foobar vs winamp

**Acid_death69** · 02-10-2008, 10:36 PM

Originally Posted by svr

Originally Posted by nkhlsrf

thts a very easy question..no doubt foobar..if winamp takes 5 seconds it doesnt even take one second to load..lolz..

Yes, foobar is awesome. I have been using it a while now and it is miles better than winamp. Reasons in posts above. I think I still have winamp installed but I will not have it in a few minutes

lol, where can i get foobar from? is the latest version the best at the mo? Using itunes at the mo and that takes like 10-15 seconds to load up and it depends on the amount of song that you have.

**Magnum** · 02-11-2008, 12:02 AM

Winamp is my vote...

**marquinhooo** · 02-11-2008, 01:42 AM

I vote winamp!! Is the best!! =)

**Skiz** · 02-11-2008, 09:27 AM

Originally Posted by Acid_death69

lol, where can i get foobar from? is the latest version the best at the mo? Using itunes at the mo and that takes like 10-15 seconds to load up and it depends on the amount of song that you have.

LINK

**Acid_death69** · 02-11-2008, 02:39 PM

Originally Posted by Skizo

Originally Posted by Acid_death69

lol, where can i get foobar from? is the latest version the best at the mo? Using itunes at the mo and that takes like 10-15 seconds to load up and it depends on the amount of song that you have.

LINK

thanks skizo

**MagusDraco** · 02-12-2008, 03:20 AM

Winamp's too entrenched in my computer habits for me to switch.

The same goes for media player classic (old wmp 6 beforehand).

That being said, Foobar's foo_dop plugin so I don't have to use iTunes with my iPod is kinda nice.

**zzzMonster** · 02-13-2008, 05:47 AM

Originally Posted by svr

I didnt hear any difference in sound quality with foobar and xmplay. Am I deaf?

There are differences, if you listen closely,some music will have cymbals sounds that will be missed with winamp and foobar. But the source must be lossless or from a cd. If it is in mp3, these details will probably be removed already