Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
And not for the first time, it's hard work getting up onto this pedestal each time I post.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Don't get too smug. I'm working my way up to answer one of your replies where you confused your and you're.
Again :mellow:
Well you might as well send it now, because I do it basically every time I post. I don't know your style, but I type all my shit out then go back and proof it. You may not see me mixing it up, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen. In fact, it happened this very post :(
Generally I think it's in that direction... I always type you're then have to go back and fix all the appropriate ones to your. I'm not sure, but it just happened that way now.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Theory: my right pinky is sick of being underutilized.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Don't get too smug. I'm working my way up to answer one of your replies where you confused your and you're.
Again :mellow:
Well you might as well send it now, because I do it basically every time I post. I don't know your style, but I type all my shit out then go back and proof it. You may not see me mixing it up, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen. In fact, it happened this very post :(
Generally I think it's in that direction... I always type you're then have to go back and fix all the appropriate ones to your. I'm not sure, but it just happened that way now.
I don't actually use my right baby small for you're. I use ruby ring. Weird.
Anyway, I don't know how anyone gets it wrong. Perhaps if you started to say you are instead of you're in your mind when you are thinking stuff and eventually you'll train your mind to separate the two when you're writing.
Fuck your PhD, this is important stuffs.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
I don't actually use my right baby small for you're. I use ruby ring. Weird.
Anyway, I don't know how anyone gets it wrong. Perhaps if you started to say you are instead of you're in your mind when you are thinking stuff and eventually you'll train your mind to separate the two when you're writing.
Fuck your PhD, this is important stuffs.
You're not fully QWERTY compliant then. Also, your advice goes counter to my proposed theory.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
I like this guy.
He's grasped irony and I wasn't even aware that Mary was teaching it to him.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Topic's get'n pwnd! :whistling
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
I don't actually use my right baby small for you're. I use ruby ring. Weird.
Anyway, I don't know how anyone gets it wrong. Perhaps if you started to say you are instead of you're in your mind when you are thinking stuff and eventually you'll train your mind to separate the two when you're writing.
Fuck your PhD, this is important stuffs.
You're not fully QWERTY compliant then. Also, your advice goes counter to my proposed theory.
Your proposed theory smells.
My advice is compliant with something that's had a 100% success rate in a brazillion trials over the last, idk, quarter century or so.
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
The feeling will be mutual the day the topic gets pwnd!
You're going to like yourself once the topic gets pwned.
I guess this is good news.
:blink:
Edit: stop with the AllenS spastic edits