Prove it, show me where he said that.
Bullshit.You also say that agnostics require proof. The combination of those positions is that theists and atheists require proof, even if they don't realise it.
Getting desperate here Lynx, you'll be bringing Father Christmas into it next.The analogy shows Huxley's ideas to be total poppycock, hence it is completely relevant. The proposal that ideas don't need to be disproved for them to be disregarded doesn't dissolve just because the word god is introduced into the mix.
If you say so, I've much more interesting things to do than trying to unravel your mind, or continue arguing over what you think people meant whilst totally disregarding what they said.In a situation where belief is a factor, it has to be looked at as if the observer were not affected by it otherwise the observer's own preconceptions prevent objective analysis.
You and JP might be able to keep this bullshit up ad infinitum, but I can't be bothered, carry on without me.
Bookmarks