Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47

Thread: The War on FTN goes public

  1. #1
    Poster BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    52
    Hmmm, it looks like the attack on FTN was picked up by DailyTech, a mainstream tech site with a fairly large readership. So much for FTN's web address being vaguely secret
    EDIT: Some people think that linking to the article is inappropriate, so I've removed it. If you really want to read the piece, it's not that hard to find.
    Last edited by mavenfool; 01-10-2008 at 12:51 AM.

  2. BitTorrent   -   #2
    BANNED BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    246
    Was it ever secret?

  3. BitTorrent   -   #3
    Poster BT Rep: +5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by mavenfool View Post
    Hmmm, it looks like the attack on FTN was picked up by DailyTech, a mainstream tech site with a fairly large readership. So much for FTN's web address being vaguely secret
    Im glad you're helping
    DO NOT PM me 4 invites thanks

  4. BitTorrent   -   #4
    krunktastic's Avatar Krunk User+ BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    386
    Jeez, this is just unnecessary.
    It's not right to do this to people; we should be encouraging sharing, and isolation.
    FTN continues to do a great job at handling situations, this will not be an exception.

  5. BitTorrent   -   #5
    Poster BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by That1Guy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mavenfool View Post
    Hmmm, it looks like the attack on FTN was picked up by DailyTech, a mainstream tech site with a fairly large readership. So much for FTN's web address being vaguely secret
    Im glad you're helping
    It's not as if FTN's address was that hard to find in the first place. Hence the use of the word *vaguely*. Posting the link to this story is hardly going to be the end of the site.

    I just wanted to get people's thoughts about this being picked up by a mainstream tech site. It seems odd to me. I didn't even think that the stupid nfo was a big deal, but it's apparently become quite the story.

  6. BitTorrent   -   #6
    deathking81's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    523
    its not that the url is vaguely secret, its that you posted brandon's full name.
    lock post for his security man.



  7. BitTorrent   -   #7
    RoSsoNeRI's Avatar LoUiS VuiTtoN DoN BT Rep: +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100BT Rep +100
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,101
    ^^ Congrats dude - ur video was hilarious

  8. BitTorrent   -   #8
    lostdemon's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    733
    oooh cheesy puffs I like those
    I liked your video too

  9. BitTorrent   -   #9
    Actually, you can find the nfo even searching for it on google... and of course, the nfo is ALOT more explicit than this article.

    Tells alot of details. If the authority gets around it, they know exactly who and where he is.

    User of the .torrent files

  10. BitTorrent   -   #10
    deathking81's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60BT Rep +60
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by RoSsoNeRI View Post
    ^^ Congrats dude - ur video was hilarious
    LOL thx, didnt get the invite yet but will probably soon.



Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •