Rate My Pc...

[egyptianmafia]

P4 3.2 GHz (Hyper Threading) 800 MHz FSB
1 gig DDR 400
Win. XP PRO
Maxtor 180 GIG HDD (8 mb cache)
ASUS P4C800-DLX
Samsung 16x DVD-ROM Drive,
Mitsumi 52x24x52 CD-RW Drive,
Sony DRU-500AX DVD+/-RW Drive
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro 128MB DDR (Video Card)
Sony SDMS71 17" Flat Panel
Sound Blaster 5.1...Upgrading to Audigy 2 Plat

[3rd gen noob]

Originally posted by egyptianmafia@25 July 2003 - 19:25
P4 3.2 GHz (Hyper Threading) 800 MHz FBS
1 gig DDR 400
Win. XP PRO
Maxtor 180 GIG HDD (8 mb cache)
ASUS P4C800-DLX
Samsung 16x DVD-ROM Drive, Mitsumi 52x24x52 CD-RW Drive, Sony DRU-500AX DVD+/-RW Drive ATI Radeon 9700 Pro 128MB DDR (Video Card)
Sony SDMS71 17" Flat Panel

you should get a big crt monitor and stop showing off

8 out of 10

also, learn to spell 'fsb'

[Lamsey]

Performance: 9/10

Cost efficiency: 3/10

[egyptianmafia]

8/10

man...i have 800FSB....

180 GIG HD 8mb

DVD writer
Cd Burner
DVD Rom

ATI 9700 Pro

1GIG Ram

and 8/10 only...

and 17'LCD is good...if i want more i would be looking at $1000+

[3rd gen noob]

Originally posted by egyptianmafia@25 July 2003 - 19:33
8/10

man...i have 800FSB....

180 GIG HD 8mb

DVD writer
Cd Burner
DVD Rom

ATI 9700 Pro

1GIG Ram

and 8/10 only...

and 17'LCD is good...if i want more i would be looking at $1000+

well, if you want 10/10 you'll have to do more than that anyway

there are oc'd p4's running at a gig more clock than you...with over 1 gig fsb...

you only have 180 gig hdd space. there are lots of people with more

you only have a 9700 pro (which is a little slow in comparison to 9800 pro

you only have 1 gig of ram. you could have 1.5 gig easily

as for monitor, crt are still the best option for outright performance

[harrycary]

Wouldn't it have been cheaper to just stuff a sock down your pants?

(fuck'n asshat show-off)

[bigdawgfoxx]

Ok hes trying to show off....but you have to admit its an awsome rig...nice ..id give it 9...best processor from the FACTORY and not overclocked lol 1 gig of ram...good..but more is always better lol im digging the monitor and the graphics are pretty nice and lots of HD...i give it about a 9

[Neo 721]

You want to build an Athlon system its much more cost affective and it can give you just as good performance.

[3rd gen noob]

Originally posted by Neo 721@26 July 2003 - 18:41
can give you just as good performance.

i'm a big athlon fan and even i would dispute that claim...

athlons are very efficient though

[bigdawgfoxx]

I agree with 3rd gen...sept im not that big of an AMD fan..i mean yeah it might be good and all..but im into brand names..thats just me though...i dont ever see myself using an AMD...and it doesnt give as good of performance....check some benchmarksBenchmark