Would you rather...

[tesco]

I'd fucking shoot them.

No you wouldn't.

You're a silly wee boy who would be very afraid if someone asked you to hold a loaded firearm. Never mind kill someone with it.

Grow up, come back, talk to people who have actually lived a bit.

So...Have you been in this situation before?

[Carcinus]

I made the poll, so my rules state there is no box. There is only you, with the option of shooting a stranger or cutting your hand off.

Ok I'd rather do neither then.

Isn't it fun this way...making new options when the ones presented aren't satisfactory?

The challenge is to examine your instincts versus your reasoning and morality with restricted and unpalatable options. It's a game often played where I used to work when we were bored.

Another example would be, would you rather eat a maggoty dead squirrel or eat one of your female relations' tampons, and you HAVE to do one.

Yes it childish but it does force you to examine your reasoning with limited distasteful options.

[Seedler]

What about...

Anally fuck the ugliest and most disgusting girl alive or get raped by manker?

[JPaul]

No you wouldn't.

You're a silly wee boy who would be very afraid if someone asked you to hold a loaded firearm. Never mind kill someone with it.

Grow up, come back, talk to people who have actually lived a bit.

So...Have you been in this situation before?

Life or death. Yes, a few times, it's less fun than it's cracked up to be.

The specific scenario as described in this thread, no. However it's unlikely that many people have.

[JPaul]

What about...

Anally fuck the ugliest and most disgusting girl alive or get raped by manker?

As if to prove my point.

[tesco]

So...Have you been in this situation before?

Life or death. Yes, a few times, it's less fun than it's cracked up to be.

The specific scenario as described in this thread, no. However it's unlikely that many people have.

What kind of life or death?
I think everyone's been in that, technically.

[Carcinus]

What about...

Anally fuck the ugliest and most disgusting girl alive or get raped by manker?

See thats what I'm talking about. A highly improbable situation with a limited selection of options. Therefore you have to consider all options, including that thing about the box mentioned earlier. In the situation just given we must consider whether doing something by choice, in this case the fucking, however disgusting it may be, is to my mind better than having the choice taken away from you, and being raped.

To other people it may be better to have the responsibility for making the choice removed, and rape preferable to anally fucking a repulsive woman.

It's interesting to see the reasoning, not just the response.

[Busyman]

Ok I'd rather do neither then.

Isn't it fun this way...making new options when the ones presented aren't satisfactory?

The challenge is to examine your instincts versus your reasoning and morality with restricted and unpalatable options. It's a game often played where I used to work when we were bored.

Another example would be, would you rather eat a maggoty dead squirrel or eat one of your female relations' tampons, and you HAVE to do one.

Yes it childish but it does force you to examine your reasoning with limited distasteful options.

Yes but it feels nice and comfortable to just make another option.

The options presented were not palatable.

I'm really liking this, btw. You seem very logical.

[maebach]

shoot somebody.

[fkdup74]

How is the hand to be amputated?
That may seriously influence my decision.
Also, do I get any anesthesia? At least a beer fer cryin' out loud...

I may just have to shoot the poor bastard....