Not to smoke but leave other smokers alone
Yeah, but do you see how everyone is ganging up on the smokers? is almost like a freakin' witch hunt, i do agree that second hand smoke is bad, but here in the states, one of the first smoking bans to become famous was the california smoking ban, which banned it from pubs. my logic is this, if you are that terribly concerned about your health, why are you in a pub? you like the peanuts? most people drink in pubs, and yes i agree that's less invasive because unlike the smoke, that doesn't affect the non-drinking people in the pub. but i do think that a smoky pub is an incentive for the patrons not to stay there all day and drink their life away, which is a good incentive imo. other public places bans are different, i agree with those, except outdoor ones that's a little h4rsh considering the smoke mostly just goes up into the atmosphere.
Last edited by MediaSlayer; 04-09-2007 at 06:27 AM.
sending fiery missiles inmanker'sjapan's general direction.
There is nothing which is analogous with smoking.
So why do people keep trying to debate this issue by analogy.
I don't smoke !
in the spirit of healthy debate, i'm going to have to disagree with this:
smoking is something that many people do, to lighten up and relax
drinking is something that many people do, to lighten up and relax
so the similarity is in the motivation, although the means are different
sending fiery missiles inmanker'sjapan's general direction.
.."To be or not to be" that is actually the question...
i dont smoke...
why do people smoke ??? lol
Bookmarks