wOOt! AMD whooped Intel....

[fkdup74]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2005...pcworld/123474

it's just for one month, but hey......
maybe ppl are finally waking up

oh yeah, another interesting link:
http://yahoo.pcworld.com/yahoo/artic...,122284,00.asp

Intel, in Santa Clara, California, could not be reached for comment early Tuesday.

[Shiranai_Baka]

AMD has always been Number one in my book .

[fkdup74]

AMD has always been Number one in my book .

well, yeah, same here
but now AMD is gettin some love, with higher sales (about freakin' time)
(speaking of which, I just gave em a couple hundred myself)

maybe they can take 2 months in a row.......

[S!X]

AMD has always been Number one in my book .

Yep, even tho Ive never had one myself, Im rootin for em

[silent h3ro]

AMD Ownage.

[Smith]

My next rig will be AMD based (3500+)

[Virtualbody1234]

AMD has always been Number one in my book .

Not to me. Intel had a better product before the AMD Thunderbird.

[Darth Sushi]

My next rig will be AMD based (3500+)

I have this cpu and I'm very happy with it...my only complaint is: my intel 3.0GHz is faster when it comes to encoding video. But the 3500+ kicks ass when doing everything else.

[fkdup74]

My next rig will be AMD based (3500+)

I have this cpu and I'm very happy with it...my only complaint is: my intel 3.0GHz is faster when it comes to encoding video. But the does 3500+ kicks ass when doing everything else.

I notice that trend in just about every benchmark I've ever read

@Canuk - I just put in a 3500 Venice, pretty nice,
and I'm choking it right now with PC2700, single channel even
when I get my dual channel setup on PC3200 it should scream

[silent h3ro]

My next rig will be AMD based (3500+)

I've got a 3500+ as well. Very fast cpu. Although my next computer will have an X2 in it (prolly 4400+).