i didn't pay any attention to the run up to the ban but to me it seems that if someone is banned they have been "set free" to roam and graze outside of the confines of the prison we call the forum :lol: Surely the campaign should be to re-capture him.Quote:
Originally posted by vidcc+29 March 2004 - 12:28--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (vidcc @ 29 March 2004 - 12:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Busyman@29 March 2004 - 08:08
He's banned anyway. I don't think they eve unbann someone. Obviously alot of thought went the banning in the first place.
He hasn't been locked up has he?
edit...busy....just quoting you because you posted about the ban...Don't shoot me man :lol: :lol: [/b][/quote]
:lol: Tons of typos. I know man. :lol: :lol:
Ole Billy De...er bowrabob doesn't understand that Banned under a name means ..well,,,,BANNNNNNED!!!
Get over it Billy. You get to post under your friend's name. That should be enough. I personally wouldn't have banned you but at the same time sometimes you should have just STFU or at the very least stated your numerous cases with some decorum. ;) (I still never forgot your 9/11 comment)
Shot yourself in the foot.