-
Poster
Um shn, I think your mistaken. Winamp 3.x series is the resource hog, not 2.x...
-
-
07-30-2003, 06:54 PM
Software & Hardware -
#12
=]
lol i use winamp 3 o well... i got 512mb ram to kill
-
-
07-30-2003, 07:00 PM
Software & Hardware -
#13
Poster
Definitely WMP 9. The best features, easiest to use and greatest looks. I used to use Winamp, it's looked like a VB program.
-
-
07-30-2003, 07:37 PM
Software & Hardware -
#14
Poster
I feel the same way Amarjit, I lloooovee Windows Media Player 9. Winamp looks so cheezy, and I don't like the way it organizes. (probably because I'm more familiar with WMP 9 though).
But I think they'd both be awesome though if I took the time to get more used to Winamp.
-
-
07-30-2003, 08:23 PM
Software & Hardware -
#15
Poster
BT Rep: +3
Originally posted by shn@30 July 2003 - 10:23
Not to offend anyone but they both suck.
Winamp is a resource hog and windows media player will never amount to anything because its a microsoft product embedded into windows.
then what should we use???? im talkin windows here, not linux............
-
-
07-30-2003, 08:31 PM
Software & Hardware -
#16
Poster
Winamp 3 is 100 times better than WINMP 9
-
-
07-30-2003, 08:40 PM
Software & Hardware -
#17
Ð3ƒμ|\|(7
Originally posted by Storm+30 July 2003 - 14:23--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Storm @ 30 July 2003 - 14:23)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-shn@30 July 2003 - 10:23
Not to offend anyone but they both suck.
Winamp is a resource hog and windows media player will never amount to anything because its a microsoft product embedded into windows.
then what should we use???? im talkin windows here, not linux............ [/b][/quote]
When it comes to audio tracks I rarely listen to them on my computer. I put most of em on my portable mp3 player. But if I do listen to them I use the core media player or one of the other handful of media players I have installed.
-
-
07-30-2003, 08:40 PM
Software & Hardware -
#18
I never used Winamp ,i use only WMP but i heard a lot of good comments about Winamp.
-
-
07-30-2003, 09:04 PM
Software & Hardware -
#19
Poster
Winamp 2 gets my vote over WMP.
As far as sound quality goes i think they're about the same. Yes, WMP9 has its SRS WOW effects, but there's any number of plugins for Winamp. Personally i don't use any of them; there's no substitute for a good sound card like an Audigy 2.
I also use Musicmatch Jukebox Plus for its brilliant file tagging feature. I paid for it though, about £13 only, but don't know if there's any way around that. Also it has good internet radio.
-
-
07-30-2003, 10:52 PM
Software & Hardware -
#20
Her angel of darkness
I used Real- once... I do not like softwares that keep useage statistics and act as havens for others to spy glimpses of what I am playing on it.
Wimamp3 was relatively simple to use. I loved the skins but ditched it for WMP9 because of the way it is integrated into the OS. Version 9 seemed to learn from past mistakes to include more of the options that attracted me to the Winamp series in the first place. I do not mind all the spyware-like components it is reputed for having so long as I have a good firewall in place. Codecs are easy enough to find for it as well. And I have a few plug-ins that work well with the player to enhance the overall experience.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks