Changing the history in the name of belives and money

[limesqueezer]

The group of people in leading positions are always right and people before them were wrong like they always say and how it goes since king and queens. Exactly this you can now follow on our tv, since christians start running things step by step here. Now they want to denie & hide everything bad about christians in past and now, even changing the history books.
Here is the story: a priest and his SS friend killed thousands of people in world war 2 in our country, hand people over to the nazis for execution because they were fighting against Hitler. Now they want to wash the sins of the priest right off his grave by telling that he was not a traitor of our nation, like it is on paper since now. In history books there will be from now on; that he was fighting for freedom upon communism. The SS leader will be also free from all his guilt and from now on known as a savior of our nation.



Freedom !

[JPaul]

If you adblock the images you can actually read his post.

As usual it isn't worth the bother.

Basically it boils down to "The winners write the history books"

No shit, Sherlock.

[GepperRankins]

i didn't realise comunism was still the bogey man.

how many years since the beginning of the cold war and people still don't see the irony in protecting democracy by demonising people who don't think like you

[limesqueezer]

We never were into communism. Socialism it was. It was more like the weak & scared people betrayed their own people and became christian nazis, and the poor were fighting for their exsistence, cause they couldn't go anywhere. We joined the ones that helped us fight Nazis and those were communists. I think it makes a difference who was a national hero and who was was the bringer of holocaust.

[j2k4]

I think it makes a difference who was a national hero and who was was the bringer of holocaust.

As between Stalin and Hitler?

[100%]

Does this mean that all who use some crappy graphics programs
to remove "red eye" are doing it "in the name of belives and money"?

[limesqueezer]

As between Stalin and Hitler?

Don't forget your own shit

If a priest joins nazis and kills his own people it is because of money and to say it in your language j2k4; he sure has no soul. If than later they wash his name in history books from convicted to hero it is because of belives in christianity. To say it short: everybody that changes history and makes out of sadists good people is sick in the head. Every war was and is about some stupid extremist fuck that claims he is poor and makes good when he is only caring for himself.

Does this mean that all who use some crappy graphics programs
to remove "red eye" are doing it "in the name of belives and money"?

Nowdays mostly for money. Religions wouldn't have so many followers in politics if it wasn't for the profit. Who cares what is written in holy book or what poor jesus was preaching.
When life is hard you see how much their belives meant to them, in war most of loud preachers follow the money and in communism they all become communists, thats how it is. But what is really wrong is when people change history that haven't even been there when it happend and try to know it better than people that were fighting for future.

[j2k4]

Don't forget your own shit

If a priest joins nazis and kills his own people it is because of money and to say it in your language j2k4; he sure has no soul. If than later they wash his name in history books from convicted to hero it is because of belives in christianity. To say it short: everybody that changes history and makes out of sadists good people is sick in the head. Every war was and is about some stupid extremist fuck that claims he is poor and makes good when he is only caring for himself.

I am afraid the gulf of language disparity here cannot be breached.

In other words, I can't understand your post; you seem to be trying to make some point about revisionist history, though if I am correct you may not be able to tell me so.

[limesqueezer]

Maybe if i draw it you would understand, but i don't have time for that right now, like i don't have time for people that take it personal, its no use.

[j2k4]

Maybe if i draw it you would understand, but i don't have time for that right now, like i don't have time for people that take it personal, its no use.

Are you better at drawing than language?

Never mind that-you have an unidentifiable sensibility and post as if you think you are mystifying those of us who correspond, but clap-trap is clap-trap, no matter the intent.

As you say, "its no use".

Enjoy your thread.