Poster
BT Rep: +35
So today I was thinking about manufacturing candy that closely resemble M&M's, but aren't. They would be circular chocolates with a thin candy shell, and they'd be called N&Ns.
My question is, would I have my ass handed to me in court for my product's name?
sex a wolf in a bag
BT Rep: +70
I'm no lawyer cunt but..... As long as the logos were not similar and the packaging unique I think you might get away with it.
Apologies if you get sent to jail and bum-raped.
Now go away.
the o'lol factor
BT Rep: +10
just do it.
(plz don't sue me nike!)
Poster
BT Rep: +35
Well, have a unique logo already...Originally Posted by benchez
I'm no lawyer cunt but..... As long as the logos were not similar and the packaging unique I think you might get away with it.
Apologies if you get sent to jail and bum-raped.
Now my only concern is that the ingredients are the same. Maybe I could fudge them a bit as well as the nutrition facts. FDA prolly won't notice, right?
Retired
Dude a million other companies beat you too it. I have some knockoff M and M's at home right now. They just come in a bag from my local mom-and-pop grocery store. They are the same exact things, without the M's on them. Half the price too lol.
Poster
BT Rep: +35
Hmm, what about a rip-off of snickers? Could call it giggles.
Retired
Giggles?Hmm, what about a rip-off of snickers? Could call it giggles.
I'd buy them.
sex a wolf in a bag
BT Rep: +70
Good work there.How long did you spend on that.
Now go away.
Suprafreak6 is Back!
change each M&M to say N&N then i will congradulate you
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
No.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks