...attacking this wonderful man. :whistling
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008...deral-custody/
Printable View
...attacking this wonderful man. :whistling
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008...deral-custody/
Oh, are we feeling beset again, Kev?
Everybody is jumping on this slimeball- and rightly so.
Did you expect us libs to jump to his defense just because he is titularly a Democrat?
Sorry, better luck next time.
Beset?
Why should I feel beset?
BTW-
Do Larry Craig and "Duke" Cunningham qualify as "titular" republicans?
Is William Jefferson a "titular" democrat?
Why do you disavow Blagojevich?
I'd never even heard of the guy til yesterday...hard to "disavow" a stranger.
Let's hope our President Elect isn't involved in this three year probe. As much as I can't stand the guy, I'd hate to see a scandal of this magnitude before the inauguration.
Yes, it does, especially when republicans are never republicans "titularly", or "in name only" when they misbehave.
Liberals and the press report instead about "staunch", "rock-ribbed", "unapologetically" "hawkish" republicans, who are "morally far-right, thru-and-thru".
Why don't you let me know, the next time a Blagojevich wanders across the screen on CNN and is identified as a DEMOCRAT on first report.
Let me know the next time Barney Frank, "Big" Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, or, God forbid, Barry Obama be described as a "flaming liberal".
The problem is that Republicans are identified with being one-way about so many things while Democrats represent a bigger multitude of stances.
Republicans are identified as being bible thumpers, pro-gun, pro-life yet pro-death penalty, anti-tax, big business, pro-torture, and pro-Iraq war....all rolled into one.
It's like every Republican seems this exact way.