Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Mp3s -> Small, Yet High Quality

  1. #11
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Belle Vernon, PA, USA
    Posts
    638
    Originally posted by Amarjit@20 June 2003 - 22:45
    MPEG Layer-3, 24 kHz, Stereo
    Yeah, all you did was lower the sampling frequency. There is a loss of sound quality involved, but perhaps the song you chose didn't make it very obvious. Of course, what's the bitrate?

    Read this for more info: MP3 Compression Standards; Sampling Frequency and Bit Depth.

  2. File Sharing   -   #12
    Rocktron's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Den Haag, The Netherlands
    Age
    59
    Posts
    1,232
    QUALITY is what it's all about people!

    Size does not matter in this case hehehe...

  3. File Sharing   -   #13
    chalkmongoose
    Guest
    Actually, I have downloaded a 40 meg WAV file. It does sometimes improve sound quality, especially with classical music, which can render awfully in MP3 format.

  4. File Sharing   -   #14
    The key is going mono. I've messed around with recording at really low bitrates and found that, if you do it in mono as opposed to stereo you can compress an hour of music into a 3mb file. You'll get a little extra noise but if you rase that so that it is about 10mb, you can't tell the difference between that and a regular CD. In my opinion mp3s could be smaller for all but the most serious audiophile.

  5. File Sharing   -   #15
    Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,582
    I don't know how serious you'd have to be to prefer stereo to mono?
    it's a bit flat and lifeless after generations of listening to 2 channel, 4 channel or even better.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •