Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43

Thread: A bit of history you weren't aware of...

  1. #11
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,527
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ava Estelle View Post
    It seems to have been a selective copy and paste job too ...


    What Thomas Jefferson learned from the Muslim book of jihad
    By Ted Sampley
    U.S. Veteran Dispatch
    January 2007



    Democrat Keith Ellison is now officially the first Muslim United
    States congressman. True to his pledge, he placed his hand on the
    Quran, the Muslim book of jihad and pledged his allegiance to the
    United States during his ceremonial swearing-in.
    Capitol Hill staff said Ellison's swearing-in photo opportunity
    drew more media than they had ever seen in the history of the
    U.S. House. Ellison represents the 5th Congressional District of
    Minnesota.
    The Quran Ellison used was no ordinary book. It once belonged to
    Thomas Jefferson, third president of the United States and one of
    America's founding fathers. Ellison borrowed it from the Rare
    Book Section of the Library of Congress. It was one of the 6,500
    Jefferson books archived in the library.
    Ellison, who was born in Detroit and converted to Islam while in
    college, said he chose to use Jefferson's Quran because it showed
    that "a visionary like Jefferson" believed that wisdom could be
    gleaned from many sources.
    There is no doubt Ellison was right about Jefferson believing
    wisdom could be "gleaned" from the Muslim Quran. At the time
    Jefferson owned the book, he needed to know everything possible
    about Muslims because he was about to advocate war against the
    Islamic "Barbary" states of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and
    Tripoli.
    Ellison's use of Jefferson's Quran as a prop illuminates a
    subject once well-known in the history of the United States, but,
    which today, is mostly forgotten - the Muslim pirate slavers who
    over many centuries enslaved millions of Africans and tens of
    thousands of Christian Europeans and Americans in the Islamic
    "Barbary" states.
    Over the course of 10 centuries, Muslim pirates cruised the
    African and Mediterranean coastline, pillaging villages and
    seizing slaves.
    The taking of slaves in pre-dawn raids on unsuspecting coastal
    villages had a high casualty rate. It was typical of Muslim
    raiders to kill off as many of the "non-Muslim" older men and
    women as possible so the preferred "booty" of only young women
    and children could be collected.
    Young non-Muslim women were targeted because of their value as
    concubines in Islamic markets. Islamic law provides for the
    sexual interests of Muslim men by allowing them to take as many
    as four wives at one time and to have as many concubines as their
    fortunes allow. And since Muslim men tend to be ugly they needed a wide selection of willing women.
    Boys, as young as 9 or 10 years old, were often mutilated to
    create eunuchs who would bring higher prices in the slave markets
    of the Middle East. Muslim slave traders created "eunuch
    stations" along major African slave routes so the necessary
    surgery could be performed. It was estimated that only a small
    number of the boys subjected to the mutilation survived after the
    surgery. This is reminiscent of the butchery committed on infant baby girls where their genitals are mutilated to prevent any sexual pleasure.
    When American colonists rebelled against British rule in 1776,
    American merchant ships lost Royal Navy protection. With no
    American Navy for protection, American ships were attacked and
    their Christian crews enslaved by Muslim pirates operating under
    the control of the "Dey of Algiers"--an Islamist warlord ruling
    Algeria.
    Because American commerce in the Mediterranean was being
    destroyed by the pirates, the Continental Congress agreed in 1784
    to negotiate treaties with the four Barbary States. Congress
    appointed a special commission consisting of John Adams, Thomas
    Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, to oversee the negotiations.
    Lacking the ability to protect its merchant ships in the
    Mediterranean, the new America government tried to appease the
    Muslim slavers by agreeing to pay tribute and ransoms in order to
    retrieve seized American ships and buy the freedom of enslaved
    sailors.
    Adams argued in favor of paying tribute as the cheapest way to
    get American commerce in the Mediterranean moving again.
    Jefferson was opposed. He believed there would be no end to the
    demands for tribute and wanted matters settled "through the
    medium of war." He proposed a league of trading nations to force
    an end to Muslim piracy.
    In 1786, Jefferson, then the American ambassador to France, and
    Adams, then the American ambassador to Britain, met in London
    with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the "Dey of Algiers" ambassador
    to Britain.
    The Americans wanted to negotiate a peace treaty based on
    Congress' vote to appease.
    During the meeting Jefferson and Adams asked the Dey's ambassador
    why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with
    which they had no previous contacts.
    In a later meeting with the American Congress, the two future
    presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja
    had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their
    Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who
    should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that
    it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they
    could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as
    Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain
    in Battle was sure to go to Paradise."
    For the following 15 years, the American government paid the
    Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American
    ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom
    and tribute amounted to 20 percent of United States government
    annual revenues in 1800.
    Not long after Jefferson's inauguration as president in 1801, he
    dispatched a group of frigates to defend American interests in
    the Mediterranean, and informed Congress.
    Declaring that America was going to spend "millions for defense
    but not one cent for tribute," Jefferson pressed the issue by
    deploying American Marines and many of America's best warships to
    the Muslim Barbary Coast.
    The USS Constitution, USS Constellation, USS Philadelphia, USS
    Chesapeake, USS Argus, USS Syren and USS Intrepid all saw action.
    In 1805, American Marines marched across the dessert from Egypt
    into Tripolitania, forcing the surrender of Tripoli and the
    freeing of all American slaves.
    During the Jefferson administration, the Muslim Barbary States,
    crumbling as a result of intense American naval bombardment and
    on shore raids by Marines, finally officially agreed to abandon
    slavery and piracy.
    Jefferson's victory over the Muslims lives on today in the Marine
    Hymn, with the line, "From the halls of Montezuma to the shores
    of Tripoli, we will fight our country's battles on the land as on
    the sea."
    It wasn't until 1815 that the problem was fully settled by the
    total defeat of all the Muslim slave trading pirates.
    Jefferson had been right. The "medium of war" was the only way to
    put and end to the Muslim problem. Mr. Ellison was right about
    Jefferson. He was a "visionary" wise enough to read and learn
    about the enemy from their own Muslim book of jihad.. Enemies it seems now to be found in Congress, in the person of Ellison himself who seems not to have known of the actual history of the United States bringing these heinous barbarians to heel. Force is all that Muslims understand, which two Muslim nations have now been accorded.
    Sorry - didn't mean to imply it was my work product, and didn't realize I'd cut Ted Sampley's name off the c & p.

    It copyed with picture links, ads and triple-spacing between paragraphs, and I worked from bottom-to-top rather than the other way around.

    No intent to plagerize.

    So, any commentary on the content of the article, or just snarky stuff about my egregious oversight?
    yeah, it's hypocritical smear. the mentality of the guy who wrote it and anyone who thinks it means anything is tantamount to racism.

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #12
    MagicNakor's Avatar On the Peripheral
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    5,202
    Quote Originally Posted by MrMurf View Post
    First post here, just joined this morning. Great forum

    Not sure what the point of the article is really - far as I can see the logic goes something like this.

    1) Jefferson owned a Quran.
    2) Some Muslims were pirates.
    3) ...
    4) All Muslims are evil.

    I think I lost point 3) somewhere in the mix.


    Enjoy your stay.



    Edit: Point 3) And since Muslim men tend to be ugly...
    Last edited by MagicNakor; 02-08-2007 at 12:38 PM.
    things are quiet until hitler decides he'd like to invade russia
    so, he does
    the russians are like "OMG WTF D00DZ, STOP TKING"
    and the germans are still like "omg ph34r n00bz"
    the russians fall back, all the way to moscow
    and then they all begin h4xing, which brings on the russian winter
    the germans are like "wtf, h4x"
    -- WW2 for the l33t

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #13
    Quote Originally Posted by MagicNakor View Post
    Edit: Point 3) And since Muslim men tend to be ugly...
    Ah of course! The ole ugly-pirate=evil axiom. How could I forget? I knew I should've stayed awake in those logic classes at university.

    I thought this article might be about the Nanking Massacre which bubbled up on Digg recently : http://prion.bchs.uh.edu/~zzhang/1/Nanking_Massacre/

    Now there's a sobering bit of history many in the West don't have a clue about.

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #14
    Barbarossa's Avatar mostly harmless
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Over here!
    Posts
    15,180
    So we have Thomas Jefferson to thank for global warming?



    Source : http://www.venganza.org/

    Well that's just peachy, that is.

  5. The Drawing Room   -   #15
    It seems Ted Sampley has a bit of history attached to him, here's an example ...

    McCain Says Sampley Has a Nose for Publicity and Knack for Making Money From Invented Controversies
    "Ted Sampley, whose nose for publicity and knack for making money from invented controversies is colorfully detailed by Mrs. Keating, is the author of my own chapter in the POW conspiracy, in which I am exposed as a KGB-trained Manchurian Candidate. Mrs. Keating puzzles over the perverse pride Mr. Sampley takes in his work, which included torturing the family of an American POW in Iraq with fabricated details of his cruel death at the hands of an Iraqi mob. When the pilot was subsequently freed alive, Mr. Sampley dismissed his fraud as necessary to publicize the plight of POWs. Mr. Sampley excuses all his scams as necessary to advance a noble cause. Mrs. Keating reveals that his likely real motive is more mundane: money. She notes his earnings from his T-shirt concession located near the Vietnam Veterans Memorial were nearly $2 million over three years. He keeps his overhead costs down by not paying a dime to his employees." -John McCain [Washington Times, 12/10/94]

    Source

    No wonder you wouldn't want people to know who wrote it!

  6. The Drawing Room   -   #16
    vidcc's Avatar there is no god
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,606
    One can only guess at the reason J2 posted the article but Sampley's intentions are obvious.

    A fairly elected lawmaker and patriotic American dared practice freedom of religion and use a holy book other than the bible for the "photo op" after his swearing in. This offended the right wingers. (freedom of religion should be changed to freedom of Christianity).

    So Ellison needs to somehow be connected to "the enemy" by any means possible.

    To paint all Muslims as evil and find anything from history that can connect Muslims with anything bad. Of course history could paint almost every religious group as bad but why let that get in the way of singling out one group that you hate.

    As we all know history shows that ALL Muslims are hate filled killers that wish to destroy all non Muslims.....they must be because we can cherry pick from their holy book to prove it (unlike the bible that has no suspect passages whatsoever). History also shows that not one unsavory thing has occurred at the hands of Christians

    it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.

  7. The Drawing Room   -   #17
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Ava Estelle View Post
    The bits left out put a different slant on the article, especially this bit ..

    Enemies it seems now to be found in Congress, in the person of Ellison himself who seems not to have known of the actual history of the United States bringing these heinous barbarians to heel. Force is all that Muslims understand, which two Muslim nations have now been accorded.


    As someone already pointed out, the hypocrisy here is mind-blowing!

    Quite what your intentions were in posting it only you know.
    I will claim ignorance of the "bits left out" because they were (as you've so graciously pointed out) omitted.

    The historical facts as related are true, no matter Sampley's extrapolative "conclusions" vis a vis Islam.

    I posted it to get opinions about what Ellison's intent in using it may have been-

    Did Ellison choose it because he was browsing the archives and discovered that Jefferson had owned a Quran, and as it was available to be used for the purpose he sought, he chose to be sworn on it because he concluded Jefferson must have been a fan/admirer of Islam, or-

    Did he use it with a full understanding of Jefferson's reasons for owning it?

    The latter possibility, I think you'd have to agree, makes very little sense, unless he is uber-cynical, which fact he would not likely see as aiding his cause.

    That, alongside the fact he himself stated that "visionary" Jefferson's ownership was for purposes of gaining knowledge of a religion and an ideology he knew nothing about, yet fail to acknowledge Islam was at that time acting in brutal opposition to American interests, and the latter was Jefferson's reason for procuring it.

    But I'm sure you don't want to talk about that, do you?
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  8. The Drawing Room   -   #18
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,527
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ava Estelle View Post
    The bits left out put a different slant on the article, especially this bit ..

    Enemies it seems now to be found in Congress, in the person of Ellison himself who seems not to have known of the actual history of the United States bringing these heinous barbarians to heel. Force is all that Muslims understand, which two Muslim nations have now been accorded.


    As someone already pointed out, the hypocrisy here is mind-blowing!

    Quite what your intentions were in posting it only you know.
    I will claim ignorance of the "bits left out" because they were (as you've so graciously pointed out) omitted.

    The historical facts as related are true, no matter Sampley's extrapolative "conclusions" vis a vis Islam.

    I posted it to get opinions about what Ellison's intent in using it may have been-

    Did Ellison choose it because he was browsing the archives and discovered that Jefferson had owned a Quran, and as it was available to be used for the purpose he sought, he chose to be sworn on it because he concluded Jefferson must have been a fan/admirer of Islam, or-

    Did he use it with a full understanding of Jefferson's reasons for owning it?

    The latter possibility, I think you'd have to agree, makes very little sense, unless he is uber-cynical, which fact he would not likely see as aiding his cause.

    That, alongside the fact he himself stated that "visionary" Jefferson's ownership was for purposes of gaining knowledge of a religion and an ideology he knew nothing about, yet fail to acknowledge Islam was at that time acting in brutal opposition to American interests, and the latter was Jefferson's reason for procuring it.

    But I'm sure you don't want to talk about that, do you?
    does it really matter? this is 2007. the guy is as american as anyone else in congress

  9. The Drawing Room   -   #19
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,890
    Quote Originally Posted by GepperRankins View Post
    does it really matter? this is 2007. the guy is as american as anyone else in congress
    Does it matter?

    It's the type of thing you'd keel-haul a conservative for, The.

    By the way, what is it you think you know about being an American?
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  10. The Drawing Room   -   #20
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,527
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GepperRankins View Post
    does it really matter? this is 2007. the guy is as american as anyone else in congress
    Does it matter?

    It's the type of thing you'd keel-haul a conservative for, The.

    By the way, what is it you think you know about being an American?
    i would never keel haul* anyone over something that happened to their ancestors.

    whatever that means *

    yeah i compared this particular point to the american-african slave trade because that's how far your ludicrous argument seemed to go back to, so it was a worthy point to say "if you want to chastise muslims for it, your far off ancestors did the same". the history of islam sure is chequered. as far as muslim countries it's been dodgy for several hundred years.

    however out of between 1 and 6 million muslims in america about a dozen have allegedly been terrorists, yet your ted sampley tries to draw all muslims as enemies of america and you seem to condone it

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •