Ptn

[pharaoh]

when a site is mentioned in anyway what so ever its a security issue. url or not. adding *** isn't doing crap imo.

[pawned]

RTS once again lol

[briand5379]

Well we have anti trading trackers out there. I suppose it was only a matter of time before we had a pro trading tracker lol.

[marwell]

wow, 14 pages full of spam (not every post, but mine too)

why you guys posting here if they (mods, users, uploader...) of PTN wrote that they don't want you?

maybe is PTN a nice tracker (maybe is just a joke) , and many users here complain it with FTN, but this mansion was here when iTS was overviewed ... and its the same mansion, but different tracker, and still same words: If they want you, they will invite you (probably)

[stoi]

well this is something you wont see everyday, a tracker owner actually defending FST lol

but this is FST, not any tracker, so they can post and talk about anything they want.

if this tracker didnt want their URL known, then they should have asked the staff here to censor it, and they shouldnt have had userbars from uploaders to the sysops imo.

Trackers have got no law here, even though most wish they did, we can bitch and moan all we like, but nothing will ever change that fact.

You will find other trackers respect other trackers, places like this dont to such an extent (they do by filtering URLs if they are asked though) but you cant realy expect them to either, as they are not a tracker, and cover a lot more than just poxy Bittorrent (yes i said poxy, its not life and death here).

Surprisingly, this is why i quite like FST, they wont take any shit from trackers, a tracker says jump, they dont say how high, and i actually respect that.

It would be like FST coming to a tracker and saying, change this, im sure i know what the answer would be 99% of the time.

if you want a small tracker, dont hype it out of all proportion, if you do, expect there to be all this crap going on, it is pretty simple.

[rocky1234]

I agree to what stoi says. If u really want the tracker to be secret then why have the userbars for that. No userbar and no one will ever know that a tracker like this exist.

Is this all another way to create hype for the tracker.

Are we waiting for another Level 9 or something.

[Annoyed]

In my opinion, this is just a tracker that's out for the hype. For one thing, as Stoi pointed out, there's the userbars. Don't claim that you don't want your site to be well known...but then allow your members to have the sites userbars in their sig(even the sysop has one in his sig). And also, look at their name. Not very original. Similar to another "higher level" tracker, that's well hyped, and well sought after. Pretty lame.

[LoKaLiRi]

[jwsisliving1]

RTS once again lol

Your not even a member, so you must be so qualified to say that.

In my opinion, this is just a tracker that's out for the hype. For one thing, as Stoi pointed out, there's the userbars. Don't claim that you don't want your site to be well known...but then allow your members to have the sites userbars in their sig(even the sysop has one in his sig). And also, look at their name. Not very original. Similar to another "higher level" tracker, that's well hyped, and well sought after. Pretty lame.

I keep hearing this same old tired argument. Did they start any of these threads?

So what if some of them have userbars? So the only rational conclusion out there is they only want to hype their tracker in threads that leak their Url and breach their security. Very convoluted.

You don't even know the story, you just keep keep taking wild guesses.

[rocky1234]

Now why are u sad...