Quote:
Originally posted by chinook_apache@14 October 2003 - 21:28
i dunno who it was and they said xp is too comerical and i rekon it is. like here in the uk xp home is like preloaded on all new pc's. i still prefer 2k. its very stable compared to hogging xp which hogs tons of ram! im currently running .net server 2003 and i find that just as stable as 2k and it doesnt hog the ram like xp. ppl fall for xp's new sleek look but thats another farce from m$!
conclusion
Windows 2000 better
ive ran both xp and windows 2k in the past, XP doesnt hog RAM if you have a half decent PC and is lots better! ive ran XP on a p3 850mhz, with 512SD RAM, with zero problems aswell!