Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: SuperTorrents bans BitComet

  1. #1
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    46
    Posts
    22,943
    Last edited by Skizo; 03-23-2006 at 05:13 PM.


    yo

  2. BitTorrent   -   #2
    Colt Seevers's Avatar P()()p!3 $CR/-\P3R$ BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    1,410
    Good, it was well over due.

    Don't let the door smack yer arse on the way out.

  3. BitTorrent   -   #3
    Skillian's Avatar T H F C f a n BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,748
    Is there anyone left that supports BitComet?

  4. BitTorrent   -   #4
    Tempestv's Avatar Engineer
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    680
    my bit Comet was running great before spring break, came back afterwords, and now it is running shity.
    Plan for the worst, hope for the best

  5. BitTorrent   -   #5
    j0hn's Avatar leet poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    811
    Quote Originally Posted by Skizo
    Bye-bye SuperTorrents.
    i think not
    it was a good decision
    the only ppl who think it wasnt, are bitcomet users(obviouslt they're not gonna like it).
    but why should the rest of us suffer?
    i point out bitcomets faults time and time again, yet its users still defend it.
    for downloading for public trackers, fine, use it.
    i dont see why any private community would want such a client though.

    bitcomet favours other bitcomet users. if 2 clients request a connection, and 1 is bitcomet, and the other isnt, then the bitcomet user would get priority.
    fair? - no

    bitcomet hammers the tracker, over and over
    good for the tracker? - no

    bitcomet 0.60 had the ability to enable dht on private torrents. this defeats the purpose of private trackers.

    rather than changing to a fairer client, or wanting these issues resolved, many bitcomet users used a patch to fake the client version, to stop trackers/clients knowing they were using bitcomet. each of these reasons on their own, is enough to ban bitcomet from private trackers. all of these together, is madness not to.

    the only good thing ive ever seen bitcomet do is use the same encryption as azureus/µtorrent. thats my 2 cents

  6. BitTorrent   -   #6
    FoxStarwind
    Guest
    I think it's time most people take a look at utorrent anyways. Uses much less system resources, and has a nifty search feature on the upper right hand corner.

    Azureus is good, but using it hogs system resources.

  7. BitTorrent   -   #7
    ^^^agreed. uTorrent is much better than Azureus. I've used both extensively and uTorrent is the clear winner.

  8. BitTorrent   -   #8
    j0hn's Avatar leet poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    811
    personally ive never tried azureus, although i hear good things about it
    but i run my bittorrent client 24/7, constantly seeding.
    so having a client thats low in system resources is my top priority.
    and µtorrent does this for me.
    i like the fact azureus is open source though, says alot in itself.

  9. BitTorrent   -   #9
    everyone bans bitcomet its no surprise

  10. BitTorrent   -   #10
    Poster BT Rep: +9BT Rep +9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    66
    i used to use bitcomet but switch to the better utorrent

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •