Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
You're not fully QWERTY compliant then. Also, your advice goes counter to my proposed theory.
Your proposed theory smells.
My advice is compliant with something that's had a 100% success rate in a brazillion trials over the last, idk, quarter century or so.
Will have 0 % success rate if I type you're instead of your...
mind visuals won't help my fingers, I type faster than I can picture the words in my head.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
Topic's get'n pwnd! :whistling
As I have patiently tried to explain, analprobeboi, we don't understand what the topic is, because you haven't managed to structure a coherent sentence about your subject.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
He's going to start arguing about what is filesharing and what isn't.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Your proposed theory smells.
My advice is compliant with something that's had a 100% success rate in a brazillion trials over the last, idk, quarter century or so.
Will have 0 % success rate if I type you're instead of your...
mind visuals won't help my fingers, I type faster than I can picture the words in my head.
Unless the grey matter within your spinal column dictates the formulation of your prose, which might explain much come to think about it, I can't see how that could be possible.
Can't you just type a little slower :idunno:
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
I can't see how that could be possible.
Can't you just type a little slower :idunno:
Using you're method
Scenario 1: Wants to type something that sounds like your, possibles are your and you're
Scenario 2: Wants to type something that sounds like you are, possibles are you are, shorten to you're
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
I wasn't done but had to post that, you see what the fuck I did there. Seriously, I mistyped it while composing a post about it!
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
The final part was this:
The only reason any of my posts manage to come across as a coherent message is because of heavy editing.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Drunken drivers have a tendency to yaw all over the road.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
I wasn't done but had to post that, you see what the fuck I did there. Seriously, I mistyped it while composing a post about it!
In the post you replied to, I wrote 'dictates the your formulation'.
If there is a message here, it's that the omniscient grammar gods don't want to fix you.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
The final part was this:
The only reason any of my posts manage to come across as a coherent message is because of heavy editing.
Just how fat is your editor? :blink: