-
Mods please make this into a poll, since the last one disapeared.
What should happen with Image Resized?
1. Leave it as it is
2. Image Resized should be upped to 500pxl
3. Max image size should be 600pxl wide
4. Max image size should be 700pxl wide
5. Max image size should be 800pxl wide
6. I dont care
Image Resized
[img]http://gallery.euroweb.hu/art/p/poussin/1/08midas.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'> ?
Image 500pxl
http://img16.photobucket.com/albums/...ax/08midas.jpg ?
The below functions after the blue borders are removed....
http://img16.photobucket.com/albums/v47/zedaxax/500.jpghttp://img16.photobucket.com/albums/v47/zedaxax/100.jpghttp://img16.photobucket.com/albums/v47/zedaxax/100.jpg
-
POLL
I voted:
Leave it as it is
-
-
-
I voted also
Leave as is
If you change it back users will go overboard with images posted plus when you post a image it can be up to 499 in width without image resize kicking in..
-
leave the size as it is, but change the 'image resized' message stand out from the rest of the post
-
-
-
What happened to the option to get rid of it altogether?
As far as I can tell it currently seems to resize based on the size in kb, not the width or depth in pixels. Since the whole image is downloaded anyway, it is of no benefit to 56kers, and since it is also possible to create a low quality image which will cause scroll bars to be used it doesn't fulfill that purpose either.
If the script can be changed to set a pixel limit and resize if exceeded then ok, I'd say go for 600, but resize to the current size. This would make people think a little more about the images they are posting. Don't forget you really need a vertical maximum too.
On the whole I say get rid of it, it was only introduced because of abuse by a small number of members and there are other ways of dealing with that sort of thing.
-