Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCNKahG1ksg
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1276104/
Humour me and comment or something as obviously I don't do this for my health.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
Yeah. Maybe in the future there are ballistic detectors in every corner and robots at the ready to apprehend folk with murder on their minds.
And they haven't yet cottoned onto the time-travel hitman business.
30 years hence seems to be over-estimating technological advances. But I guess the 'kill the future me' storyline is kinda binding in that respect.
I'm going to watch this as it's intriguing and I think Bruce Willis isn't going suck this time.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
.
30 years hence seems to be over-estimating technological advances.
Hollywood is very good at that. To be on the safe side I think they either need to have the foresight to set films hundreds of years hence or else just have signs with gas costing $60 a litre and limit technological advances to bigger TVs and cooler cellphones.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
You aren't going to believe this, but I found a plot hole. Bruce Willis equals an aged Levitt?
Anyways, won't watch unless the trailer is completely misleading and they had an actually sensible reason for sending everyone back into the same time period to be killed. It's not impossible, but I just got the feeling that this premise wasn't well thought out.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
You aren't going to believe this, but I found a plot hole. Bruce Willis equals an aged Levitt?
Anyways, won't watch unless the trailer is completely misleading and they had an actually sensible reason for sending everyone back into the same time period to be killed. It's not impossible, but I just got the feeling that this premise wasn't well thought out.
The trailer doesn't show it but there are tentacles and schoolgirls who grow penises.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
You aren't going to believe this, but I found a plot hole. Bruce Willis equals an aged Levitt?
Anyways, won't watch unless the trailer is completely misleading and they had an actually sensible reason for sending everyone back into the same time period to be killed. It's not impossible, but I just got the feeling that this premise wasn't well thought out.
The trailer doesn't show it but there are tentacles and schoolgirls who grow penises.
Have I not made clear that magic penises are OK, but tentacles are not? When you bundle them together I get the weirdest boner.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
The trailer doesn't show it but there are tentacles and schoolgirls who grow penises.
Have I not made clear that magic penises are OK, but tentacles are not? When you bundle them together I get the weirdest boner.
Sorry I should have paid more attention but I sort of lose focus when you and manker compare various perversions.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
Yeah whatever.
There is no comparison. My perversions are clearly better by far.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Yeah whatever.
There is no comparison. My perversions are clearly better by far.
You only think that because you enjoy eating oysters and squid.
Re: Looper or aren't there a lot simplier ways to kill a person?
Stay out of my threads perverts.