I knew you were already sure of that before you posted it.
Only because I'm sure you do impressions
01-07-2012, 11:52 PM
NotLettingItGo
Re: New Year Resolutions
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
Only because I'm sure you do impressions
Yeah, but your predictability isn't particularly impressive.
01-08-2012, 12:04 AM
mjmacky
Re: New Year Resolutions
Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
Only because I'm sure you do impressions
Yeah, but your predictability isn't particularly impressive.
You chose that post to springboard predictability?
01-08-2012, 01:33 AM
NotLettingItGo
Re: New Year Resolutions
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
You chose that post to springboard predictability?
No that happened earlier when you posted the statistics which required a 42% tolerance level.
01-08-2012, 07:17 AM
Quarterquack
Re: New Year Resolutions
Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
You chose that post to springboard predictability?
No that happened earlier when you posted the statistics which required a 42% tolerance level.
You know, sample volatility often returns a 42% or higher resultant range.
There's other statistical indicators to account for its significance, its accuracy against other ranges etc.
01-08-2012, 08:04 AM
mjmacky
Re: New Year Resolutions
I have to admit, I have a slight urge to show reject what a bell curve is and why a gaussian distribution matters. He wouldn't be freaking out so much and I find his edge and angst unpleasant.
01-08-2012, 03:54 PM
megabyteme
Re: New Year Resolutions
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
I have to admit, I have a slight urge to show reject what a bell curve is and why a gaussian distribution matters. He wouldn't be freaking out so much and I find his edge and angst unpleasant.
You have to forgive him, macky. It's been months since he almost had a point. He just got a bit over-zealous.