SCC lies

[Vercors]

seconds for a 700mb file? I don't think so. Just to create and verify the torrent would take longer then a few seconds, even with bots. Creating torrents for larger files takes time, then theres the fact that they have to dl it first, which can be fast I'll admit, but I think that example was an exaggeration or just plain wrong.

Keep in mind that files are available on some sites before they actually get pre'd, so it doesn't literally take seconds to download/upload a 700MB file

[FACE_TO_FACE]

SCT is better than SCC

If you don't have SCT then you can say SCC is better

Why to compare with sct?

[fOrUmAs]

so im perusing the music section in SCC and I notice a lot of 1 digit pre times, IN SECONDS!!! How do they expect us to believe they get music to the site uploaded in 9 seconds? I know music files aren't large or anything, but come on.

please tell us more (your) lies

[Feeling]

9 secs on MP3 is very possible especially if its scc or sct. *shrug*

[Dark Archon]

SCC + S*T + TL = Probably the fastest Pre-times you will get.

[Feeling]

SCC + S*T + TL = Probably the fastest Pre-times you will get.

Ah you ruined it by saying TL...

[yayyyyyy]

SCC + S*T + TL = Probably the fastest Pre-times you will get.

TL pretimes? aren't the uploaders on there taking releases from the real 0day trackers?

[gan.nez]

SCC + S*T + TL = Probably the fastest Pre-times you will get.

TL pretimes? aren't the uploaders on there taking releases from the real 0day trackers?

don't know but the pre times from TL are not as good as the pre's of SCC

[mera]

I think SCC's pretimes are fast, so those times are probably pretty accurate but I have to say that your post title is a little harsh

[whiteyes]

where's the N*X review?
it said every torrent pre-time on N*X is less than 3 mins in past few years even on DVD-R and HD.
why is it removed?