What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
This is a extra poll connected to this poll:
http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...tracker-275032
The reason I am asking is because a particular site that has an upload only system has extremely fast pretimes, all the seeders are on 100mb/s lines...but people dont download that much.
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
More seeders for the sake of what bittorent is all about sharing. The more people seeding the torrent the longer it will be alive (hopefully).
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
more seeders is always better so if someone stop seeding due to problems or he is just tired with that you always have plenty of other seeders.
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
"More seeders with an average speed"
For i can seed back, if it's only seedboxes seeding i will upload not even 1Mb.
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Gladiator
"More seeders with an average speed"
For i can seed back, if it's only seedboxes seeding i will upload not even 1Mb.
The poll is in regards to a non ratio site...so you dont have to worry about maintaining a ratio.
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fatcat69
This is a extra poll connected to this poll:
http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...tracker-275032
The reason I am asking is because a particular site that has an upload only system has extremely fast pretimes, all the seeders are on 100mb/s lines...but people dont download that much.
could that possibly stem from a very small userbase (small as in under 6k?)
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tokeman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fatcat69
This is a extra poll connected to this poll:
http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...tracker-275032
The reason I am asking is because a particular site that has an upload only system has extremely fast pretimes, all the seeders are on 100mb/s lines...but people dont download that much.
could that possibly stem from a very small userbase (small as in under 6k?)
Yes, but the issue is not only the small userbase, as there are other sites with just as small userbases that dont have this issue.
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
more seeders because not only will the torrent stay active for longer, but when you snatch something, you have no idea how fast the seeder's connection is, so more seeders is more likely to be faster.
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fatcat69
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Gladiator
"More seeders with an average speed"
For i can seed back, if it's only seedboxes seeding i will upload not even 1Mb.
The poll is in regards to a non ratio site...so you dont have to worry about maintaining a ratio.
Ok.. So my choice still the same for the same reason of fusionz, if one seedboxe blows up we will download nothing.
Re: What is better more seeders, or less seeders with faster speeds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tedsfrozenhead
more seeders because not only will the torrent stay active for longer, but when you snatch something, you have no idea how fast the seeder's connection is, so more seeders is more likely to be faster.
What if say 3 out of the 5 seeders were on 100mb/s lines?