A Major Hole In Science

[Wolfmight]

Originally posted by lynx@6 August 2003 - 21:11
The apparent size of the complete images is 13 * 5 / 2 = 32.5 squares

But if you add up the apparent sizes of the individual parts you get

8 + 7 + (3 * 8 / 2) + (2 * 5 / 2) = 32 squares.

A variation of the size of the individual parts of about 1% along each axis is all that is needed to give this false picture, but on the scale shown this is undetectable.

get the amount per partion.. they will all the be the same.. it's so strange.

[lynx]

Originally posted by Wolfmight+7 August 2003 - 14:19--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Wolfmight @ 7 August 2003 - 14:19)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-lynx@6 August 2003 - 21:11
The apparent size of the complete images is 13 * 5 / 2 = 32.5 squares

But if you add up the apparent sizes of the individual parts you get

8 + 7 + (3 * 8 / 2) + (2 * 5 / 2) = 32 squares.

A variation of the size of the individual parts of about 1% along each axis is all that is needed to give this false picture, but on the scale shown this is undetectable.

get the amount per partion.. they will all the be the same.. it&#39;s so strange. [/b][/quote]

[crazy_billy_bats]

theres a hole inbetween my ass cheeks thru which shit passes.