Originally Posted by
Busyman™
I don't think that's Chinese style. It would be a requirement for getting state money. Surely you wouldn't want mom's to receive state money, have no job, and just sit on her ass (or laying on her back) getting pregnant so the state will kick out MORE money?
You have to know that this would exacerbate the problem since there is a new infant tying mom down to take care of.
I mean she could always refuse and not receive state money. No civil rights would be violated either way.
The cost of that shot would outweigh the cost kicked out for a newborn. That's for sure.
So you don't see any similarity to chinese child producing policy?
I agree with all the bit about not wanting someone on welfare to keep producing children. To me welfare should be a safety net, not an alternative wage source to allow people to become parasites. There are lots of things wrong with the system including the minmum wage being so low discouraging people with families from working...but that's a different subject.
Linking mandatory contraception to welfare payments, no matter how it's justifed, leads us down the chinese human rights road we condemn.
Bookmarks