Jaigandhi was too lazy to post but he wants to know which would perform better in games, etc.
His Athlon XP 2500+ which is OCed to 2.45ghz or an Athlon 64 3000+?
Printable View
Jaigandhi was too lazy to post but he wants to know which would perform better in games, etc.
His Athlon XP 2500+ which is OCed to 2.45ghz or an Athlon 64 3000+?
btw its a 2500+M which is running at 2.45Ghz and the 64bit 3000+ socket 754 which runs at 2.0ghz
In 32 bit mode the overclocked 2500+M would be faster.
Lazy ass:dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by rossco_2004
lol
This would......right? I thought more mhz = more speed.:unsure:Quote:
Athlon 64 3000+?
I dunno. I'll shut up now. 16 yr old ROSSCO knows twice what I know and he's asking so... :lol:
(that wasnt meant to offensive ROSSCO, your OK in my book no matter what they say. :lol: )
its an amd 3000+ runs at 2.0Ghz and i overclocked my 2500+M to 2.45Ghz so i have more MHz so mine is like a 3500+(i think)Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
btw its fun being lazy.. :)
btw im getting a 160Gb WD 7200rpm 8mb cache hdd today :D :D so 160+80=240Gb!!!! w00t! too much g1g4ness
hey, i just told him that if it's purely 32bit software they're comparing then it's going to be the 2500+ OCed that will be better. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
he wanted to ask though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
more MHz DOESNT mean more speed (unless its the same type of chip)!!!!!
why do you think an AMD 2600+ is called an AMD 2600+ and not a 1.95GHz?
its n00bs w0rld :lol:
im soo l33t someone stole my mhz!!!!111eleven11 :o :o :lol: