Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
Hi guys,
i would like to figure out what you think about Windows Seedbox,
would you prefer having Windows over Linux ?, Would you mind pay extra 5euro/month just to have Windows or you would just stick to linux to cut prices ?
Waiting for your replies
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
linux if harware sucks. if not windows was cool. there's no need for ultra-1337-pwnage of unix stability of debian etc for a simple seedbox.
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
i want seedbox windows and i will pay 5 euro for it ,,
but where can i find it ?
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
seedhost i think that you forgot something.
You do realize that windows web edition can only handle 1 connection at a time.
That means that when 1 user is connected the other one won't be able to connect.
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
I haven't forget anything,
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seedplace
seedhost i think that you forgot something.
You do realize that windows web edition can only handle 1 connection at a time.
That means that when 1 user is connected the other one won't be able to connect.
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
I only choose linux not because of some ideology, but because it's cheaper and better to run some clients like rtorrent and the very promising Deluge. It also supports in µTorrent in very good condition.
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seedplace
seedhost i think that you forgot something.
You do realize that windows web edition can only handle 1 connection at a time.
That means that when 1 user is connected the other one won't be able to connect.
Think you need to rethink your phrases... Web Edition has indeed got 1 RDP-connection but then again, it was never meant to be used in a multi-user environment. I have to disagree on "can only handle 1 connection at a time" since that might confuse people on the connections made from/to the internet with FTP/HTTP/P2P and so on.:)
/edit: just digging in my memory; wasn't Microsoft supplying 2 administrative logins per server-edition? Or has that changed between Server 2003 and Server 2008? Despite that, an administrative login is not actually to be used for user-based operations (like running torrents) but still...
Re: Seedbox with Windows, Would you prefer it ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FransTormer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seedplace
seedhost i think that you forgot something.
You do realize that windows web edition can only handle 1 connection at a time.
That means that when 1 user is connected the other one won't be able to connect.
Think you need to rethink your phrases... Web Edition has indeed got 1 RDP-connection but then again, it was never meant to be used in a multi-user environment. I have to disagree on "can only handle 1 connection at a time" since that might confuse people on the connections made from/to the internet with FTP/HTTP/P2P and so on.:)
/edit: just digging in my memory; wasn't Microsoft supplying 2 administrative logins per server-edition? Or has that changed between Server 2003 and Server 2008? Despite that, an administrative login is not actually to be used for user-based operations (like running torrents) but still...
I also said
"That means that when 1 user is connected the other one won't be able to connect"
I didn't meant through ftp or http but using remote desktop connection