id have to say 2 i liked the battle for helmsdeep :01:
Printable View
id have to say 2 i liked the battle for helmsdeep :01:
i didn't like the action-less scenes, far too slow paced - all of them could have done with about an hour less of film, especially ROTK with the damn epilogue, and a bit less homoerotism - but if i blank out all the bad bits they're good films
r u kidding? lotr is a one of the best trilogies, aside from star wars and back to the future and indiana jones
poo
lotr was wkd ;)
lotr 2 was even better :)
lotr 3 was even better :D
can't wait for the hobbet to be filmed and releast in 2007????
:o i aint waitin that long :angry:Quote:
Originally posted by foot loose@9 May 2004 - 17:24
lotr was wkd ;)
lotr 2 was even better :)
lotr 3 was even better :D
can't wait for the hobbet to be filmed and releast in 2007????
I really liked the trilogy.
It was a truly epic story and an even bigger task of making it into a movie, but very well done. Many of the die-hard fans of the books bitched about specifics and I can see their point, but some people fail to account for the fact that each was a movie you watch in one sitting, not something you curl up with for several days or more. :lol:
-- Xero Grid --
True classics of our time.....
50 years from now, it'll still be discussed.
There's this little thing called an "opinion". You don't sound as though you've heard of it.Quote:
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@9 May 2004 - 14:49
r u kidding? lotr is a one of the best trilogies, aside from star wars and back to the future and indiana jones
My frens, i dont noe bout u but im cryin over the good quality of this trilogy. In fact, i only appreciated the whole thing after i watched the third movie and rewatched all three on dvd but now...there gone!! :( :'(