Printable View
i've been down that road of the second picture. in the church where the flags i see the Arizona Flag. the flag of the state i live in.
I never seen that ring of stars. The last pic on the very top very left there is a ring of stars. wierd
i think it might just have been the camera or light. it almost looks like a pattern
:lol: :lol: only took about 3 seconds too load on my adsl :rolleyes:Quote:
**** 56K death ***
I pitty the 56kers hahahahahahaa
MWAHAHAHAHA...
2 seconds on mine :DQuote:
Originally posted by neattairoski@7 December 2003 - 05:21
:lol: :lol: only took about 3 seconds too load on my adsl :rolleyes:Quote:
**** 56K death ***
I pitty the 56kers hahahahahahaa
MWAHAHAHAHA...
Mine will be along soon, I'll just make the beds. :huh:
:)
was there actually a point to this thread?
EDIT
no but they were close. :P
yes, everyone else got itQuote:
Originally posted by Sam Fishstick@7 December 2003 - 09:47
was there actually a point to this thread?
just wait for the pictures to load, it takes awhile for people like you on 56k
cool pics RTJM but are they gigapixel :unsure:
that road looks creepy one of them jeepers creepers style get killed roads
do people like do 200 miles down that road?
looks like sedona (the road pic)
cool pics didnt even even notice alag in loading time just about 1 sec and it popped up i love dsl
0.23 seconds for me...
lol you have gigapixel images but they are compressed with jpeg which removes pixels.
so i dont think they are any more.
isn't the biggest image in the world something like 100GB? :blink:
hell i know i could render a 100 gb picture, (maya helps) but i would say it depends on what you use to make the picture...
If a camera made that pic that was 100gb then i would be amazed...
If a computer made it... then i would not be surprizzed...
If a camera Can take a picture and then have the time to record all the data then i would be amazed.. if it was a harddrive it would take forver to take a pic...
i believe it was the hubble telescope...my figure is probably a long way off, i'll try and find it againQuote:
Originally posted by SciManAl@7 December 2003 - 18:16
hell i know i could render a 100 gb picture, (maya helps) but i would say it depends on what you use to make the picture...
If a camera made that pic that was 100gb then i would be amazed...
If a computer made it... then i would not be surprizzed...
If a camera Can take a picture and then have the time to record all the data then i would be amazed.. if it was a harddrive it would take forver to take a pic...