his willy into bow wow like its not jail now. Again not the point. Rambling. Sorry.
STOP RECORDING MY EDITS PFFFFFFFFFF
In this alternative reality Michael Jackson died...presumably in yours he was elected President.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
This is my pledge to all peodophiles to stop molesting children
I think you should be making the pledge to the children.
They are our future. Treat them well, and let them lead the way. Something. Something. Sense ooooof pride. Something. Laughter....
[chorus]
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
The World is Black .The World is White . So just beat it Billie Jean.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
The World is Black .The World is White . So just beat it Billie Jean.
Scooter trashing is another mumbling, incoherent rant issue altogether. :noes:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
And NOT to be taken lightly. :dry:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
Ebony and Ivory?:unsure:
...side by side on a pedo...
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Not sure if I side with OP. Not sure what OP's message is.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
You know they just dance around few 3-5 years olds they gots to be /young/dumb .. lil bit of music, few crisps. We all pull our cute faces then boom ones run into the fcukin table chair, epic. Yay for child not pornography. :ghey: Tom green humped a moose, go for it. Dont fcuk children.
This is very J-dye, but with twice the words :ghey:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
You know they just dance around few 3-5 years olds they gots to be /young/dumb .. lil bit of music, few crisps. We all pull our cute faces then boom ones run into the fcukin table chair, epic. Yay for child not pornography. :ghey: Tom green humped a moose, go for it. Dont fcuk children.
I'm pretty sure you're not supposed to fuck animals either so what is your message? :crazy:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
I pledge to whoever it needs pledging too. In all honestly whats a pledge ? I pledge to Bill gates to either abominate pedophillia or at least i will make one pledge a day to Bill Gates requesting so.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
I 'm pretty sure you're not supposed to fuck animals either so what is your message?
Funnily enough i never knew we forum posters/trolls/spammers needed a subliminal message imbedded in our posts until now. I am new and still cant work it out.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
I pledge to whoever it needs pledging too. In all honestly whats a pledge ? I pledge to Bill gates to either abominate pedophillia or at least i will make one pledge a day to Bill Gates requesting so.
errrr .... I don't ..... errrrr .... isn't it already ..... ummm ........ what? :blink:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by junglebook
{quote}Originally Posted by junglebook
You know they just dance around few 3-5 years olds they gots to be /young/dumb .. lil bit of music, few crisps. We all pull our cute faces then boom ones run into the fcukin table chair, epic. Yay for child not pornography. Tom green humped a moose, go for it. Dont fcuk children.
This is very J-dye, but with twice the words{quote]
Funnily enough i never knew we forum posters/trolls/spammers needed a subliminal message imbedded in our posts until now. I am new and still cant work it out.
It doesn't matter how many times you quote it, it's still moronic you spastic. If you structured your sentences so they actually made sense it would help your somewhat convoluted cause, as it is you can carry on repeating your diatribe as much as you want, each time you do the response will probably be more severe. Most of the people around here don't play nice, especially with rambling diatribes like yours.
My suggestion, get a maintenance level of meds back in your system, relax, and come back and post something slightly more coherent, or not, your choice. :idunno:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Why is j-dye using an FST stock avatar photo? Where are his effin' standards man? He's losing his touch.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Is Dave imitating J-Dye perhaps?
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Is Dave imitating J-Dye perhaps?
No I think we have a totally new and improved kind of fruitbat here. :naughty:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Artemis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Is Dave imitating J-Dye perhaps?
No I think we have a totally new and improved kind of fruitbat here. :naughty:
You my just be right. :fst:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Is Dave imitating J-Dye perhaps?
Quote:
Originally Posted by junglebook
I pledge to whoever it needs pledging too
:smilie4:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by junglebook
I pledge to whoever it needs pledging too
:smilie4:
The only thing I can take away is that J-Dye has higher standards than Dave.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Don't get too smug. I'm working my way up to answer one of your replies where you confused your and you're.
Again :mellow:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Don't get too smug. I'm working my way up to answer one of your replies where you confused your and you're.
Again :mellow:
Did you fall off your stepladder again? :blink:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
And not for the first time, it's hard work getting up onto this pedestal each time I post.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Don't get too smug. I'm working my way up to answer one of your replies where you confused your and you're.
Again :mellow:
Well you might as well send it now, because I do it basically every time I post. I don't know your style, but I type all my shit out then go back and proof it. You may not see me mixing it up, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen. In fact, it happened this very post :(
Generally I think it's in that direction... I always type you're then have to go back and fix all the appropriate ones to your. I'm not sure, but it just happened that way now.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Theory: my right pinky is sick of being underutilized.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Don't get too smug. I'm working my way up to answer one of your replies where you confused your and you're.
Again :mellow:
Well you might as well send it now, because I do it basically every time I post. I don't know your style, but I type all my shit out then go back and proof it. You may not see me mixing it up, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen. In fact, it happened this very post :(
Generally I think it's in that direction... I always type you're then have to go back and fix all the appropriate ones to your. I'm not sure, but it just happened that way now.
I don't actually use my right baby small for you're. I use ruby ring. Weird.
Anyway, I don't know how anyone gets it wrong. Perhaps if you started to say you are instead of you're in your mind when you are thinking stuff and eventually you'll train your mind to separate the two when you're writing.
Fuck your PhD, this is important stuffs.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
I don't actually use my right baby small for you're. I use ruby ring. Weird.
Anyway, I don't know how anyone gets it wrong. Perhaps if you started to say you are instead of you're in your mind when you are thinking stuff and eventually you'll train your mind to separate the two when you're writing.
Fuck your PhD, this is important stuffs.
You're not fully QWERTY compliant then. Also, your advice goes counter to my proposed theory.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
I like this guy.
He's grasped irony and I wasn't even aware that Mary was teaching it to him.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Topic's get'n pwnd! :whistling
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
I don't actually use my right baby small for you're. I use ruby ring. Weird.
Anyway, I don't know how anyone gets it wrong. Perhaps if you started to say you are instead of you're in your mind when you are thinking stuff and eventually you'll train your mind to separate the two when you're writing.
Fuck your PhD, this is important stuffs.
You're not fully QWERTY compliant then. Also, your advice goes counter to my proposed theory.
Your proposed theory smells.
My advice is compliant with something that's had a 100% success rate in a brazillion trials over the last, idk, quarter century or so.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
The feeling will be mutual the day the topic gets pwnd!
You're going to like yourself once the topic gets pwned.
I guess this is good news.
:blink:
Edit: stop with the AllenS spastic edits