Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 50

Thread: What level is RTS ??

  1. #31
    clos's Avatar The Zinc Saucier BT Rep: +25BT Rep +25BT Rep +25BT Rep +25BT Rep +25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by jaqozo View Post
    Don't take the traders their illusion
    uh?

  2. BitTorrent   -   #32
    KFlint's Avatar ... BT Rep: +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,056
    edit
    Last edited by KFlint; 05-22-2007 at 06:56 PM.

  3. BitTorrent   -   #33
    Patriot foreve's Avatar William Wallace
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,161
    Quote Originally Posted by clos View Post
    the 'WIAW' thread is not always the best representation of how good a tracker is....TL is a great tracker, one of the best in my opinion and its only a level 2 or 3....just because their not hard to get doesn't mean that a site isn't good
    well,why everyone just looks on the rarity ranking and don't just notice the second ranking regarding (content+speed+pre times) which should be where most of us look ,TL is ranked as 9 in that ranking

    The rarity of the tracker doesn't mean that's the best but its' content,community,speeds,pre times and others should be what matters in the first place

    The Second ranking which is present doesn't take the rarity in consideration and that's the point of having double rankings in the thread

  4. BitTorrent   -   #34
    Pluto's Avatar Enforcer BT Rep: +4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    333
    SCN is shaping up to be a great tracker. RTS on the other hand sucks. Open signups are a poor idea, you get all sorts of losers that way. If you cant find an invite their then you dont deserve to be their. SCN reminds me ftn when it was trying to make it in the world of torrent site bonanza. And SCN has got freeleech w00t w00t

    RTS is worthless they have horrible speeds and a community of fucking noobs.

  5. BitTorrent   -   #35
    BANNED BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    558
    Quote Originally Posted by Pluto View Post
    SCN is shaping up to be a great tracker. RTS on the other hand sucks. Open signups are a poor idea, you get all sorts of losers that way. If you cant find an invite their then you dont deserve to be their. SCN reminds me ftn when it was trying to make it in the world of torrent site bonanza. And SCN has got freeleech w00t w00t

    RTS is worthless they have horrible speeds and a community of fucking noobs.
    I wish I could give you a reputation point

  6. BitTorrent   -   #36
    Poster BT Rep: +5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    46
    I signed up to RTS to see what the fuss was about, and it's pretty dead in there. I know it's still new and all, but it doesn't look very promising to me. Unfortunately, I don't have access to SCN to compare.

  7. BitTorrent   -   #37
    DaMan05's Avatar GO HABS GO! BT Rep: +17BT Rep +17BT Rep +17BT Rep +17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    HOME OF THE HABS!
    Posts
    435
    RTS opened sign ups?... i wouldnt no cuz i parked my account and have left it.
    Last edited by DaMan05; 05-23-2007 at 12:24 AM.

  8. BitTorrent   -   #38
    AkaiDoresu's Avatar MilfHunter BT Rep: +45BT Rep +45BT Rep +45BT Rep +45BT Rep +45BT Rep +45BT Rep +45BT Rep +45BT Rep +45
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    783
    R*S seems to be a way behind S*N.

    I think S*N will be lvl8 I the next few weeks and maybe lvl10 later on because the idea of the whole site is just amazing.

  9. BitTorrent   -   #39
    clos's Avatar The Zinc Saucier BT Rep: +25BT Rep +25BT Rep +25BT Rep +25BT Rep +25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by Patriot foreve View Post

    well,why everyone just looks on the rarity ranking and don't just notice the second ranking regarding (content+speed+pre times) which should be where most of us look ,TL is ranked as 9 in that ranking

    The rarity of the tracker doesn't mean that's the best but its' content,community,speeds,pre times and others should be what matters in the first place

    The Second ranking which is present doesn't take the rarity in consideration and that's the point of having double rankings in the thread
    I understand what your saying, but the only ranking anyone really cares about around here is the rarity ranking, regardless of whether or not there is a two part ranking system. You don't see TL get traded for anything, people just give it away for free - which I think ends up being good for the tracker, more people = more seeds = better community as a whole.

  10. BitTorrent   -   #40
    Member BT Rep: +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,529
    Patriot I think there should be only 1 Ranking. Overal quality ranking. Speed/content/pre times.

    It's just stupid seeing people trade 5 good trackers for a shitty tracker because of rarity. The whole rarity rating needs to go and all those good trackers not even on the list should be added too. Then we really can have a list of good trackers.

    People use the rarity rating just to obtain well buffered accounts on good trackers and leech them dry.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •