Swebits Vs. SweDVDR

[nadeem111as]

thanks for the info

[Dr_Green_Thumb]

swebits has more torrents = bigger selection

[WHRST]

I hear swebits is just as good as swedvdr just not as rare. Not into dl'ing dvdrs these days though.

[saulin]

Swebits is one of my favorite trackers

I only try to download DVD-R movies. I would love to get HD rips instead but I don't have a media center PC and my Xbox can't handle HD rips. HD rips are usually 4-8 gigs and wow they look much better than DVD.

[PabloEscobar]

Yup, personally I can tell you that SweBits is better if you need Dvdr's. But again I prefer sticking to the good and small xvids

[WHRST]

Yup, personally I can tell you that SweBits is better if you need Dvdr's. But again I prefer sticking to the good and small xvids

agreed yes, xvid is better for me less time to dl and seed back and standalone players support it. Though full dvds r still better quality, but not noticable enough for me.

[deuce6000]

Standalone players support xvid?Thats new to me,What do you use to burn it onto a dvd?

[WHRST]

Standalone players support xvid?Thats new to me,What do you use to burn it onto a dvd?

ya I have a Philips and have about three of em which r all easily region unlocked, I use nero to burn as data disc. They also play all dvds i burn perfectly. Though only use scene rips because they won't work with something called gmc, an encoder i am told. I have had a few scene rips give me errors like gmc not supported when I try to play them but 99% of the time all scene rips work.

[mortalman]

i use swebits more than swedvdr because it is easier to seed there


ps i still use REVTT over top trackers same content same speed go figure(easier to seed back)

[menkää_vittuun]

It's good to have both of them