SCT Down Again

[beat]

P2P was meant to be free, there is no sense in paying for filesharing. Even though they're not forcing anyone to pay for it, just having that option and publicizing it is bad enough. Also Pay2Leech is just another reason for the scene to hate P2P even more and for this one I have to agree with them. You steal another person's work and go around selling it.

[berry89]

Doesnt matter how much a site charges for invites. Pay2leech is wrong in terms of the p2p community and thats a fact. Simple as.

no mate, you use bad term is not wrong, it just could be not good. there much position to view it. what you prefer? pay and help the server or pay help server and get invite at the same time ,to maybe used to invite your friend,family,ect?

[dragos]

no maybe it should be like ftn , without money. So it could have 10 users and a 10 $ server that loads in 5 hours. So it won't offende this kids with so much caracter

[beat]

If you do have an FTN account you can clearly see that every month they hit 100% on the donation status and that's without begging or even offering something to donors (besides the voice and the donor icon on the nick). And FTN is 3 times smaller than SCT which means less potential donors. As far as the server being slow I don't mind having to wait for an extra 5 seconds, because those seconds give me the security you will never have on SCT.

[JA]

If you do have an FTN account you can clearly see that every month they hit 100% on the donation status and that's without begging or even offering something to donors (besides the voice and the donor icon on the nick). And FTN is 3 times smaller than SCT which means less potential donors. As far as the server being slow I don't mind having to wait for an extra 5 seconds, because those seconds give me the security you will never have on SCT.

Word.

[berry89]

please dont compare ftn with sct. ftn mostly there with leech problem. also the staff begging users to leech ,why dont leech?blablabla. also ftn users used sct to grab the stuff and seed it there. so sct is always first site/place and ftn second . and this willnever change. at least if sct still exist.

[JA]

please dont compare ftn with sct. ftn mostly there with leech problem. also the staff begging users to leech ,why dont leech?blablabla. also ftn users used sct to grab the stuff and seed it there. so sct is always first site/place and ftn second . and this willnever change. at least if sct still exist.

Your join date says it all mate.(May 2007)

[berry89]

let me spam too .

[beat]

please dont compare ftn with sct. ftn mostly there with leech problem. also the staff begging users to leech ,why dont leech?blablabla. also ftn users used sct to grab the stuff and seed it there. so sct is always first site/place and ftn second . and this willnever change. at least if sct still exist.

Your join date says it all mate.(May 2007)

Don't judge people by their join date.

It wasn't me who started comparing FTN to SCT. For the reasons I already stated and for countless others I won't bother discussing (because they have already been discussed to the bone here) comparing FTN to SCT is pointless. I just had to stood up for what I believe

[berry89]

i agree with you beat and i respect your opinion about pay4leech/pay4invite.