I use stereo.Quote:
Originally posted by Benno@3 March 2003 - 15:14
I 've got a question to all people using dbpoweramp.
What should I choose as channels under compression settings?
Joint stereo, stereo, dual channel?? :unsure:
Printable View
I use stereo.Quote:
Originally posted by Benno@3 March 2003 - 15:14
I 've got a question to all people using dbpoweramp.
What should I choose as channels under compression settings?
Joint stereo, stereo, dual channel?? :unsure:
Do you know what the difference is?
I always used joint stereo as yet. Is it smaller, worse quality..? :huh:
;) Haveing problems ripping some CDs right now.....will try to make this short and get back to ya. :blink:Quote:
Originally posted by Benno@3 March 2003 - 15:19
Do you know what the difference is?
I always used joint stereo as yet. Is it smaller, worse quality..? :huh:
Stereo VS Joint Stereo
Ok thanks.
If I got it right joint stereo is smaller than stereo because it uses some kind of additional compression?
No, as far as I know it would make no difference, however TechTV did test some of those disc fixers and they found some that actually worked. I mean they scratched some discs pretty bad and were able to use one of those disc fixers to make them readable. I would say check out Techtv.com and look for the "The Screensavers link, search for disc fixers, it may just be worthwhile for you in the long run. But I do have to say you need to try CDEX, TechTV found it to be the best ripper for music out there in their trials, so that is what I use, I did not use anything else ever so I am not the guy to ask what may be different, but it works beautifully for me.Quote:
Originally posted by FuNkY CaPrIcOrN@3 March 2003 - 15:12
:huh: Is CDex good at ripping CDs that are in bad shape(scratches and what not),sometimes have hard time with old CDs ripping that are scratched?From what I have always understood no Ripper/Encoder can help that. :huh:
That's all I needed to know. :DQuote:
Originally posted by FuNkY CaPrIcOrN@3 March 2003 - 20:12
It only uses LAME 3.92 as far as I know.But I don't mind. :D
I like a program that gives you choices, so CDex is still the best one for me! :D
That's all I needed to know. :DQuote:
Originally posted by DataMore+3 March 2003 - 15:53--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DataMore @ 3 March 2003 - 15:53)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--FuNkY CaPrIcOrN@3 March 2003 - 20:12
It only uses LAME 3.92 as far as I know.But I don't mind. :D
I like a program that gives you choices, so CDex is still the best one for me! :D [/b][/quote]
:) I don't mind LAME.....can you use LAME with CDex? :)
How fast it it too.....might try it out?
my vote goes to CDEX aswell. it's an excellent ripper, i can really recomend it.
Yeah you can and if a new version of Lame comes out, you can just download the Lame .dll file and replace the old one in CDex's main folder. :)Quote:
Originally posted by FuNkY CaPrIcOrN@3 March 2003 - 20:55
:) I don't mind LAME.....can you use LAME with CDex? :)
The same goes to a bunch of other encoders. ;)
CD DEX