Oh.Originally Posted by Busyman
I guess he means ilw.
I forgot about Ian.
Other guyS, then.
en(un)lightened
Oh.I guess he means ilw.
I forgot about Ian.
Other guyS, then.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Thanks for finally answering.I do, but logic restricts me to forcing the issue only at the point such can be positively determined to have occurred.
I would be pained to hold someone's access to a preventive "pill" on a mere presumption.
You realize, of course, that no one would be the wiser until pre-natal care is sought, so the point is, practically, (though sadly) moot.
Again, I reserve the right to revise and extend.
How do you justify the killing of a person in cases of rape or incest?
How do you justify the possible killing of a person just because it's not provable?
You must understand that I see contradictions in your thinking.
Your logic...
1. A fertilized egg is a person.
2. This person can be killed to save the mother.
3. This person can be killed if the mother was raped.
4. This person can be killed if the mother was incestuous.
5. It ok to use the morning after pill since, in each instance of it's use, there is no proof that a person was killed. However, it has been proven that the morning after pill does kill a person in the womb but not in all instances.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Oh ok.Oh.I guess he means ilw.
I forgot about Ian.
Other guyS, then.
Biggles and vidcc (with his one comment).
I understand.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
there is no god
was this the "unwarrented conclusion"
Oh.
I forgot about Ian.
Other guyS, then.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
en(un)lightened
Okay, have it your way, then:Thanks for finally answering.
How do you justify the killing of a person in cases of rape or incest?
How do you justify the possible killing of a person just because it's not provable?
You must understand that I see contradictions in your thinking.
Indeed I do, and I freely acknowledge them, but would you throw over the whole argument against abortion because of a narrowly-applicable insolubility?
Do you see any contradictions in the pro-abortion stance, at all, at all.
Your logic...
1. A fertilized egg is a person.
2. This person can be killed to save the mother.
3. This person can be killed if the mother was raped.
4. This person can be killed if the mother was incestuous.
5. It ok to use the morning after pill since, in each instance of it's use, there is no proof that a person was killed. However, it has been proven that the morning after pill does kill a person in the womb but not in all instances.
In a perfect world, the pregnant victim of a rape wants the baby, carries it to term, and gives birth.
The rapist is found, guilt is determined, and he is summarily (but humanely) euthanized.
In a perfect world, the victim of incest (presumably a minor) wants the baby, carries it to term and gives birth.
The incestuous offender will be found, tried for guilt, and summarily shot.
If it is determined the baby has been born with any congenital defect, the incestuous offender will be shot twice.
Users of RU-486 or the like get a pass, owing to the aforementioned "loophole".
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
en(un)lightened
I am reasonable, but since you were enamored of dragging in shit from other threads, I figured I'd try it to see how it worked.was this the "unwarrented conclusion"
If you sincerely desire an exclusion of your own, I will grant it, but only after you state your case, so I can determine if it is...reasonable.
It's a goose/gander thing, you see.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Actually I do throw out most of the argument against abortion because the crux of the argument is that a fertilized egg is a person. Yet you deem it ok to kill a person is cases of
1. Rape
2. Incest
3. Dubious unprovables
It's quite simple.
What's the pro-abortion stance?
Last edited by Busyman; 03-09-2006 at 01:28 AM.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
there is no god
don't be so harsh on yourself, I may often disagree with your posts, and sometimes wonder how someone can type so much and not actually say anything, but I never think of your posts as "shit"
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
en(un)lightened
The pro-abortion stance promotes the provision of absolutely unfettered access by the full age-range of impregnable females to the widest possible variety of abortion procedures without concern for parental or marital notifications, no questions asked.
A shroud of non-accountabilty is granted to protect and insulate the providers of such services from inquiry by the public which funds their activities.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Where's the contradiction?The pro-abortion stance promotes the provision of absolutely unfettered access by the full age-range of impregnable females to the widest possible variety of abortion procedures without concern for parental or marital notifications, no questions asked.
A shroud of non-accountabilty is granted to protect and insulate the providers of such services from inquiry by the public which funds their activities.I don't think there is one pro choice or pro life stance.
While I don't agree with the stance you laid out, it make more sense than your stance. The basic point of your stance is inconsistent. You aim is to protect the unborn 'cause it's a person yet would kill it either due to YOUR perceived inconvenience or ignorance of there being a killing when it has been proven that certain medicine does kill.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
I don't think there is one pro choice or pro life stance.
Bookmarks