Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 102

Thread: Why is everyone against traders?

  1. #91
    Poster BT Rep: +15BT Rep +15BT Rep +15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    677
    The best BT user is some guy with no life, who seeds just to 1:1 and leaves, fills requests all day, helps you like a slave, will buff your account for you, will suck cock and give money.
    Guess this country:
    -Child porn is legal to possess.
    -Home of lolicon & enjo kosai
    -Subways are littered with "Warning: Perverts lurking" signs
    -Has women only subway cars because of the high sexual assault rates
    -Cartoon child porn is a $6 billion industry
    -90% of child porn on the internet is from this country
    -Ranked equally with Cambodia and Ethiopia for prostitution

  2. BitTorrent   -   #92
    Poster BT Rep: +21BT Rep +21BT Rep +21BT Rep +21BT Rep +21
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    496
    Just wanted to say 10 pages. Whoo.

    Also a lot of traders don't just "collect accounts." Say I have a SCT invite and I want a TT invite.

    Now I can:
    1. Give my SCT invite away and make someone very happy
    2. Then post asking for a TT invite when dozens of other users who have been here longer, contributed and posted more than me, want it and have asked for it
    3. And hope.

    Or I can:
    1. Make a thread trading SCT for TT
    2. Get an offer within a few minutes. Trade. And now I would have TT.

    Which way is easier and safer? (safer meaning I'm actually going to get an invite, and not just hoping someone will invite me)

  3. BitTorrent   -   #93
    Ænima's Avatar 2 in 1 BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by squirr3l View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by squirr3l View Post
    When you sign up for a tracker, you tick the checkbox saying “I agree with rules and agreement” and one of the rule is not to trade invite/account (for most of the tracker)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ænima View Post
    Trading should be held as moral and honest when without scammers because of the implication of trading invites value-for-value.
    To be against traders is to be against the free market.
    1o I don't see ANY morality in breaking rules of something you are feeding upon.
    Morality: the way we should live as a society. To be moral is to trade value-for-value, regardless of whether the establishment allows it. This applies to all products produced by one's mind (whether it is a book, a music album, or a tracker invite.)
    Quote Originally Posted by squirr3l View Post
    2o And honesty? Tracker give you invite to invite people, not to trade 'em.
    You once again misunderstand me. Why else would if input the phrase "when without scammers" if not to highlight the unbreakably honest transaction between two traders, who consent to trade equally valued invitations. Ratio proofs and Speedtests in giveaways can be forged, after all.
    Again, I am not regarding whether the establishment allows such trade agreements.
    Quote Originally Posted by squirr3l View Post
    When you say "free market" You realize that you are comparing internet to real life? And...you realize it's not really free because tracker staff are chasing after you?
    squirr3l, as far as I am concerned, the internet is apart of reality. It follows the same economic logic. Mind you, I will explain what I mean:
    Freedom is prevented by the establishment, or the tracker staff in this case, but if this trade agreement is done freely without sounding off any alarms, then it is perfectly reasonable to compare it to a free market, in which you produce something and then trade it for another product of equal value.

    My analogy is correct. This really isn't too hard to understand. Maybe you should reintroduce yourself to the definition of a free market (laissez-faire capitalism)?
    Last edited by Ænima; 12-07-2007 at 10:19 PM. Reason: addition

  4. BitTorrent   -   #94
    SgtMajor's Avatar Shut up u Lovely Boi BT Rep: +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,972
    You pays your money and you makes your choice, you have read in this thread what half will think of you, and that the other half couldn't give a shit.

    When and if you are looking for a freebie into the more elite sites at some time in the future, then remember your choices that you made earlier on your path will come back to play a major part in who gives you that invite, you either walk in the front door and feel proud that you go there on merit, or you sneak in the back door and hope they never catch you and disable your account. The smaller the base, the easier to trace.

    It cannot be stressed enough, respect.
    Yes Sir, I'm Right On It!!

  5. BitTorrent   -   #95
    .....
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    154
    Quote Originally Posted by Ænima View Post
    Morality: the way we should live as a society. To be moral is to trade value-for-value, regardless of whether the establishment allows it. This applies to all products produced by one's mind (whether it is a book, a music album, or a tracker invite.)
    What are you talking about? Your definition of morality makes no sense. According to what you've said selling arms to terrorists would be moral as I would be trading value for value without regard to whether it was allowed or not. The morality of a transaction cant be determined in a vaccuum only by reference to its form, it must be done by looking at its substance and its context. I'm not saying trading invites is immoral, just that your argument doesn't add up.

  6. BitTorrent   -   #96
    Ænima's Avatar 2 in 1 BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ænima View Post
    Morality: the way we should live as a society. To be moral is to trade value-for-value, regardless of whether the establishment allows it. This applies to all products produced by one's mind (whether it is a book, a music album, or a tracker invite.)
    What are you talking about? Your definition of morality makes no sense. According to what you've said selling arms to terrorists would be moral as I would be trading value for value without regard to whether it was allowed or not. The morality of a transaction cant be determined in a vaccuum only by reference to its form, it must be done by looking at its substance and its context. I'm not saying trading invites is immoral, just that your argument doesn't add up.
    My argument isn't adding up because you are looking at it too closely. I meant to imply that the other factors involved in the transaction are moral. Giving guns to terrorists isn't exactly the right way to live as a society, is it?
    Let's keep on topic. Why is trading invites amoral?

    Quote Originally Posted by SgtMajor View Post
    You pays your money and you makes your choice, you have read in this thread what half will think of you, and that the other half couldn't give a shit.
    I suppose you're right.
    Quote Originally Posted by SgtMajor View Post
    When and if you are looking for a freebie into the more elite sites at some time in the future, then remember your choices that you made earlier on your path will come back to play a major part in who gives you that invite, you either walk in the front door and feel proud that you go there on merit, or you sneak in the back door and hope they never catch you and disable your account. The smaller the base, the easier to trace.
    I don't care to attain invites from people who hold grudges
    Last edited by Ænima; 12-07-2007 at 11:04 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  7. BitTorrent   -   #97
    .....
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    154
    I wont redress the point for the sake of staying on topic

    Quote Originally Posted by Ænima View Post
    Why is trading invites amoral?
    I dont think it is. Given that everyone here doesnt think twice about flaunting the law to download the latest movie, its a bit rich when someone turns around and claims someone is immoral for breaking a trackers rules. It's not something I do myself but I can understand why people trade to get where they need to be. I still havent figured out why people trade for fun though, that just seems pretty sad to me.

    At the end of the day though, if you choose to trade you cant really complain when someone chooses not to give you free invites for fear that you will just trade on the account in a months time. Once you've made your bed you have to sleep in it.

    I also have to say that in my experience most of the "traders" here seem to be kids who never leave the invites section and make no other contribution in their posts other than "Level 8 for Level6!!! Youre crazy. You must offer more!!!!!!!!!" Im not saying they are all like that but its definitely a pattern, therefore its not really surprising when others dont warm to them.
    Last edited by Zeus; 12-07-2007 at 10:58 PM.

  8. BitTorrent   -   #98
    Ænima's Avatar 2 in 1 BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ænima View Post
    Why is trading invites amoral?
    I dont think it is. Given that everyone here doesnt think twice about flaunting the law to download the latest movie, its a bit rich when someone turns around and claims someone is immoral for breaking a trackers rules.
    Trade is such a loose term. Even during giveaways (among anonymous parties) there is a social element of trade.
    Every one respects those who give away invites. Every one also ascribes them a multitude of "BT Rep." Is that not trading your invites for social appraisal and other potential compensations? Is that not trading value-for-value?

    Following this logic, giveaways should be decried as much as trading invite-for-invite, potentially even more for hiding its true color underneath the pretense of "altruism."
    Last edited by Ænima; 12-07-2007 at 11:17 PM. Reason: revision

  9. BitTorrent   -   #99
    BANNED BT Rep: +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65BT Rep +65
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Ænima View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeus View Post
    I dont think it is. Given that everyone here doesnt think twice about flaunting the law to download the latest movie, its a bit rich when someone turns around and claims someone is immoral for breaking a trackers rules.
    Trade is such a loose term. Even during giveaways (among anonymous parties) there is a social element of trade.
    Every one respects those who give away invites. Every one also ascribes them a multitude of "BT Rep." Is that not trading your invites for social appraisal and other potential compensations? Is that not trading value-for-value?

    Following this logic, giveaways should be decried as much as trading invite-for-invite, potentially even more for hiding its true color underneath the pretense of "altruism."
    why u just think of giveaways like that why u cant think the person who do those giveaway only he spent alot of time to get some trackers and he wanna make it easly for others why its call help each other thats the point of giveaways

  10. BitTorrent   -   #100
    .....
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    154
    Why do you ask me to get back on topic and then start talking about value-for-value again. A trade by its very nature involves the exhange of value for value. i dont really get what your point is? I've already said I dont think its immoral and Ive explained why the exchange of value-for-value has little to do with morality. I dont however think that the increasing commoditisation of torrent trackers is a good thing for the bt scene in general.

Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •