Originally Posted by
Chip Monk
So, enlighten me, what would the normal, natural function be, which involved the arse as a way of getting things into the body. As stated earlier, this isn't a moral judgement we're talking about here, so try not to use those tricks again. Were talking biology.
The arse is used to get ........... into the body. This function is used in order to allow us to ........... Please fill in the blanks for me.
Oh deary me
I don't think anal nor oral sex is a normal, natural biological function to get stuff into the body. I've never said I did. A chap earlier implied disagreement with this statement in its entirety purely because of the 'in door' nature of the mouth.
I mentioned it not because I disagreed with your, Chip Monk's, post but because you mentioned mumbo-jumbo and it put me in mind of it.
I think I'll post this sentence again for no other reason than it's particularly well constructed and I'm rather fond of it; "
Simply put, if a mouthful of cawk can be described as 'not wrong' soley because the mouth can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'. Then an arseful of cawk can also be described as 'not wrong' because the arse can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door' ".
Bookmarks